Pablo Magaña
@pmagana94.bsky.social
710 followers 1.1K following 180 posts
Political philosopher | IRC postdoctoral fellow at Trinity College Dublin | Animals, future generations, and democratic theory | Also, memes and shitposting. https://sites.google.com/view/pablomagana
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
pmagana94.bsky.social
I am new on Bluesky, so here's a brief (hopefully informative) summary of my research interests:

- The representation of animals and the unborn.
- How (if at all) should theories of political legitimacy take animals into account.
- The "demos" of democratic firms (e.g. workers, stakeholders...?).
pmagana94.bsky.social
Dear grant-designers, I've no idea what "intellectual mobility" is. No metaphors in applications, please. Be poetic at home if you wish. I don't have the time, nor the willingness, to decipher hieroglyphics. Thanks.
pmagana94.bsky.social
This is a thoughtful essay, which I recommend. In my neck of the woods, some of the most influential literatures (Parfit & population ethics, animal ethics, longtermism, etc.) make strikingly revisionary claims, with many authors claiming precisely that "common sense morality" is inconsistent/wrong.
Reposted by Pablo Magaña
joshmilburn.bsky.social
Just published: my review of Ethical Omnivores: Better Eating for everyone, by Samantha Noll.

It's good we now have a sustained philosophical defence of this position. But I suggest that there are lots of places where Noll's arguments fall short.

link.springer.com/article/10.1...
pmagana94.bsky.social
In this first session, Stefan Schubert (co-author of the recent book “Effective Altruism and the Human Mind”, OUP 2025) will give a talk entitled “Caring for the Future, Caring for All.” You’re welcome to join us. Please find more info. in the link below:

philevents.org/event/show/1...
Caring for the Future, Caring for All
This online seminar series brings together researchers from philosophy, political science, psychology, and related disciplines to explore how humans think or should think about decisions concerning fu...
philevents.org
pmagana94.bsky.social
‼️How do we think about future generations? And how should we? On October 9 at 1pm CET we’re kicking off the first of a series of online seminars on “Moral Minds and Ethical Futures: Empirical and Normative Perspectives,” co-organized by
@hugoviciana.bsky.social (U. of Sevilla) and me.
pmagana94.bsky.social
Proof that backward causation is real!
pmagana94.bsky.social
Definitely! Thanks a lot! :)
pmagana94.bsky.social
Thanks, Rike! Congrats to you as well on your recent book chapter (which I will also read to become more familiar with the debates on compromise you mentioned). A week of good news 🙌
pmagana94.bsky.social
Thanks, Matt! I hope you find it interesting :)
pmagana94.bsky.social
Thanks for sharing, Josh! (Also on Twitter/X) 🙂
Reposted by Pablo Magaña
friderikespang.bsky.social
Coming out soon!
I've written a chapter for this book, where I compare compromise between persons to compromise within a person.
Looking forward to reading the other chapters!!
Many thanks to the editors for putting this together 🙏
@karstenmause.bsky.social

#academicsky
Book cover and details for History and Theory of Compromise, open access, to be published 2026
pmagana94.bsky.social
More generally, and whether or not realism is tenable, I think the error-theoretic account these authors suggest is interesting, and nicely illuminates aspects of speciesism. So I am also happy using it a bit more opportunistically (without the realist attachment haha).
pmagana94.bsky.social
Thanks for reading it! Yes, I think it's fair to say realist ideology critique is a type of error theory, combined with a strong skepticism about moral normativity. I am more optimistic, but my metaethical views are not super stable, so I am happy hedging my bets 😄
pmagana94.bsky.social
Thanks for sharing, Steve! I am still a "moralist" to be honest, but I now think there's a version of realism I can really understand (and that, crucially, seems compatible with anti-speciesism!).
pmagana94.bsky.social
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/... Political realists believe that we shouldn’t criticize political phenomena on moral grounds. If they are right, are animal ethicists in trouble? Can we still criticize speciesist social orders? In this new paper, I argue that we can.
Ideology, Red in Tooth and Claw: Realist Ideology Critique and Animals
Click on the article title to read more.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Reposted by Pablo Magaña
emollick.bsky.social
Some new theoretical economics papers modelling the implications of AGI on the economy.

These two papers argue that a true AGI-level AI (equivalent to a human genius), if achieved, would eventually displace most human labor and reduce the economic value of remaining human work to near-zero.
Reposted by Pablo Magaña