Nina Henry
@ninagrace.bsky.social
100 followers 320 following 27 posts
Counsel + comms @myconstitution.bsky.social. Opinions are my own.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Nina Henry
Also today the Court is considering whether police may enter homes w/o warrants based on less than probable cause that an emergency is occurring. Read our brief explaining why allowing such entries would be at odds w/ the 4A’s text & history: www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/c...
Case v. Montana | Constitutional Accountability Center
www.theusconstitution.org
Reposted by Nina Henry
Today, #SCOTUS is hearing Louisiana v. Callais, a case with enormous implications for the Voting Rights Act. Read our brief explaining that the Constitution gives Congress broad enforcement power to prevent impairment of the right to vote. www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/l...
Louisiana v. Callais | Constitutional Accountability Center
www.theusconstitution.org
Reposted by Nina Henry
Reposted by Nina Henry
Next Wednesday, #SCOTUS is hearing a case with enormous implications for voting rights. More than 150 years after Black people fought to make America a multiracial democracy, does the Court still respect this fundamental aspect of our constitutional order? slate.com/news-and-pol...
The Supreme Court Is Being Tested on History Once Again
The leading arguments in support of Black voting rights were race-conscious at their core.
slate.com
Reposted by Nina Henry
Next week, #SCOTUS is hearing argument in three important cases in which CAC filed amicus briefs.
Reposted by Nina Henry
If the Trump administration wants to end lawlessness in the District of Columbia, it should start with its own actions. Read our amicus brief explaining why deploying armed soldiers to police DC was unlawful: www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/d...
District of Columbia v. Trump | Constitutional Accountability Center
www.theusconstitution.org
Reposted by Nina Henry
"The colonists sought not just territory, but unchallenged dominion. To achieve this, they needed to erase the legitimacy of Native governance and justify dispossession. It was precisely because Natives mirrored the colonists’ own ideals (autonomy, law, liberty) that they had to be cast as savages."
Reposted by Nina Henry
Today is your daily reminder that queer kids are absolutely perfect just the way they are. Pass it on.
Reposted by Nina Henry
Trump can’t unilaterally withhold federal funding from sanctuary jurisdictions. Read our brief explaining why courts should be able to review plaintiffs’ constitutional challenge to the administration’s actions: www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/s...
San Francisco v. Trump | Constitutional Accountability Center
www.theusconstitution.org
Reposted by Nina Henry
"When the Roberts court examines the Constitution’s text and history, it has privileged white male voices. But if it wants to be faithful to constitutional text and history in Callais, it will have to broaden the lens." Read CAC's @davidhgans.bsky.social in @slate.com: slate.com/news-and-pol...
The Supreme Court Is Being Tested on History Once Again
The leading arguments in support of Black voting rights were race-conscious at their core.
slate.com
Reposted by Nina Henry
You can't understand the Reconstruction Amendments without grappling with the work of the Black conventions that eloquently spoke to the constitutional aspirations of Black Americans. Read my latest piece @slate.com on how Black Americans won the right to vote: slate.com/news-and-pol...
The Supreme Court Is Being Tested on History Once Again
The leading arguments in support of Black voting rights were race-conscious at their core.
slate.com
Super interesting and relevant scholarship from my brilliant colleague David on how Black voting rights advocates shaped our Constitution during Reconstruction:
"When the Roberts court examines the Constitution’s text and history, it has privileged white male voices. But if it wants to be faithful to constitutional text and history in Callais, it will have to broaden the lens." Read CAC's @davidhgans.bsky.social in @slate.com: slate.com/news-and-pol...
The Supreme Court Is Being Tested on History Once Again
The leading arguments in support of Black voting rights were race-conscious at their core.
slate.com
Reposted by Nina Henry
Today, #SCOTUS is considering whether Colorado can prohibit licensed mental health professionals from practicing harmful “conversion therapy” on young people. Read our brief explaining that states can protect their residents from such dangerous practices: www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/c...
Chiles v. Salazar | Constitutional Accountability Center
www.theusconstitution.org
Reposted by Nina Henry
Reposted by Nina Henry
Tomorrow, #SCOTUS is considering if Colorado can prohibit licensed mental health professionals from practicing harmful “conversion therapy” on young people. Read our brief explaining that states can protect their residents from such dangerous practices: www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/c...
Chiles v. Salazar | Constitutional Accountability Center
www.theusconstitution.org
Reposted by Nina Henry
The First Circuit is right—some constitutional questions may be difficult, but the scope of the constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship is not. www.cbsnews.com/news/federal...
"The analysis that follows is necessarily lengthy, as we
must address the parties' numerous arguments in each of the cases
involved. But the length of our analysis should not be mistaken
for a sign that the fundamental question that these cases raise
about the scope of birthright citizenship is a difficult one. It
is not, which may explain why it has been more than a century since
a branch of our government has made as concerted an effort as the
Executive Branch now makes to deny Americans their birthright."
Reposted by Nina Henry
Next Monday, a new term at #SCOTUS begins. CAC has filed in five important cases before the Court in October: 🧵
Reposted by Nina Henry
BREAKING -- 1st Cir. says Trump's attempt to end birthright citizenship REMAINS BLOCKED.

Opinion includes a helpful TL;DR:

Don't mistake the length of our answer for the existence of a real question. Birthright citizenship is broad-based and it's sacred. @brennancenter.org
One of these amazing ladies turns up in the "where are they now" montage STILL ALIVE AT 105, but I will not tell you which one! You have to read the book!