How do you justify the continued misappropriation of the phrase “anonymous donors” to describe Trump’s secret beneficiaries? You can’t claim to be too dumb to see that you’ve re-defined the term. This shameful, abetting era of the Grey Lady continues. Mike Johnson lied again today. Might wanna chirp
They aren’t. This is a transaction channel so ppl who can’t be donors can purchase pardons, exemptions, contracts. They generally come through on bribes to encourage more of them.
As a lifetime reader it is so upsetting to have been completely abandoned by the NYT as an institution in our hour of need. Their cowardice is a daily shock and disappointment. Anyway, go read a real newspaper. It's essential that Americans be informed. www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
You’re applying the wrong standard. Jokes never need such corrections bc their test is colloquial use. If it’s not there, then nobody gets the joke
Use of the phrase “the nineteen hundreds” to refer to the entire century is so common the wiki has to clarify in the second sentence, so the joke lands
Orwell noted ppl often choose transcendence & self sacrifice over safety & comfort. Add this and you might have the whole enchilada.
Admitting that you’re suffering is a humiliation. Our wish to be part of something larger than ourselves is unrelenting. Auth regimes offer a tidy solution for both.
Incredible work here defending the line between “nearly zero” and zero, and I’m thrilled that you now agree that both assertions are absurd. It really is about the journey!
I asked you to say a percentage and you ducked the question. Because you know that while that demo is no doubt responsible for lots of harm, it is objectively absurd to say that we would have “virtually zero” such crime if we removed it. You know that is true. Stop squirming around and admit it.
Okay this is getting so absurd. Say the percentage of crimes against women and children that you think male MAGA voters are responsible for out loud please.
