15/15 Diving deeper into each tool in Wednesday's newsletter.

Follow: @naturityai.bsky.social

Subscribe: naturityai.substack.com

RT if this helped - more researchers should know about these #AI #Science #Tools🧬

14/15 Want to explore this stuff together?

Join us: naturity.ai
Share your finds: #NaturityAI

Science gets better when we compare notes.

13/15 Just starting with AI research tools?

Pick ONE that solves your biggest headache. Get good with it. Then expand.

The goal isn't to use AI everywhere. It's to make your research better.

12/15 The real shift isn't about individual tools.

It's about extending what's possible. Not replacing thinking, but amplifying it.

AI is becoming the lab equipment of thought work. 🧪

11/15 Pro tip: These tools shine brightest together.

Math problem? O1 + Claude for implementation
Literature deep dive? Elicit + Consensus
Writing day? SciSpace + HyperWrite

Mix and match for your needs.

10/15 scite_ai earned its spot in my workflow through quality.

Solid Zotero integration. Reliable paper recommendations. Bibliography building that doesn't make you double-check everything.

Sometimes boring is beautiful. 📚

9/15 Everyone knows SemanticScholar, but don't sleep on its improvements and power.

Searches that get what you mean, not just what you type. The tool has been getting bigger and better since its inception, and it's one of the best Google Scholar alternatives on the market.

8/15 consensus.app hits different.

Ask a research question. Get relevant papers instantly. But the magic is in how it helps you understand connections between sources.

Making sense of science at the speed of curiosity. 🔍

7/15 scispace_ quietly handles everything in your writing pipeline from lit review to final citations.

Writing support? Check. Paraphrasing? Yep. Plagiarism checking? Got it.

Sometimes the best tools are the ones that just... work. SciSpace does it all.

6/15 Let's talk about HyperWrite - the unsung hero of fact-checking.

Need peer-reviewed info? Help understanding complex theories? It pulls from the literature and gives you answers you can actually trust.

In the age of hallucination, that's gold.💎

5/15 @anthropic.com's Claude 3.5 Sonnet gets a lot of hype, but here's why it matters:

Projects feature + Google Docs integration. Complex programming help. Actually useful brainstorming.

With good prompt design, Claude can produce publication-ready code and writing in seconds.

4/15 Google's NotebookLM surprised me.

Think 'chat with your research papers' but actually useful. Convert dense papers into podcast summaries for your commute. Load up field-specific docs and interact with them naturally.

My commute just became productive. 🎧

3/15 ChatGPT-o1 is a game-changer for logical reasoning.

Finally - an AI that handles complex proofs with real rigor at the edge of human ability. The logical problem-solving capabilities here are next level.

Stats folks, this one's worth your attention. #AI #Science 📊

2/15 Ever heard of @elicitorg.bsky.social?

Not just another literature search tool. When you're working with 50+ papers, it helps you spot patterns and build connections in ways that transform how you understand your field.

Science moves fast. This helps you keep up.

1/15 After testing dozens of AI research tools for my literature reviews, data analysis, and programming, I've completely changed how I approach scientific work.

And it's not the tools you might expect.

A thread on what's actually working in 2024: 🧬