@torchandpail.bsky.social
11 followers 5 following 18 posts
I’m trying to be anonymous 🙃
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
torchandpail.bsky.social
Oh man. I hate the way the lack of comms from the ARC has me consulting tea leaves trying to detect what’s to come!
torchandpail.bsky.social
@arc-tracker.bsky.social ignore the private message I sent you about this where I can’t post photos!
Just saw this, thought you’d find it interesting. I reckon LP or DP or both coming out tomorrow morning (see top message):
torchandpail.bsky.social
The ARC’s commitment to provide zero comms on anything (remember the last LP round release-dates chaos?) is probably its most dependable achievement.
torchandpail.bsky.social
Dumb question, but does that have any impact on schedule LP announcements for end Sept-early Oct? I’m not clear on how ARC recs made to senate connect to pending grants….
torchandpail.bsky.social
So it really is the end of the Future Fellowship… wonder if laureates will go too?
torchandpail.bsky.social
I saw your name and I’m so happy for you 😊
torchandpail.bsky.social
My pleasure! You do such a service for all us anxious academics
torchandpail.bsky.social
Could have said all this a month ago!
torchandpail.bsky.social
We should all refuse to assess ARC grant applications until they sort this out or at least communicate properly with us. It’s so embarrassing to try to explain to industry partners
torchandpail.bsky.social
Plus it’s embarrassing for us as researchers - we expended social capital convincing partners to join the project, and then we are implicated over ARC silence
torchandpail.bsky.social
@arc-tracker.bsky.social LP rejoinders are meant to be out today. Don’t suppose you’ve heard anything on that?
torchandpail.bsky.social
In what other industry would this be acceptable? Academics are one of the ARC’s key stakeholders (if not their primary stakeholder) but their treatment borders on contempt.