@publicintegrity.bsky.social
400 followers 93 following 290 posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
publicintegrity.bsky.social
"We know from the experience in NSW that it's only when upper houses flex their constitutional muscle and perform their constitutional obligations to hold the executive to account that the government has reason to comply."

5/
publicintegrity.bsky.social
"The government has got to know the parliament has teeth or it will just ignore you," she said.

4/
publicintegrity.bsky.social
Professor Appleby pointed to the landmark case of the NSW upper house flexing its muscle in the 1990s when it suspended then-treasurer Michael Egan and removed him from the chamber for refusing to comply with an order to produce documents.

3/
publicintegrity.bsky.social
"If you haven't got parliament also performing its integrity role, then you have lost the coach because parliament is still where it matters," she told AAP.

2/
publicintegrity.bsky.social
The parliament should conduct an independent and comprehensive review of FOI and develop a best practice approach for the access of information that meets the needs of Australia in 2025.

2/
publicintegrity.bsky.social
Opposition Leader, Sussan Ley MP, has written strongly today opposing the FOI reform. The Centre welcomes this position.

This is now an opportunity to reset.

1/

#auspol

www.canberratimes.com.au/story/908628...
www.canberratimes.com.au
publicintegrity.bsky.social
“No supporter outside the government was to be found,” they wrote. The Australian Public Service Commission, Services Australia and the Attorney-General’s Department were the only three stakeholders that appeared to endorse the bill.

2/
publicintegrity.bsky.social
As Catherine Williams and Gabrielle Appleby of the Centre for Public Integrity noted in a piece for The AFR on Tuesday, the Senate inquiry into the bill received “virtually unanimous damning assessments” in its submissions inbox, which closed last week.

1/

#auspol
publicintegrity.bsky.social
What to do instead of this proposal?

Conduct a thorough review. Take into consideration the needs of the public and the needs of the government. Review best practice in other jurisdictions. Do not weaken the pro-disclosre approach.

7/
publicintegrity.bsky.social
4. Cherry-picked reforms:

The proposed amendments have cherry-picked previous proposals and ignored other proposals that are directly relevant.

6/
publicintegrity.bsky.social
3. Cont

These reverse the 2010 amendments, which were intended to level the playing field for applicants.

As former FOI Commissioner John McMillan said, make ‘public requests for documents … a more routine and accepted part of the daily business of government agencies.’

5/
publicintegrity.bsky.social
3. Damaging consequences:

Re-introducing fees and the removal of the ability to make anonymous requests are likely to discourage the use of FOI, particularly by vulnerable and marginalised groups.

4/
publicintegrity.bsky.social
2. No evidence to substantiate changes:

When asked to provide evidence to justify claims of vexatious requests by AI, other non-human actors or by criminal gangs, the gov tabled two articles from the US and (ironically) claimed Cabinet confidentiality for the rest of the docs.

3/
publicintegrity.bsky.social
1. Not addressing structural reform:

Structural reform is required. Repeated reviews recommend it. But it needs to be comprehensive and structural and take input from the public and the government.

2/
publicintegrity.bsky.social
In opposition, the prime minister talked a big game on transparency. It’s about time he walked the walk on open government.

~ Opinion piece by the Centre's ED Dr Catherine Williams and Research Director Professor Gabrielle Appleby

#auspol

www.afr.com/politics/fed...
Labor must drop flawed and friendless freedom of information bill
In opposition, the prime minister talked a big game on transparency. It’s about time he walked the walk on open government.
www.afr.com
publicintegrity.bsky.social
Professor Peter Greste, Executive Director, Alliance for Journalists' Freedom

“FOI has been a critical but deeply flawed tool for journalists wanting to get behind the curtain of government. We all welcome better transparency, but this is not the way forward.”

11/
publicintegrity.bsky.social
Cont:

"This bill is bad news for every Australian and should be withdrawn or tossed out by the Parliament.”

10/
publicintegrity.bsky.social
Madeleine Burkitt, Senior Campaigner, Grata Fund

"FOI absolutely needs reform, but this takes us backwards. Absurdly, the Government is pointing to Robodebt to justify these changes, but the Royal Commission called for the exact opposite of what’s proposed.

9/
publicintegrity.bsky.social
Cont:

"Information is to democratic participation as water is to life. People often take water for granted, until it stops flowing."

8/
publicintegrity.bsky.social
Rex Patrick, Founder, Whistleblower Justice Fund (
@mrrexpatrick.bsky.social) :

"Albanese called for greater transparency whilst in opposition, but his Secrecy Bill does the exact opposite, entrenching secrecy in government. The Opposition and Crossbench must unite to block this bill."

7/