Reyzl Grace | Завета Грейс
@reyzlgrace.bsky.social
680 followers 81 following 1.1K posts
Russian American writer, translator, and aspiring lesbian tradwife to @erswrites.bsky.social. Into Silver Age/early Soviet art & lit, theology & church history, Steely Dan. Twice dubbed "the Simone Biles of sex". Россия будет свободной. www.reyzlgrace.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
reyzlgrace.bsky.social
A lot of people's inability to grasp the Trinity suggests to me that they are not doing enough fun role-play with their partners.
reyzlgrace.bsky.social
Unquestionably true of them. I have not been talking about them.
reyzlgrace.bsky.social
Oh, I'm *definitely* not running any apologetics for them.
reyzlgrace.bsky.social
Yeah, Edith Stein and Sophia Parnok were really hellbent on destroying the Jewish people. 🙄
reyzlgrace.bsky.social
That would seem to allow for Messianics, then.
reyzlgrace.bsky.social
That's fair. Because of my background, I tend to think of E. European Jews who converted to Catholicism or Orthodoxy but still felt connected to their communities & understood themselves as culturally/ethnically Ashkenazi--people who had icons in their houses but still quoted Sholem Aleichem.
reyzlgrace.bsky.social
Historically, though, it was also a lot of people who converted but still spoke Yiddish/Ladino/Hebrew/etc., and still cared about the community, and didn't want to be exiled for their consciences.
reyzlgrace.bsky.social
So that would put us at, "Christian Jews are still Jews, but the rabbis don't like the way they do it." That makes sense to me.

(Though, as an aside, Christians *don't* believe in more than one God. They believe in the same, one God.)
to.me
reyzlgrace.bsky.social
Undoubtedly. But Florence's position made Jews lose status for converting to Christianity, but not for atheism. I hear this commonly. Why is not believing in Jesus seemingly the *only* non-negotiable, essential Jewish belief(/practice) above all others?
reyzlgrace.bsky.social
I'm asking, "Why does accepting Christian teaching make someone not Jewish?" (Especially in the eyes of people who do still regard atheist Jews as Jewish, or Jews who practice Buddhism as Jewish, etc.)
reyzlgrace.bsky.social
Which, coming back to the original point of the thread, is not a renunciation of his Jewishness. It's an understanding of Christianity as completely compatible with it.
reyzlgrace.bsky.social
Jesus isn't a god before him. He's literally the same God.
reyzlgrace.bsky.social
For Paul, there isn't an "old one" and a "new one"--there's just one ongoing revelation of God to the world.
reyzlgrace.bsky.social
I mean that, as far as I understand, the ontology of Krishna is more similar to "the angel of the Lord" in the Tanakh--not an illusion, but a manifestation in which the manifest divinity appears in human form but is not human. Jesus isn't embodied instrumentally, but essentially in his own nature.
reyzlgrace.bsky.social
He is "true man" in a way that Krishna, for example, is not.
reyzlgrace.bsky.social
His physical "beingness" *wasn't* "overwritten", though. That's the entire point of the Incarnation.
reyzlgrace.bsky.social
An avatar isn't ontologically embodied. Claiming Jesus was an avatar was defined as a heresy (docetism).
reyzlgrace.bsky.social
I mean, if "There is no God and he did nothing for us," is alright, it's hard to see how "The Torah has some typos" will be beyond the Pale.
reyzlgrace.bsky.social
I would argue that conversion to Islam is also not intrinsically a renunciation of Jewish identity.
reyzlgrace.bsky.social
They have essentially the same attitude to Mosaic Law--one deeply at odds with most historical understandings of valid Jewish praxis.