Every post of her's reads like an unhinged AI... but an AI would at least be more comprehendable. I had to read that post multiple times to understand what she was trying to say.
I'd love for someone to ask her to define the word "fascism."
You're correct. This is a waste of time. I'd only bother providing a link if you showed evidence of being able to debate in good faith, especially given that your ask is so widely accessible and no doubt flooding your feed. I do still wonder what you stood to lose by answering. Oh well.
No, you responded multiple times without questioning its existence until your previous attempts to deflect failed. That's why I doubt providing it at this stage will do anything. If you had actually countered and claimed that such a list doesn't exist, I'd actually believe your intentions.
So, you're claiming ignorance now? I'd provide it if I actually thought it would matter. I do have to wonder what you stand to lose by admitting that the right is actively engaging in cancel culture.
I'm not making claims about fallout or whether fallout was justified. Just that the list exists and its being used to attempt to get people fired. I asked what the creation, spreading, and use of that list might be called. Perhaps now you can answer?
It's the same rhetoric they tell people in abusive relationships. They think they're entitled to kindness and respect while rarely offering it in return and only do so as a "moral high ground" ruse to hide all the harm they perpetuate.
This is a weird tangent. Sounds like you're jealous that other people are believed by parts of the internet and therefore what--I should believe you and the people you want to cherry pick?
If you want to excuse all your poor behavior by saying "so and so did worse" you're essentially admitting there isn't a line you'd draw morally because "someone else did it too/to a greater degree". "Whataboutisms" make for poor debate and even worse excuses.
No way to ensure credibility paired with increased incentive to lie/rage-bait to start. X is not a popular platform for "truth-telling" but instead finding people like yourself to seeth over manufactured scenarios. We all fall for those traps, no judgments there.
I'd love to see what you can find for statistical proof of this. A few people ranting on online forms can be found for just about any opinion under the sun. No, I want some period in history where women aborted male babies because little girls were more valued by society.
On what grounds? Abortion? Dems don't actually care that much about abortion. It rallies people to elections, and then when it comes time to act? Crickets. Newsom isn't gonna do much of anything but talk a big talk.
I mean, we've seen sterilization of both genders rise significantly as a result. I just hope there aren't people who are getting it purely because abortion isn't readily available and not because they never want to have kids. We don't know what the next election holds.
