Christoph Bergs
banner
milavhis.bsky.social
Christoph Bergs
@milavhis.bsky.social
600 followers 53 following 110 posts
Life consists of Air Power and Aircraft. Founder: Military Aviation History.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Christoph Bergs
Here's the German part of the discussion on four-engine bombers. I smile, nod, ask an occasional question, and then absolutely rock the outro while @milavhis.bsky.social lays the info down.
youtu.be/dpNsIDn6KhE?...
Why Luftwaffe Strategic Bombers Never Happened
YouTube video by Military Aviation History
youtu.be
Reposted by Christoph Bergs
Here's part 1 of a chat that Chris and I originally envisioned as a quick'n'easy one. Then we talked for an hour each. For my part, I used this common internet question as a Trojan horse of sorts to explore elements that aren't discussed as often as dry technical details of the aircraft themselves.
Mistake or Calculated Risk? Why Japan Did Not Build Strategic Bombers during World War 2 - Join a fascinating chat w/ @justinpykehistory.bsky.social on why Japan went hot & cold on long-range strategic bombers.
youtu.be/nstaj1mHFHU
Mistake or Calculated Risk? Why Japan Did Not Build Strategic Bombers
YouTube video by Military Aviation History
youtu.be
Thanks Eugen. All the praise goes to Justin on this one of course.
Mistake or Calculated Risk? Why Japan Did Not Build Strategic Bombers during World War 2 - Join a fascinating chat w/ @justinpykehistory.bsky.social on why Japan went hot & cold on long-range strategic bombers.
youtu.be/nstaj1mHFHU
Mistake or Calculated Risk? Why Japan Did Not Build Strategic Bombers
YouTube video by Military Aviation History
youtu.be
Reposted by Christoph Bergs
I really enjoyed this video @milavhis.bsky.social just put out on the complex discussion of air support during the Second World War. He focuses on the Luftwaffe, but some of what he covers gave me food for thought in my area of study too.
youtu.be/7fxfp_xGfUg?...
The Complicated Luftwaffe Air Support Problem
YouTube video by Military Aviation History
youtu.be
I really enjoyed this video @milavhis.bsky.social just put out on the complex discussion of air support during the Second World War. He focuses on the Luftwaffe, but some of what he covers gave me food for thought in my area of study too.
youtu.be/7fxfp_xGfUg?...
The Complicated Luftwaffe Air Support Problem
YouTube video by Military Aviation History
youtu.be
Reposted by Christoph Bergs
How can military aircraft be used to gain influence in other nation-states?

Piers Register spoke to @milavhis.bsky.social to examine a shift in the military aircraft export market & whether attitudes around aircraft supply & development need to change.

Watch 👇
www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDVg...
Great to speak to NatGeo and bring my history airpower ramblings to the mainstream. Release 2026 alongside an excellent cast of experts.
In terms of mishaps, the numbers say otherwise. See this for more: www.rusi.org/explore-our-...
If Spain is serious about investing 85% of defence spending (2%) into Europe, this will have left ~5bn for an F-35 deal and not much else. It leaves Spain without a fixed-wing carrier post Harrier retirement however and maybe a gap to other European partners until FCAS (if and when).
Reposted by Christoph Bergs
My chat with Jon and Seth over at the Unauthorized History of the Pacific War Podcast is now live! It was a lot of fun. I know a couple of the tangents ended up being a bit ramble-y. You'll have to forgive me there.
youtu.be/ZLKHzhthUEE?...
The Air War Over China 1937-40 with Justin Pyke - Episode 514
YouTube video by Unauthorized History of the Pacific War Podcast
youtu.be
Reposted by Christoph Bergs
Just published via RUSI... I suspect this one may generate some strong opinions but I think it's an important set of factors for military planners especially in the Land domain to engage with:

NATO Should Not Replace Traditional Firepower with ‘Drones’

www.rusi.org/explore-our-...
NATO Should Not Replace Traditional Firepower with ‘Drones’
Over-reliance on uncrewed aerial systems or ‘drones’ is leading to significant problems for the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and is not something Western militaries should attempt to replicate
www.rusi.org
buy more minis instead :)
I understand Allan’s OG point btw. But there is a general phenomenon w/ air superiority portrayed as a binary have/have not with no consideration of operating concepts, temporal and spatial limits and shaping efforts to deliver air effects in contested air environments. Character limits don’t help.
Doing this consistently on a rolling basis was “secret sauce” of the Luftwaffe (arguably only 1-2 Fliegerkorps in 1939-1940). This contrasts sharply (initially) with other Air Forces. Broadly similar platforms (eg Fairey Battle) would likely had more success if a similar approach was taken. 2/2
This 🧵👇 by @crusaderproject.bsky.social
- The Ju 87 (as any plane of its approximate type) required a permissive air environment which can be limited in time and space. Screening fighters to punch a hole and maintain the window long enough for bomb drop, then covering retreat. That was the… 1/2
@alanallport.bsky.social has disabled quote posts so this will have to do, but this is the only hard disagree in his long and very informative list of options I have. 1/🧵

@balloons2drones.bsky.social @navalairhistory.com @rafhistory.bsky.social @airminded.org
where is the ISD?
WHERE is the ISD?
WHERE IS THE ISD?
😡
Yup. IL-2 is one of the most shot down planes of WW2. Frontal and lower armour helped vs small arms fire and some 20mm caliber type AA HE hits (esp. at steep angles). It’s impossible to offer all-round protection however.
Worthwhile to consider that during WW2, it is likely that most fighter pilots never saw the plane that “got them”. Beyond ground attackers and bombers, armour was an expensive feature that was balanced to offer the realistically achievable protection to pilot and vital systems, and nothing more.
This video from @milavhis.bsky.social does a great job introducing aircraft protection in more detail than I can get into here. As Chris says, armour was a "saving throw." It was a last ditch tool. Something else had gone badly wrong if you were relying on your armour.
youtu.be/TZ9Ip1TyWJ4?...
Aircraft Armor and Fuel Tank Protection 1914-1941
YouTube video by Military Aviation History
youtu.be
Reposted by Christoph Bergs
Given the imminent release of a chat I had with Seth and Jon for the Unauthorized History of the Pacific War Podcast, where one of the tangents was me rambling semi-coherently about aircraft protection, I've decided to update a thread I did on it related to Japanese aircraft from many years ago.
After recently posting my @rusi.bsky.social commentary on how high profile mishaps with F-35 could play a role in shaping public perception, it’s fascinating to see how the point I made is reflected in the comments…