Max
@maxchch.bsky.social
1.2K followers 1.3K following 2.8K posts
God gets the credit man gets the blame Trump's Big Beautiful Bill will increase the National Debt by 3.5Trillion. That's 1M each day for the next 9000 years He didn't win the WH he was installed Respect Buddhism NZ- where Peter Thiel has bought a passport
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
maxchch.bsky.social
Here's what retired Generals think about Corporal Bone Spurs, who had active US soldiers on their hands and knees rolling out red carpet for a war criminal.

MAGATs: if you want to buy a kidnapped Ukrainian child from Crimea, they're being sold on the internet.
You must be so proud of yourselves
maxchch.bsky.social
The 911 call centers should be flooded with calls the moment masked men get out of unmarked cars
maxchch.bsky.social
The Qatari pilots need a base in Idaho to train.
I wonder why they couldn't train in the largest US military base in the Middle East - which is in Qatar
maxchch.bsky.social
There should be a call to 911 every time this sort of thing happens.
Even when masked men get out of unmarked cars - call 911
maxchch.bsky.social
Having trouble processing facts are you?
You're lucky you don't know how to fact-check because if you did you would be amazed at what Fox has kept from you.
.
Go shoot an elephant plonker - it looks like fun.
I wonder if Trump jr. got his rocks off watching it die
maxchch.bsky.social
Global warming isn't an issue if you are rich enough to insulate yourself from its effects
maxchch.bsky.social
He may not understand it but he sure as hell knows how to use it
maxchch.bsky.social
What's legality got to do with it?
maxchch.bsky.social
He hates the picture because it looks like he wasn't shot in his ear
Reposted by Max
maxchch.bsky.social
* * * * WOW * * * *
Look what I have found - thanks to your question,
"Yes, a U.S. federal district or circuit court judge can administer the oath of office to a newly elected member of Congress though the situation is unusual and context-dependent".
.
x.com/i/grok/share...
Can a US federal district or circuit court judge swear in a newly elected member-to-be of Congress, if that person has been certified by their state as the winner of a special election in their congressional district, and yet the speaker of the house will not perform that obligation?
Yes, a U.S. federal district or circuit court judge can administer the oath of office to a newly elected member of Congress in such a scenario, though the situation is unusual and context-dependent. The U.S. Constitution (Article VI, Clause 3) requires members of Congress to take an oath to support the Constitution, but it does not specify who must administer it. In practice, the Speaker of the House typically administers the oath to new members during a formal swearing-in ceremony after a special election, as outlined in House Rules and 2 U.S.C. § 25. However, if the Speaker refuses or is unable to perform this duty, there is no constitutional or statutory prohibition against another official, such as a federal judge, administering the oath. The key requirement is that the member-elect has been certified by their state as the winner of the special election, as state certification establishes their legal status as the elected representative (2 U.S.C. § 8). Federal judges, as officers authorized to administer oaths under 5 U.S.C. § 2903, can legally perform this function. Historical precedent supports this flexibility: for example, in rare cases, members-elect have been sworn in by local officials or notaries when circumstances prevented the Speaker from doing so, such as during recesses or emergencies. However, the House retains ultimate authority to determine the qualifications of its members (Article I, Section 5, Clause 1). If the Speaker’s refusal reflects a broader dispute within the House (e.g., over the election’s validity or the member’s qualifications), the House could challenge the member’s seating, regardless of who administers the oath. In such cases, the member might be seated provisionally until the House resolves the matter, as seen in historical disputes like the 1969 case of Powell v. McCormack. In summary, a federal judge can swear in the member-elect if the state has certified their election, but the Speaker’s refusal could signal procedural or political complications that the House would need to resolve. If you need further analysis of specific legal precedents or practical implications, let me know!
x.com
maxchch.bsky.social
* * * * WOW * * * *
Look what I have found - thanks to your question,
"Yes, a U.S. federal district or circuit court judge can administer the oath of office to a newly elected member of Congress though the situation is unusual and context-dependent".
.
x.com/i/grok/share...
Can a US federal district or circuit court judge swear in a newly elected member-to-be of Congress, if that person has been certified by their state as the winner of a special election in their congressional district, and yet the speaker of the house will not perform that obligation?
Yes, a U.S. federal district or circuit court judge can administer the oath of office to a newly elected member of Congress in such a scenario, though the situation is unusual and context-dependent. The U.S. Constitution (Article VI, Clause 3) requires members of Congress to take an oath to support the Constitution, but it does not specify who must administer it. In practice, the Speaker of the House typically administers the oath to new members during a formal swearing-in ceremony after a special election, as outlined in House Rules and 2 U.S.C. § 25. However, if the Speaker refuses or is unable to perform this duty, there is no constitutional or statutory prohibition against another official, such as a federal judge, administering the oath. The key requirement is that the member-elect has been certified by their state as the winner of the special election, as state certification establishes their legal status as the elected representative (2 U.S.C. § 8). Federal judges, as officers authorized to administer oaths under 5 U.S.C. § 2903, can legally perform this function. Historical precedent supports this flexibility: for example, in rare cases, members-elect have been sworn in by local officials or notaries when circumstances prevented the Speaker from doing so, such as during recesses or emergencies. However, the House retains ultimate authority to determine the qualifications of its members (Article I, Section 5, Clause 1). If the Speaker’s refusal reflects a broader dispute within the House (e.g., over the election’s validity or the member’s qualifications), the House could challenge the member’s seating, regardless of who administers the oath. In such cases, the member might be seated provisionally until the House resolves the matter, as seen in historical disputes like the 1969 case of Powell v. McCormack. In summary, a federal judge can swear in the member-elect if the state has certified their election, but the Speaker’s refusal could signal procedural or political complications that the House would need to resolve. If you need further analysis of specific legal precedents or practical implications, let me know!
x.com
maxchch.bsky.social
Yep - the price you have to pay to protect a pedophile
maxchch.bsky.social
To be fair - it's not a bad reason
maxchch.bsky.social
Yes, but his god loves him so he doesn't care
maxchch.bsky.social
He shouldn't be scared because he has his god to lead him, and I'm sure his god will side with Trump.
maxchch.bsky.social
I hope she has good security - and her home
maxchch.bsky.social
Clarence and I agree, the case would be tolled

John Roberts
Chief Justice
SCOTUS
maxchch.bsky.social
It 's absolutely amazing that brainwashed MAGAts like you think there's peace in the Middle East
All Trump got is a pause in the killing and 20 Israeli prisoners swapped for 2000 Palestinian prisoners
Israel soldiers are still in Gaza, and Hamas is in the streets shooting and executing people, MAGAt
maxchch.bsky.social
If Trump is consistent he should get the Medal of Freedom
maxchch.bsky.social
If only it was just the government. It's also Trump sycophants throughout state governments, corrupt judges, corrupt SCOTUS justices, and nefarious billionaires behind the scenes like Peter Thiel who can buy a government (in his case he paid for and groomed Vance)
maxchch.bsky.social
Who is the military commander who is carrying out illegal orders?
maxchch.bsky.social
And you live in the most corrupt country on the planet
maxchch.bsky.social
I don't think so. Trump gets standing ovations - he needs them to breath. They know that so they do what they have to do to trade with the US.
Imagine not standing when other countries are. Trump would add them to his vengeance list. He loves watching others suffer
bsky.app/profile/maxc...
maxchch.bsky.social
Trump's reason for the "facility" in Idaho is to train Qatari pilots on F35's. I wonder why they weren't able to train in the biggest US air-force bases in the Middle East - which is in Qatar.

Here's the real reason - it's payback time