Sam
banner
spinebusterkeaton.bsky.social
Sam
@spinebusterkeaton.bsky.social
340 followers 410 following 3.6K posts
I enjoy all the meats of our cultural stew. London-based. Film, television, games, politics, Charlton Athletic Football Club. He/him.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
[Guy Fawkes falls and breaks his neck]

Get a load of this fucking guy.
Genuinely indistinguishable from MAGA trolls, it’s incredible.
It’s important to have clearly demarcated Law Obeyance Zones.
It’s hard but you know it’s the right thing to do.
It’s SO GOOD. That whole series is fucking GORGEOUS!
Ooh, is this an Alex Maleev piece?
I will say Kate’s traumatic childhood story about - if memory serves - Abraham Lincoln’s birthday is an all-time bit of self-parody.

I remember someone pasting her story from the original film on an old forum and people claiming it was creepypasta because it’s so extreme.
youtu.be/x01l_jMhjVM?...

“You just like a child, you have the *brain* of a child” is something I find myself saying internally a lot.
Key & Peele - "Gremlins 2" Brainstorm - Uncensored
YouTube video by Comedy Central
youtu.be
“May I explain how binary search works?”
“I’d rather you didn’t.”
I just looked it up and yeah, that’s basically just a plot summary.

Fortunately I am gifted/cursed to forget a blurb moments after having read it.
Yeah, agree on that much, and entirely prepared to accept I’ve overindexed on ‘Twitter is not real life’ given recent events. As in, it’s still not, but it has a tendency to bleed across in ugly ways.
A rare disagreement - I’ve long thought Poppy Watch was the first panel and poppy culture the second.
I have more (but still little) sympathy for the private school thing because I could see someone somehow scraping together the money for one and not being absurdly wealthy. Inheritance tax as is by definition only affects the very, very, very wealthy - and even then has lots of obvious loopholes.
Sorry, should say ‘estates’ rather than ‘households’.
I guess I would say that taxing inheritance at such a high level (or indeed even lower) that it affects ~4% of households (or indeed multiples more) doesn’t in my view encroach on autonomy or looking after your kids (unless they have very expensive tastes).
I say this as someone to who inheritance tax may actually… apply:

I’ve always thought it kind of grubby how bent of shape people get about what is basically a big pile of free money they did nothing to earn (and as a result think thresholds should be lower but good fucking luck).
It’s peculiar. I wouldn’t expect developers to continue to support online games indefinitely because, with rare exceptions, it’s obviously impractical. But then I’d also consider it fair to get a refund when Concord goes tits up after a week. So the question is: where do you draw the line.
And yet I’m going to demonstrate an incredible resistance to such thinking when I say:

I think people have been trained by Labour leaders, not least the incumbent, to see a leadership hopeful making any sort of left wing noise and go, “Nice barefaced lies for self-advancement you have there.”
Yeah, if anything, grasping the nettle is the least characteristic thing for this government to do.

“They’ll do the thing they’ve already repeatedly done” seems a safer bet.
The part of me that’s unconcerned with the human and environmental cost and the practicalities besides (and presumably votes Reform) kind of wants to see the big, stupid thing built.
Classic Ross and Rachel (Reeves).
YouTube Premium really is one of my most important barriers against bullshit, it seems.
You laugh now but I’d like to see your reaction when there’s no wall to keep the kaiju out.
My first knowledge of it was this morning. “Turns out this plainly mental thing is not gonna work.” No shit!
To be fair, the schmoozing aspect is probably less fun when at every party you’re the person who just pops up intermittently to tell the industry it sucks and needs to do a better job.