meika
@whywe.bsky.social
21 followers
81 following
160 posts
writes on the big history we have
whyweshould.substack.com
or
self hosted… —more up to date at
whyweshould.loofs-samorzewski.com
Posts
Media
Videos
Starter Packs
meika
@whywe.bsky.social
· Oct 4
This libertarian manifesto, loved by Peter Thiel, urges a ‘cognitive elite’ to see selfishness as a virtue
The Sovereign Individual celebrates the instincts of the impossibly wealthy to accumulate, hoard and insulate themselves from the messier demands of mass democracy.
theconversation.com
meika
@whywe.bsky.social
· Oct 3
Alignment notes ① June 2025, New Norway
'Alignment' or 'aligning' came to my greater attention while in the latter half of my travels in Canada in 2025. These Alignment notes ⓧ posts are based on short notes from my red journal, an overwrit...
whyweshould.loofs-samorzewski.com
meika
@whywe.bsky.social
· Sep 13
the blur as a technique in the methodology space
I write about the blur as a state of mind, or perhaps it is better to say, a state of attention. Or intention : In philosophy, intentionality is the power of minds and mental states to be about, to re...
whyweshould.loofs-samorzewski.com
meika
@whywe.bsky.social
· Sep 11
meika
@whywe.bsky.social
· Sep 5
Alignment ⑦ counts towards causality
My writing on alignment, a sub-project of the taphonomy of worlding, now tilts to an embodied physics, which is a kind of metaphysics, but not about physics, but about how we world our bodies as anima...
whyweshould.loofs-samorzewski.com
meika
@whywe.bsky.social
· Aug 30
Alignment ⑥ Values are an effort not a coin
My writing on alignment, a sub-project of the taphonomy of worlding, is now at part 6, and while I was going to publish about causality next, I decided to get back to the first notes on alignment I wr...
whyweshould.loofs-samorzewski.com
meika
@whywe.bsky.social
· Jul 3
Reposted by meika
John Quiggin
@johnquiggin.bsky.social
· May 18
John Quiggin on Substack
My letter to the Economist, about the idea of a Chinese “quarantine” on Taiwan, got published (it’s below the linked letter here). As is normal, it was cut, so here’s the full version
The idea of a “quarantine” (scare quotes in original) has been put forward as a strategy the People's Republic of China might deploy against Taiwan https://www.economist.com/briefing/2025/05/01/any-chinese-curbs-on-taiwans-trade-would-carry-big-economic-costs. This new emphasis reflects widespread recognition, following the failure of Russian naval power in the Ukraine war, that neither a seaborne invasion nor a traditional blockade is likely to succeed in reincorporating Taiwan. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/implausibility-taiwan-blockade
But a quarantine lacks any definition in international law. It is, to use an Australianism, the blockade you have when you are not having a blockade.
The term, in this usage, was first used by President John F Kennedy in the Cuban missile crisis, as a tool of de-escalation. Kennedy wished to prevent the transfer of missiles to Cuba without provoking a nuclear war. Hence, he wanted to avoid declaring a blockade which is a well-defined act of war. The Soviets, also wishing to avoid nuclear war, did not break the quarantine, and did not challenge Kennedy's characterisation
This history makes it clear that the term "quarantine" is a legal fiction, dependent on the assent of both parties. There is no reason for Taiwan to take such a fiction seriously. Rather, any purported quarantine is, in reality, a blockade, and therefore an act of war. The only effect of using this terminology, rather than openly declaring a blockade, is to hand the initiative to Taiwan, which can choose whether and how to respond militarily.
The actual role of this fiction is to allow the perpetuation of a discussion in which a PRC takeover of Taiwan is a real and present danger rather than a possibility for the remote future. This fiction serves the interests of many parties: the PRC which must maintain the claim that it can reincorporate Taiwan if it chooses, the Taiwanese government which hopes for US aid, and the dominant faction in the US military and foreign policy establishment, for which the threat supposedly posed by China is a central part of the raison d'être. Recognition that a forcible reincorporation of Taiwan into the PRC is not actually possible would imply a fundamental rethinking which no-one who matters really wants.
https://www.economist.com/letters/2025/05/15/the-problems-with-deep-sea-mining
substack.com
Reposted by meika
meika
@whywe.bsky.social
· May 10
About time – how little we have
In the mid-1980s, on a windy slope with a view, overlooking the shallow waters flowing in Murrumbidgee of the Monaro, in southern New South Wales, a clean-cut hippy drummed deep into the weed-invested...
whyweshould.loofs-samorzewski.com
meika
@whywe.bsky.social
· May 9
Reposted by meika