Paul Seaward
@pseaward.bsky.social
1.1K followers 670 following 150 posts
History of Parliament, parliamentarism and politics in Britain and Europe from the middle ages to now; C17th English political thought and political history; Clarendon, Hobbes. A parliamentary miscellany at https://historyofparliamentblog.wordpress.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
pseaward.bsky.social
Among all the treasures in Hansard, this one, an account of the disasters endured by members of the House of Lords attending the Naval Review at Spithead in 1858, is priceless:
hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/1856-0...
The Naval Review - Hansard - UK Parliament
Hansard record of the item : 'The Naval Review' on Thursday 24 April 1856.
hansard.parliament.uk
Reposted by Paul Seaward
histparl.bsky.social
The History of Parliament team were very sad to hear of the recent death of Professor Michael Rush.

A pioneering scholar of parliament, Professor Rush's work on the social background of MPs and resulting Database stands as a fundamental source for generations of historians and political scientists.
pseaward.bsky.social
Sort of, yes; though there are very many unmemorable moments, and the idea that the Lords is all that much better at scrutinising legislation is in my view a bit overblown.
pseaward.bsky.social
though I suppose there is the counter-example of Henry Brougham's 6 hour speech on law reform.
pseaward.bsky.social
Yes indeed: I suppose my point is that the chamber just isn't the sort of place where one can ever expect policy to be discussed except in the most obvious and political and defensive ways, and never has been.
pseaward.bsky.social
and while it's probably true that there have been people in the past who were much better at giving speeches whether in the H of C or at conference, I suspect that's got much more to do with traditions of platform oratory now lost than with the operation of the chamber then and now.
pseaward.bsky.social
Well I agree entirely; I'm certainly not saying it's good - just that I can't really think of how a chamber discussion in a large assembly could operate in a much better fashion without unrealistic levels of seriousness and unpolitical-ness and lack of self-promotion from those elected to it
pseaward.bsky.social
I think that is how it works now, albeit not perfectly, and the ideas (naturally and properly) are properly examined elsewhere. Expecting it to work as a place of very serious discussion is a sort of category mistake (though evidently that wasn't quite what you meant).
pseaward.bsky.social
Well OK, fair enough, and I agree about the facebook video entirely. But it means the chamber is being used not as a place for an exchange of views in which the ideas are seriously discussed, but a theatre in which they are thrown out without (immediate) response...
pseaward.bsky.social
But the chamber of the House of Commons never was and never could be a place to be an effective legislator and thinker. It's not really what it can be for. It's for (and has been since the at least the late C18th) the presentation of a case to the public, not for the creative discussion of them.
stephenkb.bsky.social
It's become self-fulfilling. It ought to be one of the places they are most effective, but because it has become a place of 'now to give a speech for the Facebook video', it isn't a place to be an effective legislator and thinker. I don't know how we can fix that.
pseaward.bsky.social
Could even make the problem a little bit worse, if it is seen in more straightforward penalty terms, rather than ethical ones: the loss of severance pay comes to seem an acceptable price for taking a very substantial job immediately.
Reposted by Paul Seaward
Reposted by Paul Seaward
plantlifeuk.bsky.social
📢 Lugg Meadow, the UK’s largest remaining Lammas meadow, is under threat from housing plans. A rare habitat, rich in wildlife and tradition, could be irreversibly damaged.

🚫 We’ve objected to the proposal. Now it’s your turn.
👉 Have your say: https://loom.ly/-yNvG6g
A wide meadow filled with bright yellow wildflowers under a blue sky with scattered white clouds, bordered by green trees in the distance. Photo credit: Chris Harris. A Eurasian curlew standing in a grassy field, showing its long, downward-curved bill and mottled brown plumage. Photo credit: Bahadir Yeniceri Close-up of a cluster of small white flowers from a narrow-leaved water-dropwort plant, with green blurred foliage in the background. Photo credit: Nahhan. Close-up of bright yellow buttercup flowers in a meadow, with a soft-focus background of more yellow blooms. Photo credit: Chris Harris.
Reposted by Paul Seaward
brodiewaddell.bsky.social
Who did what in early modern England?

New #OpenAccess book, 'The Experience of Work in Early Modern England' by @jwhittle.bsky.social, @markhailwood.bsky.social, @hkrobb.bsky.social & @aucointaylor.bsky.social, based on thousands of #EarlyModern court depositions 🗃️

Read it: doi.org/10.1017/9781...


This book applies the innovative work-task approach to the history of work, which captures the contribution of all workers and types of work to the early modern economy. Drawing on tens of thousands of court depositions, the authors analyse the individual tasks that made up everyday work for women and men, shedding new light on the gender division of labour, and the ways in which time, space, age and marital status shaped sixteenth and seventeenth-century working life. Combining qualitative and quantitative analysis, the book deepens our understanding of the preindustrial economy, and calls for us to rethink not only who did what, but also the implications of these findings for major debates about structural change, the nature and extent of paid work, and what has been lost as well as gained over the past three centuries of economic development. This title is also available as open access on Cambridge Core.
Cover of Whittle, Jane, Mark Hailwood, Hannah Robb, and Taylor Aucoin. The Experience of Work in Early Modern England. of Cambridge Studies in Economic History - Second Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2025.
Reposted by Paul Seaward
stephenkb.bsky.social
Agree - I am much more concerned about staff budgets (the number one complaint I hear is 'I want to be able to hire a proper office manager'), which I think do create an asymmetry between parliament and government and also make it harder for MPs to be effective.
Reposted by Paul Seaward
stephenkb.bsky.social
I think a lot of this is primarily about what many of us in the media now rewards. I chaired quite a few fringes at Labour conference, and at all of them I walked away impressed by the quality of all the MPs and their contributions.
joxley.jmoxley.co.uk
People talk about getting a "better" political class with little agreement on what that means. I suspect the best change would be getting more people who are seriously interested in policy and government. Surprisingly few MPs actually are.
tpgroberts.bsky.social
This is my issue with politics lately. Basically, every announcement assumes the reader has an utter lack of curiosity or knowledge to the point that it's just meaningless chaff.

The government's immigration policy is now the exact policy they dismissed when Kemi suggested it in spring.