Stef Benstead
@stefbenstead.bsky.social
Christian interested in socio-economic justice.
Chronically ill with hEDS, PoTS, fibro/Small Fibre Neuropathy.
Independent (unpaid) researcher in chronic illness and social policy.
Books: Second Class Citizens; Just Worship.
Chronically ill with hEDS, PoTS, fibro/Small Fibre Neuropathy.
Independent (unpaid) researcher in chronic illness and social policy.
Books: Second Class Citizens; Just Worship.
Reposted by Stef Benstead
Lies, damned lies and the Telegraph. They posted CSJ figures using an outrageously false comparison of 2 cases. It claimed a benefits family were better off by £18k than a working household when the real figure was £16k worse off. The details benefitsinthefuture.com #benefits #budget
Benefits in the Future – Welfare reform commentary and analysis
Welfare reform commentary and analysis
benefitsinthefuture.com
December 1, 2025 at 8:27 PM
Lies, damned lies and the Telegraph. They posted CSJ figures using an outrageously false comparison of 2 cases. It claimed a benefits family were better off by £18k than a working household when the real figure was £16k worse off. The details benefitsinthefuture.com #benefits #budget
Rigby has 'the help of a runner' in order to play cricket, which suggests he can't run and may struggle to walk.
He is in pain, and has to take extra painkillers in order to play cricket. PIP is supposed to take into account the consequences of an activity, like pain.
www.lbc.co.uk/article/fath...
He is in pain, and has to take extra painkillers in order to play cricket. PIP is supposed to take into account the consequences of an activity, like pain.
www.lbc.co.uk/article/fath...
Howzat! One-legged father ordered to repay £36,000 in benefits after being filmed playing cricket | LBC
Shaun Rigby, from Telford in Shropshire, lost his leg below the knee at the age of two in a tractor accident and had received personal independence payments since 2016
www.lbc.co.uk
December 2, 2025 at 8:57 AM
Rigby has 'the help of a runner' in order to play cricket, which suggests he can't run and may struggle to walk.
He is in pain, and has to take extra painkillers in order to play cricket. PIP is supposed to take into account the consequences of an activity, like pain.
www.lbc.co.uk/article/fath...
He is in pain, and has to take extra painkillers in order to play cricket. PIP is supposed to take into account the consequences of an activity, like pain.
www.lbc.co.uk/article/fath...
'Can you change between pyjamas and day-time clothes at the start and end of the day, plus take a jumper off once in the day for a physio exam' is a really poor test for 'can you repeatedly raise your arms above your head without causing pain, weakness, or damage'.
December 1, 2025 at 12:18 PM
'Can you change between pyjamas and day-time clothes at the start and end of the day, plus take a jumper off once in the day for a physio exam' is a really poor test for 'can you repeatedly raise your arms above your head without causing pain, weakness, or damage'.
I'm not in such severe pain that to move my shoulders at all is completely intolerable and I can't force myself to do it. But there is pain, weakness, and instability. Over-activity or inappropriate activity would damage my shoulders, even if I can still put a jumper on and off.
December 1, 2025 at 12:17 PM
I'm not in such severe pain that to move my shoulders at all is completely intolerable and I can't force myself to do it. But there is pain, weakness, and instability. Over-activity or inappropriate activity would damage my shoulders, even if I can still put a jumper on and off.
I had a physio exam recently for my shoulders. I'm struggling with pain and fatigue, caused by trying to do life from a powerchair, and the weird angles and strains this causes.
But a simple physio exam doesn't reveal #PEM or the cumulative impact of day-to-day life.
But a simple physio exam doesn't reveal #PEM or the cumulative impact of day-to-day life.
December 1, 2025 at 12:13 PM
I had a physio exam recently for my shoulders. I'm struggling with pain and fatigue, caused by trying to do life from a powerchair, and the weird angles and strains this causes.
But a simple physio exam doesn't reveal #PEM or the cumulative impact of day-to-day life.
But a simple physio exam doesn't reveal #PEM or the cumulative impact of day-to-day life.
How does the physio know there was 'no difficulty'? There could have been pain. The patient may have felt it necessary to comply with removing the jumper in order to get a thorough examination, and then explained the pain/fatigue/stiffness when asked for specific movements.
December 1, 2025 at 12:12 PM
How does the physio know there was 'no difficulty'? There could have been pain. The patient may have felt it necessary to comply with removing the jumper in order to get a thorough examination, and then explained the pain/fatigue/stiffness when asked for specific movements.
"Once in the mindset of “I’m too sick to work”, it’s very hard to get back out."
Is it though? Do we actually have evidence of that? Real evidence, not healthy people putting their own interpretations onto the internal reality of living with chronic illness?
Is it though? Do we actually have evidence of that? Real evidence, not healthy people putting their own interpretations onto the internal reality of living with chronic illness?
December 1, 2025 at 10:18 AM
"Once in the mindset of “I’m too sick to work”, it’s very hard to get back out."
Is it though? Do we actually have evidence of that? Real evidence, not healthy people putting their own interpretations onto the internal reality of living with chronic illness?
