Rev. Magdalen
@revmagdalen.bsky.social
9.3K followers 7.4K following 61K posts
🌊 Anti-Fascist #Resist #SubGenius Creator of Israel-Hamas War feed: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:rmnjia7e5eh3jamsizupx5yc/feed/aaalrzaywm6ls And a US Politics feed: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:rmnjia7e5eh3jamsizupx5yc/feed/aaai4nqpmaptk
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
revmagdalen.bsky.social
On the topic of organizing in groups, here's a really great summary of what to watch out for. ANY kind of group can become a high control group, and it's on a spectrum. They're not all Jonestown . But if your group has multiple of these traits, it's probably toxic.
The 25 Signs you’re in a High-Control Group or Cult by Anastasia Somerville-Wong
It is a really healthy and rewarding thing to be part of a movement for positive change and progress, and to be part of a community which encourages moral and spiritual growth. It can do wonders fo…
secularliturgies.wordpress.com
revmagdalen.bsky.social
Remember that time the FBI indicted the 2016 Russian Troll Farm, and part of the evidence showed that the troll farm had learned that they didn't need to spend time bothering to write reasoned arguments, "Hillary is a Satan" worked just as well?
atrupar.com
Trump: "They have the devil's ideology. They become violent on the left."
Reposted by Rev. Magdalen
atrupar.com
Trump: "They have the devil's ideology. They become violent on the left."
Reposted by Rev. Magdalen
atrupar.com
Trump opens the Charlie Kirk memorial event: "This is the first time we've been at the new and improved Rose Garden. And people are loving it. They are loving it like they have not loved a lot of things."
revmagdalen.bsky.social
They made an open public post about "liberal Zionists." I'm a liberal Zionist, why wouldn't I reply and engage with other people who replied? What did you think we were even doing on this website? It is for Discourse.
revmagdalen.bsky.social
You really had no idea there were custom feeds on topics on Bluesky? Yeah, there's no algorithm here, people just create feeds about topics that interest them. That's why engagement is so much higher on here.
revmagdalen.bsky.social
Palestinians aren't asking to be considered citizens of Israel. They want their own state. They just can't have it on land that is already someone else's state, at least not without making a treaty to that effect with that state.
revmagdalen.bsky.social
Why would citizens of Palestine get to vote in Israeli elections? They vote in the Palestinian elections, which the PA has signed a deal to actually start having now.
revmagdalen.bsky.social
Skipped over the "SubGenius" part, eh? Literal-mindedness is so common with you guys, it's a tell of the groupthink.
revmagdalen.bsky.social
And before you go "But it's not a REAL nationality," guess what? That's what many other genocidaires say too, that it doesn't count because that's not a real people. Putin says that about Ukrainians.
revmagdalen.bsky.social
Obviously you don't think genocide is wrong, per se, because you are advocating for one yourselves. That's what it means that you want an entire nationality to cease to exist as such. Forcibly assign them a different nationality against their will, to erase their own, which will no longer exist.
revmagdalen.bsky.social
It IS exhausting watching you guys butcher the English language by using the most extreme words you can think of, without any regard for their actual meaning. So you can simultaneously call for a genocide yourselves ("There should be no such people as Israelis") while claiming to call out genocide.
Reposted by Rev. Magdalen
🇨🇦 🇺🇦 🇵🇦 🇬🇱 🇿🇦 🇵🇸
Swap in any other country and most people can see the U.S. Imperialism.
Hell, most people can smell it!😷
revmagdalen.bsky.social
You want there to be no such people as Israelis. Others want there to be no such people as Jews or Arabs or trans people. It's all morally equivalent, equally bad. Sorry to break it to you, I know it feels really good to have moral license to call for something horrific. But no, it's immoral, sorry.
revmagdalen.bsky.social
And no, it is no way "gaslighting" to tell you that wanting to destroy a national group is morally equivalent to wanting to destroy an ethnicity. They are literally listed next to each other in the genocide law. Look it up.
revmagdalen.bsky.social
I created a feed about the topic of the war, and posts discussing the topic, like OP's, appear there. This is a public town square for discussions.
revmagdalen.bsky.social
The indigenous Jewish people, a globally vulnerable micro-minority that has endured centuries of persecution, had every right to ask for, and be granted, a scrap of their cultural heritage lands, to have a refuge state on.

The descendants of colonizers had no right to object & declare eternal war.
revmagdalen.bsky.social
Phrasing the ending of Israel as just "Making one new, better state," is no different from a white supremacist phrasing ethnic cleansing as "purifying the blood of the nation." It's wrong even if you claim the outcome will be paradise. You don't have the right to destroy other people's states.
revmagdalen.bsky.social
Israel already is a democracy with equal rights for everyone living inside it. Israelis of Arab ethnicity serve in the highest levels of government, and even in the IDF.

Palestine is a separate state, that wants to have a very different type of state and national culture. They should get that too.
revmagdalen.bsky.social
But you don't care right? You have only a vague idea of what the postwar rules-based world order even means, let alone giving a shit about its continued existence, right?
revmagdalen.bsky.social
I'll save you time. Nazi Germany, South Africa, Rhodesia, The Confederacy, right? Yeah none of those are remotely similar to what you are advocating for. What you want is specifically outlawed by the UN Charter itself, so giving you this thing would mean undoing the entire rules-based world order.
revmagdalen.bsky.social
Your thinking process is exactly the same as the so-called "race realist" white supremacists, who have a catechism of "facts" that they whip out whenever confronted about how white supremacy is wrong. Your catechism for why you should get to destroy a state is just as flawed, just as obviously.
revmagdalen.bsky.social
Both Germany and South Africa still exist, still governed solely by their own sovereign peoples. At no point was anyone fighting for, or advocating for, them to cease to exist. Because that would be a serious crime, and it remains fascinating and shocking to see how you talked yourselves into this.
revmagdalen.bsky.social
People can have extremely different political views, while still agreeing that no, there shouldn't be such a thing as the UN, or any state or nonstate actor, unmaking countries by force against the will of the sovereign people of that nation. That should stay a serious crime, not be normalized.
revmagdalen.bsky.social
Only people who want to end the state of Israel by force, against the will of the Israeli people, make there be no such country anymore, think that the people who do NOT want that are part of some specific ideological group, not just "everyone who supports the post-WWII rules-based world order."
revmagdalen.bsky.social
Asking someone if they are "a Zionist" is like asking if they support votes for women. Like...yes, but why are you asking? We already got that 105 years ago?

The only reason to bring it up is if someone wants to UNdo the thing that already happened long ago.