ProfSmudge
@profsmudge.bsky.social
350 followers 200 following 690 posts
School maths should be more than tables and algorithms. I try to write materials that show that. Dietmar Küchemann
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
#MathsUntangle Probably the best fractions task I've ever written (at least I thought so at 4 am this morning....)
In #MathsToday I helped a Y11 student solve inequs like x2+2x–8 < 0, via graphs and factorising to find a range of values on the x-axis. We hammered out a procedure, but it seemed like a completely alien world, a bit like going through a latin mass. If she masters the procedures, what does it prove?
#MathsToday Working with two Y11 students yesterday, we checked to see whether 121 was divisible by 3.
The division 121÷3 gave us 40 r1.
I suggested we could treat the remainder as 1÷3 which proved to be very challenging.
They remind me of this ICCAMS lesson, though your tasks seem mindbogglingly more difficult!
Thank you. I think they held to exactly that naive argument.
In #MathsToday a Y11 pupil said she thought it would be easier to get a grade 5 GCSE on the Higher rather than the Foundation papers. Is there any truth in this??
Nagelsmann nails it....
Manager of a not very good team annoyed by the suggestion that it's not a very good team....
Thank you - though I'm not convinced! I'd have thought it might be easier to see when two angles are identical, when formed by parallel lines, than to see the '180-ness' of a triangle!
I suppose "Here's a conjecture, will we be able to prove it one day?" might excite some pupils!
Interesting....
Tearing up triangles tends to produce a horrible mess as it destroys the triangle, though if used carefully it could provoke the classic proof involving an exterior angle.
I did once meet a teacher who used triangle angle sum to deduce angles on a straight line, but....
"Many courses put the triangle-interior-angle-sum before corres. & alter angles … "
Do they really?? Doesn't seem coherent! Don't we use parallel line properties to prove interior angle sum?
Nice stuff. I was just thinking about this similar task, as part of some work on fractions
I was hoping one could get away with a 'by symmetry' argument, as A'B' is parallel to CB, or would that jar with Euclid's chain of reasoning?!
Here's the beginnings of a dynamic proof of this
I asked whether he could have used common fractions: 1/2 ÷ 8.
He suggested the 'flip...' method, but having changed 1/2 ÷ 8 into the full-blown fractional form 1/2 x 1/8 he wanted to 'fllp' again.
He changed 1/2 to 0.5 and then used the unitary method, but initially found 8÷0.5 where he recognised that the result, 16, didn't make sense.
He then got 0.0625 and 0.375 which he knew was 3/8.
In #MathsToday I used the classic 'cream for 6 people' recipe task with a Y10 student.
'pints' threw him so I changed this to 'litres'.
Taking the extreme cases, it looks like it should be 50....
Nice. Reminds me of this (Durell, 1939, Geometry for Schools)
It's German, Jim, but not as you know it
🔧 Stellenangebot in Berlin:
Administration und Support – Online-Fortbildungsmodule im QuaMath-Programm (E11 TV-L, 75 %)

Ab 01.01.2026, zunächst befristet bis 30.06.2028 mit Option auf Verlängerung um weitere fünf Jahre.

#DZLM #QuaMath #IPN #Stellenangebot #Bildung #DigitalLearning #ITSupport
Administration und Support der Online-Fortbildungsmodule im QuaMath-Programm
www.leibniz-ipn.de
Dee La Warr Pavilion, Bexhill. A day at the seaside.
I've had another look at this. Given your algebraic solution, that the area = 4 = 2², then we must be able to show that the 'houses' fit on the two (red) squares on the sides of your green right-angled triangle with hypotenuse 2:
This is all a bit Alice in Wonderland. An 'independent review' says Oak need more funds to publicise their resources, on the strange notion that the resources are worth publicising