Matt Fillingim
mfilling.bsky.social
Matt Fillingim
@mfilling.bsky.social
Pinned
Thrilled to share our new paper in Nature Human Behaviour!

nature.com/articles/s41...

We show that combining biological 🧬 and psychosocial 📋 data offers a much stronger, more reliable path to predicting pain and diagnosis. 🧵
Biological markers and psychosocial factors predict chronic pain conditions - Nature Human Behaviour
Fillingim et al. show that biological and psychosocial factors jointly predict conditions associated with chronic pain.
nature.com
Reposted by Matt Fillingim
Reposted by Matt Fillingim
🔥 Most important paper I've read all year🔥
👉 Injury/disease doesn't reliably predict pain
👉 Biomarkers alone can't explain pain
👉 PSYCHOSOCIAL factors reliably determine chronic pain
👉 Painful conditions can be predicted from the SYNERGY btwn bio + psychosocial factors
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Biological markers and psychosocial factors predict chronic pain conditions - Nature Human Behaviour
Fillingim et al. show that biological and psychosocial factors jointly predict conditions associated with chronic pain.
www.nature.com
May 14, 2025 at 3:18 AM
Huge thanks to our incredible team and collaborators.

Read the full paper here: nature.com/articles/s41...

Grateful to Nature Human Behaviour for publishing this work.

#ChronicPain #PrecisionMedicine #Biomarkers #Psychosocial #MachineLearning
Biological markers and psychosocial factors predict chronic pain conditions - Nature Human Behaviour
Fillingim et al. show that biological and psychosocial factors jointly predict conditions associated with chronic pain.
nature.com
May 12, 2025 at 4:18 PM
Adding psychosocial context dramatically improved prediction accuracy across all pain phenotypes.
🧬 + 📋 = 🔍

This synergy paints a richer picture of pain vulnerability and brings us closer to personalized pain care.
May 12, 2025 at 4:18 PM
We created biomarker and psychosocial risk scores and grouped participants into quintiles.

Those high on both risks had over 2× higher incidence of painful conditions over 15 years, while those high on just one showed little to no added risk.
May 12, 2025 at 4:18 PM
Biomarkers alone accurately predicted many painful medical conditions, often outperforming psychosocial models.

But for self-reported pain, biology wasn’t enough, psychosocial models performed significantly better.
May 12, 2025 at 4:18 PM
We then compared the biological models to psychosocial models spanning mental health, physical well-being, and sociodemographic factors.
May 12, 2025 at 4:18 PM
We applied machine learning to four biological data types:🩸blood assays, 🦴bone scans, 🧠brain imaging, and 🧬genetics, to develop biomarkers for conditions like arthritis or migraine, as well as self-reported bodily pain.
May 12, 2025 at 4:18 PM
We asked: Can combining biological and psychosocial information improve prediction of chronic pain conditions?

Spoiler: Yes, significantly.
May 12, 2025 at 4:18 PM
Thrilled to share our new paper in Nature Human Behaviour!

nature.com/articles/s41...

We show that combining biological 🧬 and psychosocial 📋 data offers a much stronger, more reliable path to predicting pain and diagnosis. 🧵
Biological markers and psychosocial factors predict chronic pain conditions - Nature Human Behaviour
Fillingim et al. show that biological and psychosocial factors jointly predict conditions associated with chronic pain.
nature.com
May 12, 2025 at 4:18 PM
Reposted by Matt Fillingim
Our new @NatureHumBehav paper shows why we need a holistic pain biomarker framework. ML on blood tests, brain/bone imaging & genetics predicts clinical diagnoses but falls short on subjective pain. Adding psychosocial (mood, sleep, stress) boosts both. shorturl.at/vxxeO
Biological markers and psychosocial factors predict chronic pain conditions - Nature Human Behaviour
Fillingim et al. show that biological and psychosocial factors jointly predict conditions associated with chronic pain.
shorturl.at
May 12, 2025 at 3:51 PM