Some philosophers claim that love requires patience, and others claim that true love is marked by impatience. Which one do you think is more accurate in the real world?
Here's a slightly different spin on the old "confidence is attractive" axiom. What do you think? Is it realistically possible to hunt for love, or is it enough to be receptive and live with an open heart?
Here's a spicy one that rejects the "everyone deserves love regardless of personal quality" axiom that's become a modern touchstone. What do you think?
Another interesting turn of phrase: "what" you would be rather than the more traditional "who" you would be. To me, that's an important distinction. Agree or disagree?