Is it though? Do we actually have evidence of that? Real evidence, not healthy people putting their own interpretations onto the internal reality of living with chronic illness?
For a GP to conclude that there isn't enough evidence to support a sick note requires a much more thorough examination and patient history than "I'm going to deny your experience based off one short observation and no questioning of your symptoms."
December 1, 2025 at 10:08 AM
For a GP to conclude that there isn't enough evidence to support a sick note requires a much more thorough examination and patient history than "I'm going to deny your experience based off one short observation and no questioning of your symptoms."
A GP whose first response to someone expressing a problem is to deny the problem rather than query how the presentation (patient walked a short distance) compares to reality (is it reliable & repeatable; what about long distances; is there pain or muscle weakness) is a poor GP.
December 1, 2025 at 10:06 AM
A GP whose first response to someone expressing a problem is to deny the problem rather than query how the presentation (patient walked a short distance) compares to reality (is it reliable & repeatable; what about long distances; is there pain or muscle weakness) is a poor GP.
Can you share the intrinsic problems? I'm in the process of applying to the council for a Disabled Facilities Grant, and I imagine they'll want to push a wetroom on me. I do need a wheelchair accessible bathroom, but it needs to be usable.
November 24, 2025 at 12:40 PM
Can you share the intrinsic problems? I'm in the process of applying to the council for a Disabled Facilities Grant, and I imagine they'll want to push a wetroom on me. I do need a wheelchair accessible bathroom, but it needs to be usable.
It's good to see State Pension shown separately to working-age Social Security. So often, politicians and commentators combine the two to justify arguing against working-age SS, whilst ignoring that SP is much larger.
November 24, 2025 at 12:38 PM
It's good to see State Pension shown separately to working-age Social Security. So often, politicians and commentators combine the two to justify arguing against working-age SS, whilst ignoring that SP is much larger.
A Bureaucratic State may be a viable option to a Welfare State, though I rarely see anyone argue for it without also wanting a Welfare State to protect those who still fall through the cracks. More typically, people who don't want a Welfare State also hate a Bureaucratic State.
November 24, 2025 at 12:34 PM
A Bureaucratic State may be a viable option to a Welfare State, though I rarely see anyone argue for it without also wanting a Welfare State to protect those who still fall through the cracks. More typically, people who don't want a Welfare State also hate a Bureaucratic State.
But if you want pre-distribution to be so good that almost no-one is poor, and the few who are poor are there by vicissitudes of life that can be solved by the church, then you're going to need an awful lot of law and enforcement of that law. A very bureaucratic State.
November 24, 2025 at 12:33 PM
But if you want pre-distribution to be so good that almost no-one is poor, and the few who are poor are there by vicissitudes of life that can be solved by the church, then you're going to need an awful lot of law and enforcement of that law. A very bureaucratic State.
One might argue that the ideal is 'pre-distribution'. This would mean business regulations that stop people from accruing large amounts of wealth to themselves, e.g. via minimum wage and limits on how much the top earner in a company can earn relative to the bottom earner.
November 24, 2025 at 12:29 PM
One might argue that the ideal is 'pre-distribution'. This would mean business regulations that stop people from accruing large amounts of wealth to themselves, e.g. via minimum wage and limits on how much the top earner in a company can earn relative to the bottom earner.
But then you say, "Yet although the idea that the poor should be provided for is a biblical one, the belief that this must be done through state-enforced redistribution is not."
And that's where I have to disagree. As stated above, God gave clear state-enforced redistribution.
And that's where I have to disagree. As stated above, God gave clear state-enforced redistribution.
November 24, 2025 at 12:28 PM
But then you say, "Yet although the idea that the poor should be provided for is a biblical one, the belief that this must be done through state-enforced redistribution is not."
And that's where I have to disagree. As stated above, God gave clear state-enforced redistribution.
And that's where I have to disagree. As stated above, God gave clear state-enforced redistribution.
You seem to recognise the State's role to some extent, when you say, "Of course, rulers should seek to prevent the vulnerable from being exploited - this was a requirement for Old Testament kings."
Naturally, this requires law.
(It was also a requirement for pagan rulers)
Naturally, this requires law.
(It was also a requirement for pagan rulers)
November 24, 2025 at 12:27 PM
You seem to recognise the State's role to some extent, when you say, "Of course, rulers should seek to prevent the vulnerable from being exploited - this was a requirement for Old Testament kings."
Naturally, this requires law.
(It was also a requirement for pagan rulers)
Naturally, this requires law.
(It was also a requirement for pagan rulers)
If a government wants to run a country based on NAIRU, then it owes something to the people whom it has deliberately put out of work.
It is not the church's responsibility to bail out people whom the State has made unemployed. It is the church's prophetic role to call that out.
It is not the church's responsibility to bail out people whom the State has made unemployed. It is the church's prophetic role to call that out.
November 24, 2025 at 12:26 PM
If a government wants to run a country based on NAIRU, then it owes something to the people whom it has deliberately put out of work.
