@titaniumtraveler.bsky.social
24, he/him, Rust enthusiast and fan of interesting semantics.
Github: https://github.com/titaniumtraveler/
Github: https://github.com/titaniumtraveler/
Pinned
Programming languages are for human-to-human communication. Not for human-to-machine communication.
Machines are fine with assembly. They are not the reason why we started using C.
Machines are fine with assembly. They are not the reason why we started using C.
I'm currently watching the second SDR-podcast live episode: www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubXj... and I will just leave this here ...
Discovering the fact that the numbers end up being just really _this_ simple is incredibly fun!
Discovering the fact that the numbers end up being just really _this_ simple is incredibly fun!
December 4, 2025 at 7:42 PM
I'm currently watching the second SDR-podcast live episode: www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubXj... and I will just leave this here ...
Discovering the fact that the numbers end up being just really _this_ simple is incredibly fun!
Discovering the fact that the numbers end up being just really _this_ simple is incredibly fun!
Reposted
Turing complete? Yes, definitely!
But defined in a specific language? No.
Instead the configuration should be defined via a protocol, which lets the client (the configurator) send requests to the server (the thing that is being configured) and lets the server send back events.
But defined in a specific language? No.
Instead the configuration should be defined via a protocol, which lets the client (the configurator) send requests to the server (the thing that is being configured) and lets the server send back events.
November 24, 2025 at 3:58 PM
Turing complete? Yes, definitely!
But defined in a specific language? No.
Instead the configuration should be defined via a protocol, which lets the client (the configurator) send requests to the server (the thing that is being configured) and lets the server send back events.
But defined in a specific language? No.
Instead the configuration should be defined via a protocol, which lets the client (the configurator) send requests to the server (the thing that is being configured) and lets the server send back events.
Programming languages are for human-to-human communication. Not for human-to-machine communication.
Machines are fine with assembly. They are not the reason why we started using C.
Machines are fine with assembly. They are not the reason why we started using C.
November 2, 2025 at 7:12 AM
Programming languages are for human-to-human communication. Not for human-to-machine communication.
Machines are fine with assembly. They are not the reason why we started using C.
Machines are fine with assembly. They are not the reason why we started using C.