‣ Follow if that sounds useful to you
‣ Do not follow if that sounds awful to you 😀
‣ For *Bluesky* posts on Techmeme, follow @chatter.techmeme.com
‣ For the main Techmeme headlines, follow @techmeme.com
Dan Mac / @daniel_mac8:
Sorry DeepSeek bros, these benchmarks aren't very impressive. Is DeepSeek still relevant? [image]
Dan Mac / @daniel_mac8:
Sorry DeepSeek bros, these benchmarks aren't very impressive. Is DeepSeek still relevant? [image]
Jukan / @jukan05:
So how big is the gap between China and the U.S. now? In some metrics, it even feels like China is ahead. [image]
Jukan / @jukan05:
So how big is the gap between China and the U.S. now? In some metrics, it even feels like China is ahead. [image]
@bidhan:
i just love how much the deepseek team genuinely cares about open source [image]
@bidhan:
i just love how much the deepseek team genuinely cares about open source [image]
Bryan Cheong / @bryancsk:
Calling it "Speciale" is, uh, a choice [image]
Bryan Cheong / @bryancsk:
Calling it "Speciale" is, uh, a choice [image]
@scaling01:
DeepSeek-V3.2 Speciale best or second best in all tested benchmarks but they still need to double their reasoning efficiency to be competitive [image]
@scaling01:
DeepSeek-V3.2 Speciale best or second best in all tested benchmarks but they still need to double their reasoning efficiency to be competitive [image]
Mehul Mohan / @mehulmpt:
there are 4 seasons in a year openai google anthropic china *you are here*
Mehul Mohan / @mehulmpt:
there are 4 seasons in a year openai google anthropic china *you are here*
@pledditor:
This is the digital version of ending up with sore, bruised knees from orally satisfying your employer in exchange for a promotion. [image]
@pledditor:
This is the digital version of ending up with sore, bruised knees from orally satisfying your employer in exchange for a promotion. [image]
Matt Stoller / @matthewstoller:
The billionaire circle the wagons around an obviously corrupt liar like David Sacks is fun to watch.
Matt Stoller / @matthewstoller:
The billionaire circle the wagons around an obviously corrupt liar like David Sacks is fun to watch.
@jason:
I wonder what would happen if we bought up all the shares if the Nytimes we could and joined the board 🤔😂😂😂
@jason:
I wonder what would happen if we bought up all the shares if the Nytimes we could and joined the board 🤔😂😂😂
@alx:
The New York Times attacking @DavidSacks means he's probably doing something right.
@alx:
The New York Times attacking @DavidSacks means he's probably doing something right.
Sam Gerstenzang / @gerstenzang:
We can all agree that, at best, David Sacks sucks. https://www.nytimes.com/...
Sam Gerstenzang / @gerstenzang:
We can all agree that, at best, David Sacks sucks. https://www.nytimes.com/...
Jason Goldman / @goldman:
When there's been a big NYT exposé on your self-dealing, the person you really want coming to your defense is the guy who was notoriously convicted of securities fraud
Jason Goldman / @goldman:
When there's been a big NYT exposé on your self-dealing, the person you really want coming to your defense is the guy who was notoriously convicted of securities fraud
David Folkenflik / @davidfolkenflik:
Time magazine owner calls NYT coverage of top Trump AI guy "almost strategic sabotage"
David Folkenflik / @davidfolkenflik:
Time magazine owner calls NYT coverage of top Trump AI guy "almost strategic sabotage"
@geiger_capital:
This NYT hit piece on David Sacks is so bad it's actually funny... "The AI Czar of the United States working to spread the technology of America's largest and most advanced chip company is a scandal." [image]
@geiger_capital:
This NYT hit piece on David Sacks is so bad it's actually funny... "The AI Czar of the United States working to spread the technology of America's largest and most advanced chip company is a scandal." [image]
Joshua Steinman / @joshuasteinman:
Genuine tossup as to which will have a greater net positive impact on humanity: David (1) working in the White House, or (2) hiring one of the world's top defamation firms to sue the New York Times.
Joshua Steinman / @joshuasteinman:
Genuine tossup as to which will have a greater net positive impact on humanity: David (1) working in the White House, or (2) hiring one of the world's top defamation firms to sue the New York Times.
@naval:
There are lies, damned lies, and NYT headlines. [image]
@naval:
There are lies, damned lies, and NYT headlines. [image]
Boris Wertz / @bwertz:
Completely senseless @nytimes piece on @DavidSacks - I wished we in 🇨🇦 had an equally competent AI & crypto czar! [image]
Boris Wertz / @bwertz:
Completely senseless @nytimes piece on @DavidSacks - I wished we in 🇨🇦 had an equally competent AI & crypto czar! [image]
@cernovich:
David Sacks had to sell off a lot of assets to avoid conflicts-of-interest. The country is fortunate to have him.
@cernovich:
David Sacks had to sell off a lot of assets to avoid conflicts-of-interest. The country is fortunate to have him.
Amira / @mira404:
Another NYT nothingburger made to look like a Pulitzer investigation. Why did they become this mediocre? 🤦♀️
Amira / @mira404:
Another NYT nothingburger made to look like a Pulitzer investigation. Why did they become this mediocre? 🤦♀️