The all-powerful child is a well-worn horror trope, but the author manages to squeeze a solid plot and some very evocative imagery out of it. Biggest complaint is that the protagonist is an annoying actor-improviser stereotype. The afterward leads me to believe that so is the author.
The all-powerful child is a well-worn horror trope, but the author manages to squeeze a solid plot and some very evocative imagery out of it. Biggest complaint is that the protagonist is an annoying actor-improviser stereotype. The afterward leads me to believe that so is the author.
Bryson is great at what he does. My only two complaints? He ends of disease and death, which left me unsettled. And he reads his own book… and as an American who spent most of his life in Britain, he doesn’t have an accent, but he DOES pronounce a number of words the English way. Odd.
Bryson is great at what he does. My only two complaints? He ends of disease and death, which left me unsettled. And he reads his own book… and as an American who spent most of his life in Britain, he doesn’t have an accent, but he DOES pronounce a number of words the English way. Odd.
Sometimes I can’t quite get a bead on Sedaris. Surely one of the funniest writers alive. But as he writes about topics like his sister’s suicide, I sometimes feel like his blunt openness is just another facade to hide behind. He confounds me.
Sometimes I can’t quite get a bead on Sedaris. Surely one of the funniest writers alive. But as he writes about topics like his sister’s suicide, I sometimes feel like his blunt openness is just another facade to hide behind. He confounds me.
More non-fiction. Very interesting, if oddly written. The same author, looking at the same topic - often using the same examples and anecdotes - but through a variety of different lenses. Felt kinda… recursive?
More non-fiction. Very interesting, if oddly written. The same author, looking at the same topic - often using the same examples and anecdotes - but through a variety of different lenses. Felt kinda… recursive?
My therapist is urging me to work more non-fiction into my reading, so I started here. Do I now understand Quantum Physics? Absolutely not. But I think I now don’t understand it a little bit better. A quick and wittily written read.
My therapist is urging me to work more non-fiction into my reading, so I started here. Do I now understand Quantum Physics? Absolutely not. But I think I now don’t understand it a little bit better. A quick and wittily written read.
Book seemed very familiar right away… about halfway through realized that yes, I had read this in the last couple years. Still: really wonderful, creepy, highly original stories. Struck by the way many of them don’t have an ending so much as just… stop.
Book seemed very familiar right away… about halfway through realized that yes, I had read this in the last couple years. Still: really wonderful, creepy, highly original stories. Struck by the way many of them don’t have an ending so much as just… stop.
4 novellas, 2 already made into films. My main complaint of King’s full novels is that they tend to sprawl. Not the case here. Delightful.
4 novellas, 2 already made into films. My main complaint of King’s full novels is that they tend to sprawl. Not the case here. Delightful.
Accidentally found myself reading a “teen chick lit” horror novel, but not mad at it. Nice character development, an original plot, and one of the least forced-feeling romance sub-plots I’ve read in some time. And well-read on the audio, which makes a huge difference.
Accidentally found myself reading a “teen chick lit” horror novel, but not mad at it. Nice character development, an original plot, and one of the least forced-feeling romance sub-plots I’ve read in some time. And well-read on the audio, which makes a huge difference.
Enjoyed it. Past and present play out in parallel as a woman returns to a childhood home her father claimed was haunted and wrote a book about. Lots of questionably reliable narrators, creating a fun tension around whether it was indeed haunted or not, and the implications of that.
Enjoyed it. Past and present play out in parallel as a woman returns to a childhood home her father claimed was haunted and wrote a book about. Lots of questionably reliable narrators, creating a fun tension around whether it was indeed haunted or not, and the implications of that.
As a fan of SGJ’s later work, it was interesting to read one of his earliest. I also struggled to finish. This was suffused with a slick, cynical self-awareness that felt like it was trying way too hard to be cool. Glad he grew out of that.
As a fan of SGJ’s later work, it was interesting to read one of his earliest. I also struggled to finish. This was suffused with a slick, cynical self-awareness that felt like it was trying way too hard to be cool. Glad he grew out of that.
It was fine. Supernatural escape room(house) revenge horror. Seemed like it was maybe going to say something interesting about perspective/memory/gaslighting/wholiveswhodieswhotellsyourstory… then didn’t.
It was fine. Supernatural escape room(house) revenge horror. Seemed like it was maybe going to say something interesting about perspective/memory/gaslighting/wholiveswhodieswhotellsyourstory… then didn’t.
A truly original and horrific take on the Christian mythos, against the backdrop of plague-era France. Gets kind wild in its late chapters, but never totally loses the thread.
A truly original and horrific take on the Christian mythos, against the backdrop of plague-era France. Gets kind wild in its late chapters, but never totally loses the thread.
Started strong, with an examination of the mechanisms of habit… though short on practical guidance. But then goes downhill, positively presenting the darks arts of retail manipulation and social religious indocrination, and treating addiction dismissively as just another habit. Ugh.
Started strong, with an examination of the mechanisms of habit… though short on practical guidance. But then goes downhill, positively presenting the darks arts of retail manipulation and social religious indocrination, and treating addiction dismissively as just another habit. Ugh.
Despite being set largely in the Twin Cities and NY in the early 2000s —very relatable — and the quality of the writing, the whole thing was a slog. Probably because there wasn’t a single likable character… generally a dealbreaker for me.
Despite being set largely in the Twin Cities and NY in the early 2000s —very relatable — and the quality of the writing, the whole thing was a slog. Probably because there wasn’t a single likable character… generally a dealbreaker for me.
The first twist had me “Hell yes,” the second, “Oh, cool, “ the third, “Oh!The remainder… felt arbitrary and performative.
I would still give it 4/5.
The first twist had me “Hell yes,” the second, “Oh, cool, “ the third, “Oh!The remainder… felt arbitrary and performative.
I would still give it 4/5.
minnesotafringe.org/shows/2025/f...
minnesotafringe.org/shows/2025/f...
minnesotafringe.org/shows/2025/f...
minnesotafringe.org/shows/2025/f...