Nathalie Jung
banner
nathaliejung.bsky.social
Nathalie Jung
@nathaliejung.bsky.social
18 followers 48 following 4 posts
Fuelling up on good coffee, then heading into the next adventure - be it in the lab or the mountains ⛰️ Senior Researcher at the Adolphe Merkle Institute's BioNanomaterials Group | University of Fribourg, Switzerland
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
As a photography and nature enthusiast, every image in 'The Anthropocene Illusion' by @zednelson.bsky.social makes me feel something: a haunting look at how we replicate nature in curated spaces while destroying the real thing. Unsettling, yet undeniably aesthetic www.newyorker.com/culture/phot...
The Futility of Simulating Nature
In “The Anthropocene Illusion,” the photographer Zed Nelson captures how the natural world has been reproduced, reshuffled, and repackaged, sold to visitors in the form of spectacle.
www.newyorker.com
Last week was my first @pintofscience.ch and I loved it!
From giving a talk on Monday in Bern to volunteering in Fribourg the other days, I was constantly impressed by the curiosity of the audience and especially the dedication of the organising teams. Truly well done 👏 #PINT25 #Scicomm
At yesterday's @pintofscience.ch event we could have stayed all night discussing environmental ethics under the disco ball with Ivo Wallimann-Helmer from @unifr.bsky.social. A fascinating reminder of how complex and important questions of environmental justice and local actions really are #PINT25
Reposted by Nathalie Jung
🐭🔬 Aus die Maus? Geht Forschung ohne Tierversuch?

🗓️ 19 May 2025 | 18:30 doors open and 19:00 start of the talks
📍Kramer Keller - Bern, Kramgasse 12

👉 pintofscience.ch/event/aus-di...

@nathaliejung.bsky.social @toscadalessi.bsky.social
#pintCH #Pint25
Maybe it's time to admit that goodwill and moral obligation aren't a sustainable foundation for peer review—the very system that shapes careers and defines scientific credibility. It's encouraging to see alternative models finally being explored. @biologyopen.bsky.social @peerj.bsky.social
nature.com Nature @nature.com · Mar 28
A spate of research findings offer fresh evidence to the debate about whether peer reviewers should be paid for their time and expertise — a fraught topic that has provoked discussion among researchers

https://go.nature.com/3QVhFc6
Publishers trial paying peer reviewers — what did they find?
Two journals embarked on efforts to compensate reviewers, with different results.
go.nature.com