Stephen West
@stephenwest.bsky.social
7.9K followers 880 following 3.9K posts
Historian of Civil War & Reconstruction. Bicyclist, baker, 3d favorite human of Banjo the dog. Views=mine, repost ≠endorsement
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
stephenwest.bsky.social
"Nations reel and stagger on their way; they make hideous mistakes; they commit frightful wrongs; they do great and beautiful things. And shall we not best guide humanity by telling the truth about all this, so far as the truth is ascertainable?"

W. E. B. Du Bois, "The Propaganda of History" 🗃️
Snip from Du Bois, "The propaganda of History" The closing chapter of black reconstruction in America
Reposted by Stephen West
leahlitman.bsky.social
More judges speak to the press (the NYT) about what a disaster the Supreme Court (specifically the shadow docket) has been - “incredibly demoralizing & troubling”; a “judicial crisis”; a “slap in the face to district courts.” www.nytimes.com/2025/10/11/u...
Excerpts Excerpts
Reposted by Stephen West
gbrockell.bsky.social
This is a problem with so much legacy media raising journalists with underdeveloped personal morality, trained to seek “iDEoloGIcaL diVErsitY” and not right and wrong. Because this argument is stupid and puny, and any columnist who can’t call it out immediately is not a serious person.

Watch: 1/2
stephenwest.bsky.social
Counterpoint:

You absolutely do not have to hand it to enslavers
Wilson: Now, one of the things I want to do is say: I’m really glad that slavery’s gone, and good riddance. And I want to say that the Southern slave owner, who read the books of Ephesians and Colossians and 1 Timothy and treated his slaves decently, remembering that he had a master in heaven who he studiously tried to obey — what Paul said slave owners were supposed to do — I would say he was not an orc, and he is part of the reason why slavery ended. In other words, I would say he’s a good guy.
Reposted by Stephen West
maxkennerly.bsky.social
Ross Douthat treats this guy like they're having some deep conversation about the relationship of Christianity and the government, but the dude is a garden-variety dull, shallow, hateful, worthless bigot with nothing interesting to say, just endless riffs on "God hates everything/everyone I do."
Douthat: So that’s the first purpose of your political project, for America to stop making God angry.

Wilson: Yes. And most people think that when they are confronted with that project, they think that we want to get our tentacles into everything and start controlling everything. I actually think we need limited government. The government should be significantly smaller than it is, and we need to curtail a lot of the busybodyness that we have. That’s why I would call myself a theocratic libertarian. There is a true libertarian element in this, and yet, the transcendent grounding for what we’re talking about means that we acknowledge the authority of God.

We have racked up quite a body count of awful crimes, and I believe the only way out is for us to repent and turn to Christ. This would be things like no more Pride parades, no more drag queen story hours, no more abortion on demand, no more legalized same-sex unions — all of that, done. That’s the repentance part.
stephenwest.bsky.social
Auditioning for the Smokey and the bandit remake
Photo of Jackie Gleason from Smokey and the Bandit, as Buford T Justice with a thin mustache l, sunglasses and brimmed hat
Reposted by Stephen West
histoftech.bsky.social
The Virginia Senate just told UVA it’s not getting state funding if it accepts the compact since UVA exists to serve Virginia, its residents, & their interests—not be a tool of the federal govt. Scoop from our student newspaper, who’ve been doing vital reporting www.cavalierdaily.com/article/2025...
stephenwest.bsky.social
It was quite the discovery!
Reposted by Stephen West
moiradonegan.bsky.social
Murray Rothbard famously said that his conservatism would “repeal the 20th century”, but these guys seem to be gunning for the 19th.
stephenwest.bsky.social
Counterpoint:

You absolutely do not have to hand it to enslavers
Wilson: Now, one of the things I want to do is say: I’m really glad that slavery’s gone, and good riddance. And I want to say that the Southern slave owner, who read the books of Ephesians and Colossians and 1 Timothy and treated his slaves decently, remembering that he had a master in heaven who he studiously tried to obey — what Paul said slave owners were supposed to do — I would say he was not an orc, and he is part of the reason why slavery ended. In other words, I would say he’s a good guy.
stephenwest.bsky.social
But you shouldn't be too surprised when they say stuff like this:

