We’re living through the greatest software quality crisis in computing history. A Calculator leaks 32GB of RAM. AI assistants delete production databases. Companies spend $364 billion to avoid fixing fundamental problems. This isn’t sustainable. Physics doesn’t negotiate. Energy is finite. Hardware has limits. The companies that survive won’t be those who can outspend the crisis. There’ll be those who remember how to engineer. Source: The Great Software Quality Collapse: How We Normalized Catastrophe

Unlock your productivity with tools designed for developers, by a developer. Source: Dev Tools – Your Ultimate Developer Toolkit | Free Online Tools

Imagine a responsive hero image that becomes more transparent as the viewport gets narrower, helping text readability on small screens or a card that scales up slightly as the viewport grows, adding a subtle polish. Until now, achieving these effects required complex calc() expressions or JavaScript, often leading to brittle solutions. But with the new CSS progress()function, you can express these relationships cleanly and intuitively. With the new CSS progress() function, you can express “how far” the viewport width has moved between a minimum and maximum size, and map that directly to opacity. Source: The new progress() function in CSS — Amit Merchant — A blog on PHP, JavaScript, and more

Source: The thing about contrast-color • Stuff & Nonsense

Today’s web is not always an amiable place. Sites greet you with a popover that demands assent to their cookie policy, and leave you with Taboola ads promising “One Weird Trick!” to cure your ailments. Social media sites are tuned for engagement, and few things are more engaging than a fight. Today it seems that people want to quarrel; I have seen flame wars among birders. These tensions are often at odds with a site’s goals. If we are providing support and advice to customers, we don’t want those customers to wrangle with each other. If we offer news about the latest research, we want readers to feel at

I’ve been more quiet here lately as I’m knee-deep working on my latest project. Agentic engineering has become so good that it now writes pretty much 100% of my code. And yet I see so many folks trying to solve issues and generating these elaborated charades instead of getting sh*t done. Source: Just Talk To It – the no-bs Way of Agentic Engineering | Peter Steinberger

Source: Where’s the AI design renaissance?

Framework monoculture is a psychology problem as much as a tech problem. When one approach becomes “how things are done,” we unconsciously defend it even when standards would give us a healthier, more interoperable ecosystem. Psychologists call this reflex System Justification. Naming it helps us steer toward a standards-first future without turning the discussion into a framework war. Source: Default Isn’t Design. Why familiar feels right but often… | by EisenbergEffect | Oct, 2025 | Medium

In most organisations, design documentation often includes annotations, but accessibility-specific ones are still rare. That’s a missed opportunity. Annotating designs for accessibility helps everyone involved understand what needs to be built, tested, and maintained. Using a common language that designers, developers, and quality assurance (QA) teams all understand is essential so that information doesn’t get lost in translation, especially during the hand-off between design and development. Source: Annotating designs using common language – TetraLogical

AI is not born neutral. The rules that govern how it behaves are set by its authors: corporations and governments embedding their own assumptions, priorities, and cultural defaults into code. Those rules travel with the system. If Australia adopts AI built to foreign specifications, we also import those embedded choices — about privacy, bias, autonomy, and control. We can avoid this dependency only by setting our own AI development guidelines, explicitly crafted to preserve sovereignty. That means writing the governance rules here, not just buying in systems and pretending we can retrofit “Australian values” later. The strategic choice is not whether to use AI, but whether to use someone else’s