Matt
@matt600000.bsky.social
270 followers 460 following 3K posts
Enjoy cooking, baking, and gardening. Big sports fan - football, cricket, rugby league. History graduate. Music lover.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
matt600000.bsky.social
A year of songs:
I said this morning that one thing I want to do this year is to post more music content on here. So (foolishly) I've set myself a challenge of posting a song each day. To make it harder I'm imposing 2 rules: I can only use each artist once, and the song titles should cycle A-Z.
matt600000.bsky.social
You look pretty amazing from what I've seen
matt600000.bsky.social
A claim you've still provided no evidence of. Idiot. Goodbye. Blocked.
matt600000.bsky.social
It's called playing devil's advocate 🤦‍♂️
matt600000.bsky.social
Wild West rice. Wild rice with onions, squash, dried cranberries, lemon and dill.
Recipe by Jamie Oliver.
#food #foodsky #homecooking #lunch #goodlunch
matt600000.bsky.social
Where have I said that?
matt600000.bsky.social
No I didn't. Your reading comprehension skills are poor. Try harder.
matt600000.bsky.social
Like in Soviet Russia? Lol
matt600000.bsky.social
To me they're both culpable. But clearly we're not going to agree on that.
matt600000.bsky.social
Is it? Always? What if that child is trapped in a cycle of poverty and worklessness when it grows up?
matt600000.bsky.social
Q1 - no I don't, which is why earlier on I said I think the two child cap should be scrapped
matt600000.bsky.social
I've said multiple times about parents "choosing" to have children. Women who are raped or abused are not making that choice.
matt600000.bsky.social
That some children are going hungry. But is the fact that those children are hungry entirely the fault of the government, or do the parents have some responsibility for that?
matt600000.bsky.social
It basically said nothing. Totally vacuous.
matt600000.bsky.social
So everyone should do whatever they like and not care about the consequences, and just expect everyone else to deal with the consequences? Because that's what happens when there's no personal responsibility.
matt600000.bsky.social
So you think people should become parents on a whim without thinking through the consequences, whether they can afford to look after the child, etc?
matt600000.bsky.social
No I'm not. I quite clearly stated earlier in the thread that the two child cap should be scrapped.
matt600000.bsky.social
Where have I said that? I quite clearly stated earlier in the thread that thd two child cap should be scrapped.
matt600000.bsky.social
That really doesn't answer the question that I put. Try again.
matt600000.bsky.social
No, I don't. Your reading comprehension is shocking. Blocked.
matt600000.bsky.social
Read the full thread. I'm talking about families who choose to have kids when they know - at the time- they won't be able to afford to feed them. There should be a safety net for those who fall into financial difficulties, but having kids you can't afford is deeply irresponsible.
matt600000.bsky.social
For context, since you've obviously not read all the conversation, I am not talking about those who are raped of abused (or those who fall into financial hardship after the child is born), but those who choose to have a child despite knowing they won't be able to afford to feed it.
matt600000.bsky.social
Do you believe you should choose to bring a child into the world when you know you can't afford to feed them and look after them? Don't you think that's deeply irresponsible?
matt600000.bsky.social
Old? 🤣
No, I'm advocating for personal responsibility and not bringing children into the world when you know you can't afford yo feed them or clothe them. Because who wants to see children being neglected?
matt600000.bsky.social
You're advocating for children to be neglected and abused. Sicko.
matt600000.bsky.social
So do you think that a couple that already has kids and can't afford to feed them properly should have more kids?