It is not the church's responsibility to bail out people whom the State has made unemployed. It is the church's prophetic role to call that out.
It is not the church's responsibility to bail out people whom the State has made unemployed. It is the church's prophetic role to call that out.
For example, economists like to talk about the 'Non-Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment'. Nairu tells us that we need a certain level of unemployment in order to control inflation. Those unemployed people are sacrificed by the State to some sense of a 'greater good'.
November 24, 2025 at 12:23 PM
For example, economists like to talk about the 'Non-Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment'. Nairu tells us that we need a certain level of unemployment in order to control inflation. Those unemployed people are sacrificed by the State to some sense of a 'greater good'.
So we are left with the Church, ending poverty on its own.
How is it to do that?
The experience of multitudes of poverty-relief workers over centuries of work will tell you that charity has its limits when the issue is a society set up to impoverish some for the gain of others.
How is it to do that?
The experience of multitudes of poverty-relief workers over centuries of work will tell you that charity has its limits when the issue is a society set up to impoverish some for the gain of others.
November 24, 2025 at 12:21 PM
So we are left with the Church, ending poverty on its own.
How is it to do that?
The experience of multitudes of poverty-relief workers over centuries of work will tell you that charity has its limits when the issue is a society set up to impoverish some for the gain of others.
How is it to do that?
The experience of multitudes of poverty-relief workers over centuries of work will tell you that charity has its limits when the issue is a society set up to impoverish some for the gain of others.
So we are left with the church becoming the sole fixer of poverty in the UK.
How is the church to do that? There are three options:
1) Charity, i.e. responding to individual need by donating;
2) Education, i.e. teaching the poor how not to be poor;
3) Working for systemic change
How is the church to do that? There are three options:
1) Charity, i.e. responding to individual need by donating;
2) Education, i.e. teaching the poor how not to be poor;
3) Working for systemic change
November 24, 2025 at 12:16 PM
So we are left with the church becoming the sole fixer of poverty in the UK.
How is the church to do that? There are three options:
1) Charity, i.e. responding to individual need by donating;
2) Education, i.e. teaching the poor how not to be poor;
3) Working for systemic change
How is the church to do that? There are three options:
1) Charity, i.e. responding to individual need by donating;
2) Education, i.e. teaching the poor how not to be poor;
3) Working for systemic change
This segregation of the poor into poor families and poor communities has another issue: in your recommendation, the rich cease to have any responsibility for the poor, because the poor aren't in *their* family, and nor do the poor live in *their* community.
November 24, 2025 at 12:11 PM
This segregation of the poor into poor families and poor communities has another issue: in your recommendation, the rich cease to have any responsibility for the poor, because the poor aren't in *their* family, and nor do the poor live in *their* community.
Poverty is a rarely a case of a poor individual with an otherwise wealthy family, in an otherwise wealthy area. It's usually a poor person, whose family is poor, living in a poor and deprived area. Family & community have too many demands to solve any given individual's poverty.
November 24, 2025 at 12:10 PM
Poverty is a rarely a case of a poor individual with an otherwise wealthy family, in an otherwise wealthy area. It's usually a poor person, whose family is poor, living in a poor and deprived area. Family & community have too many demands to solve any given individual's poverty.
When you say that 'community' should take responsibility for the poor, what is that 'community'? People in a geographic area? How big an area? Council ward, local authority, combined authorities, nation?
People of the same ethnic heritage?
People of the same religion?
Same age?
People of the same ethnic heritage?
People of the same religion?
Same age?
November 24, 2025 at 12:09 PM
When you say that 'community' should take responsibility for the poor, what is that 'community'? People in a geographic area? How big an area? Council ward, local authority, combined authorities, nation?
People of the same ethnic heritage?
People of the same religion?
Same age?
People of the same ethnic heritage?
People of the same religion?
Same age?
I also wonder, when you say that 'family, community and Church' should take responsibility for the poor, exactly how you see that happening?
How extended is that family? My second or third cousin? My great-niece or nephew? Where does 'family' stop?
What if the family is too poor?
How extended is that family? My second or third cousin? My great-niece or nephew? Where does 'family' stop?
What if the family is too poor?
November 24, 2025 at 12:07 PM
I also wonder, when you say that 'family, community and Church' should take responsibility for the poor, exactly how you see that happening?
How extended is that family? My second or third cousin? My great-niece or nephew? Where does 'family' stop?
What if the family is too poor?
How extended is that family? My second or third cousin? My great-niece or nephew? Where does 'family' stop?
What if the family is too poor?
No-one in Israelite times could lose their home and land in perpetuity. This stands in stark contrast to Joseph's behaviour during the famine, which Joseph used to amass the people's land to the Pharaoh, thus impoverishing the people.
This is a State-level law, not charity.
This is a State-level law, not charity.
November 24, 2025 at 12:05 PM
No-one in Israelite times could lose their home and land in perpetuity. This stands in stark contrast to Joseph's behaviour during the famine, which Joseph used to amass the people's land to the Pharaoh, thus impoverishing the people.
This is a State-level law, not charity.
This is a State-level law, not charity.