www.softmachines.org
A blogpost arguing this would be a big mistake; instead they should take even more seriously their role supporting regional economies.
www.softmachines.org/wordpress/?p...
"The focus has built deep advanced manufacturing ecosystems around scaling and integration into the real economy, rather than ‘blue sky’ science..."
www.ft.com/content/3ecc...
"The focus has built deep advanced manufacturing ecosystems around scaling and integration into the real economy, rather than ‘blue sky’ science..."
www.ft.com/content/3ecc...
www.ips-journal.eu/work-and-dig...
www.ips-journal.eu/work-and-dig...
(Also, please join my campaign against plotting the derivative of noisy data)
(Also, please join my campaign against plotting the derivative of noisy data)
It could, however, have been much shorter.
Along the lines of:
"As figure 5.2 shows, the OBR's productivity forecasts have zero credibility & should be ignored."
It could, however, have been much shorter.
Along the lines of:
"As figure 5.2 shows, the OBR's productivity forecasts have zero credibility & should be ignored."
Our problem - we didn't invest in the future, & now the future has arrived.
Now we need to move from consumption led growth to investment led growth.
Our problem - we didn't invest in the future, & now the future has arrived.
Now we need to move from consumption led growth to investment led growth.
on Thursday.
softmachines.org?p=3192
on Thursday.
softmachines.org?p=3192
softmachines.org?p=3192
softmachines.org?p=3192
I argue that a multi-decade period of consensus in UK science policy is likely soon to come to an end.
We must respond to a new focus on re-building, re-energising, re-arming and re-industrialising for a changed & hostile world
softmachines.org?p=3192
I argue that a multi-decade period of consensus in UK science policy is likely soon to come to an end.
We must respond to a new focus on re-building, re-energising, re-arming and re-industrialising for a changed & hostile world
softmachines.org?p=3192
(This plot from @IfMCambridge's 2025 Innovation report)
www.ciip.group.cam.ac.uk/innovation/u...
(This plot from @IfMCambridge's 2025 Innovation report)
www.ciip.group.cam.ac.uk/innovation/u...
Only two sectors showed any overall increase in total factor productivity between 1995 & 2020:
manufacturing, & information/communication
Only two sectors showed any overall increase in total factor productivity between 1995 & 2020:
manufacturing, & information/communication
Yes (imv), but it's important to distinguish some good arguments for this from bad ones (and recognise some uncertainties)
my blogpost:
softmachines.org?p=3180
Yes (imv), but it's important to distinguish some good arguments for this from bad ones (and recognise some uncertainties)
my blogpost:
softmachines.org?p=3180
Yes (imv), but it's important to distinguish some good arguments for this from bad ones (and recognise some uncertainties)
my blogpost: softmachines.org
Yes (imv), but it's important to distinguish some good arguments for this from bad ones (and recognise some uncertainties)
my blogpost: softmachines.org
But why is this the case? And what can we learn for the UK productivity problem?
Short 🧵
1/5
But why is this the case? And what can we learn for the UK productivity problem?
Short 🧵
1/5
softmachines.org?p=3177
softmachines.org?p=3177
"the laureates have taught us that sustained growth cannot be taken for granted"
softmachines.org?p=3173
"the laureates have taught us that sustained growth cannot be taken for granted"
softmachines.org?p=3173
"the laureates have taught us that sustained growth cannot be taken for granted"
softmachines.org?p=3173
"the laureates have taught us that sustained growth cannot be taken for granted"
softmachines.org?p=3173
Earlier this year I suggested 3 scenarios for AI:
1. Intelligence explosion
2. Excel in prose
3. Crash and burn
It's Silicon Valley's belief in 1 that makes 3 more likely
My piece:
softmachines.org?p=3125
Earlier this year I suggested 3 scenarios for AI:
1. Intelligence explosion
2. Excel in prose
3. Crash and burn
It's Silicon Valley's belief in 1 that makes 3 more likely
My piece:
softmachines.org?p=3125
Earlier this year I suggested 3 scenarios for AI:
1. Intelligence explosion
2. Excel in prose
3. Crash and burn
It's Silicon Valley's belief in 1 that makes 3 more likely
My piece:
softmachines.org?p=3125
Earlier this year I suggested 3 scenarios for AI:
1. Intelligence explosion
2. Excel in prose
3. Crash and burn
It's Silicon Valley's belief in 1 that makes 3 more likely
My piece:
softmachines.org?p=3125
🔗 www.productivity.ac.uk/research/lab...
🔗 www.productivity.ac.uk/research/lab...
The answer probably won't surprise you...
The answer probably won't surprise you...
Cause is the productivity slowdown - without that we'd all be 36% richer
Maybe there's something to learn from Greater Manchester's outperformance in productivity growth
Cause is the productivity slowdown - without that we'd all be 36% richer
Maybe there's something to learn from Greater Manchester's outperformance in productivity growth
www.linkedin.com/pulse/though...
www.linkedin.com/pulse/though...
🧵
1/13
🧵
1/13
profserious.substack.com/p/on-our-soc...
profserious.substack.com/p/on-our-soc...