A furry!
State Senate candidate for Minnesota, District 37 (Maple Grove and Surrounding Rural Shit).
90% of all anime/gatcha/visual novels are dominated by female characters. But gay men make something for themselves every once in a while and you guys won't stop shitting your pants over it.
90% of all anime/gatcha/visual novels are dominated by female characters. But gay men make something for themselves every once in a while and you guys won't stop shitting your pants over it.
1 : an instance of speech intended solely to broadcast an opinion without regard for response or comprehension.
2 : a person or entity that engages in performative debate without intent to listen.
See also: Steven Crowder, Charlie Kirk
1 : an instance of speech intended solely to broadcast an opinion without regard for response or comprehension.
2 : a person or entity that engages in performative debate without intent to listen.
See also: Steven Crowder, Charlie Kirk
#furry #furryart #furrysfw #furrycommission #chaiteakittenart
#furry #furryart #furrysfw #furrycommission #chaiteakittenart
Clarke: I want to take a break for a few days and watch some videos.
YouTube: *Shits on Clarke's YouTube algorithm until he posts another video*
Clarke: I want to take a break for a few days and watch some videos.
YouTube: *Shits on Clarke's YouTube algorithm until he posts another video*
Today, we cut the ribbon on their new campus that will add hundreds of jobs and keep that innovation in Maple Grove.
Today, we cut the ribbon on their new campus that will add hundreds of jobs and keep that innovation in Maple Grove.
The Supreme Court lacks the authority to change the text of the Constitution.
So either it affirms the text or (further, and more completely) nukes its authority as Constitutional arbiter.
There’s no third option. Art III (courts) can’t just usurp Art V (amendments).
The Supreme Court lacks the authority to change the text of the Constitution.
So either it affirms the text or (further, and more completely) nukes its authority as Constitutional arbiter.
There’s no third option. Art III (courts) can’t just usurp Art V (amendments).
The Supreme Court lacks the authority to change the text of the Constitution.
So either it affirms the text or (further, and more completely) nukes its authority as Constitutional arbiter.
There’s no third option. Art III (courts) can’t just usurp Art V (amendments).