"You were better off being a Black person in Charleston, S.C., in 1850, when they had an operating slave market than being conceived as a Black baby in New York City or Baltimore today."
I don’t want to take any guidance at all from the secular society around us. And the reason I don’t is they killed 60 million babies. I don’t want to hear any more lectures from these people about slavery. You were better off being a Black person in Charleston, S.C., in 1850, when they had an operating slave market than being conceived as a Black baby in New York City or Baltimore today.
stephenwest.bsky.social
Yes, Doug Wilson, whom Ross Douthat thought worth an extended interview - see the 2d post
stephenwest.bsky.social
Spending your time talking to someone who wants to relitigate slavery is definitely a choice you can make
Opinion | He Believes America Should Be a Theocracy. He Says His Influence Is Growing.
www.nytimes.com
stephenwest.bsky.social
Counterpoint:

You absolutely do not have to hand it to enslavers
Wilson: Now, one of the things I want to do is say: I’m really glad that slavery’s gone, and good riddance. And I want to say that the Southern slave owner, who read the books of Ephesians and Colossians and 1 Timothy and treated his slaves decently, remembering that he had a master in heaven who he studiously tried to obey — what Paul said slave owners were supposed to do — I would say he was not an orc, and he is part of the reason why slavery ended. In other words, I would say he’s a good guy.
stephenwest.bsky.social
The framers certainly designed the Senate to be counter-majoritarian.

Which makes it all the more remarkable that they did *not* require super majorities in the Senate to pass most legislation.

That's a parliamentary add-on that is making an already undemocratic institution thoroughly sclerotic.
stephenwest.bsky.social
"The super majority requirement is something that makes the Senate the Senate.... The filibuster protects. It's been a voice for the minority. It gives the minority a say in what happens in this country. The Founders created the Senate uniquely that way for that specific reason."
atrupar.com
Thune: "If the Democrats had won the majority, they probably would've tried to nuke the filibuster. And then you'd have four new senators from Puerto Rico and DC, you'd have a packed Supreme Court, you'd have abortion on demand ... "
stephenwest.bsky.social
These are decades-long movements that culminated in real constitutional change.

But they lost a lot, and for a long time, before they won.

Yes, the people have changed the Constitution before. They can do it again. But there's no telling how long it will take - or that success awaits at the end.
Reposted by Stephen West
stephenwest.bsky.social
This is all correct.

But of course the hard part is how to make it work - how to translate activism into constitutional change, and how activists craft their strategies with an eye to courts, parties, and elected officials.
Skeptics will say that changing the Constitution is unrealistic. History proves otherwise. From abolitionists to suffragists, from labor organizers to civil-rights activists, generations of Americans have transformed the Constitution through vision, struggle and persistence — without waiting for the Supreme Court’s permission. They did not begin with majority support either in the court or across the nation, yet through conviction and politics they reshaped public opinion and, ultimately, the law itself.
Reposted by Stephen West
jcblibrary.bsky.social
TONIGHT at the JCB!

The John Carter Brown Library is pleased to announce that it will host Dr. Colleen J. Shogan, 11th Archivist of the United States.

This hybrid (in-person/Zoom) event will take place at 5 p.m. on Friday, October 10, 2025.

Part of 2026 and Beyond at the JCB.

All are welcome!
The image includes a photo of Colleen Shogan, the JCB logo, the JCB 2026 and Beyond logo, and the text that is presented in the main post.
stephenwest.bsky.social
"The combination of Mr. Trump’s authoritarian moves and the Supreme Court’s authorization of them has produced, for many, a deepening despair. But here is the essential fact: The Constitution’s meaning is not the Supreme Court’s alone to define. It belongs to 'we the people.' "
Opinion | The Constitution Doesn’t Belong to Trump or the Supreme Court
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by Stephen West
drleonj.bsky.social
Archival Name of the Day is Lord Wellington Gentleman (that’s his first, middle, and surname), carpenter, of Boston.

Source: Boston Police Court Docket, 1835. 🗃️
stephenwest.bsky.social
I had forgotten this bit about Noem, which indeed makes it awesomer
ericcolumbus.bsky.social
Trump (1) reveals he doesn't know what habeas corpus is and (2) punts to Noem, who famously revealed her own ignorance at a Senate hearing when she defined habeas corpus as "a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country."
www.npr.org/2025/05/20/n...
atrupar.com
Q: Have you given any more thought to possibly suspending habeas corpus?

TRUMP: Suspending who?

Q: Habeas corpus

TRUMP: I don't know. I'd rather leave that to Kristi.
Reposted by Stephen West