Mike Henderson
banner
mhender.bsky.social
Mike Henderson
@mhender.bsky.social
140 followers 200 following 520 posts
Retired Applied Mathematician. Computational Dynamical Systems. Still trying to understand how things work. https://multifario.sourceforge.io/henderson/ I might be wrong.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
This is the same algorithm (and code) as for the torus. The continuation is limited to the inside of a box, so you only see the yellow spheres until they cross that. The polyhedra around the spheres are more visible. They're used to find the boundary of the union of spherical balls.
This is an animation of an algorithm for covering a torus with the projection of disks tangent to the surface. Red is the boundary, and the yellow contribute to the boundary. Blue ones are interior.

Each step picks a point on the boundary for a new disk. The boundary is a simple list.
I have always had a blind spot for people who say things with confidence. I need to think about things, and can't seem to avoid reacting as if confidence means that they've thought about what they're saying. I know I'm not alone in this.

So not surprised that LLMs come across as intelligent.
Ugh. I moved my stuff to a new machine, and when I ran configure on my code I goofed and told it to use lapack64 instead of lapack. Strange messages about subroutine arguments having bad values.

I hate debugging. I hate installing and configuring code.
Or in my case, I worked on computing manifolds. I can do it for any dimension (it can be expensive). Now all I hear is -- "Well, we can't draw anything higher than k=2, so what's it good for?"

Thanks,
On the question about what counts as a solution, I've seen people spend a lot of time and doing some brilliant things to get a closed form solution. It's nevertheless 10 lines long and the response is usually -- "Oh, good".
Its like "what's your favorite song?". Well it was Bowie, "Young Americans" until Cohen's "Alexandra Leaving" played on iTunes. Now it's that. What do you mean?

I'm great at small talk. The IBM execs loved me too. An answer, any answer, as long as it's confidently stated.
Something we used to talk about all the time is what counts as "solving" a differential equation? Does it require a (simple) closed form? An asymptotic expansion? A numerical solution?

And I've yet to discover what "solving" the 3-body problem means. Stop that.

I do have my opinions.
There's not even a best case where there is any positive benefit.
The coach gets paid several million a year. For what?
So you spend all these millions and they do shit (watching PSU game). But even if they win, what exactly is the benefit????
I'm just trying to imagine if the amount of attention (and money) that goes into college football went instead into Applied Math (just a random alternative).
I should say these differential forms are vectors. All are tensors.
Ok. I have a blind spot for the whole "differential forms" thing. They're vectors. Rate of work is F.v, so applied force over a displacement in a direction. Heat is a flow. Sheesh.

BTW, (1/2 m v.v)'=ma.v=F.v
I 'm reading Hermann's "Geometry, Physics, and Systems", 1973. It's got a chapter on Thermo. I love this guy.

He doesn't like the (dU/dP)_V notation or mysticism (his word) about entropy.

But what's with the bibliography? All references are labelled 1? Later there are some 2's.
Click the wrong box so that my retirement is invested in the wrong place, decide to withdraw too much every month, ... x/x
I guess it's good to know that if I don't press the wrong button I'm safe. But I'm concerned. Is there someone enforcing this? Can I get it in writing? Same for real life? What if I sign the wrong document, say the wrong thing, am in the wrong place, or born to the wrong parents? 2/x
Since grad school I never let myself play computer games. Novels were bad enough. But now I play solitaire. It's as much about dodging the ads. One claims I'm out of date (maybe true). If I press the wrong button I have to uninstall all sorts of games and find how to get the screen manager back 1/x
A question: this thermo stuff uses the notation
(\frac{\partial T}{\partial V})_S
Why the subscr\frac{\partial T}{\partial V}ipt? Isn't that what the partial means? If S was a function of V it'd be
\partial T/\partial V+ \partial T/\partial S \partial S/\partial V
No?
And then I read chemical perspectives that say things like each phase has a Gibbs free energy and the state with the lowest G is the stable one. Is this empirical? G=H-TS, so why?
In other applications I'd expect the existence of an energy (U,F,G,H) to define a surface on which the system can move. Fix the energies and there's a range of accessible states. Since there's no dynamics maybe fixed energies defines a single state?