Lisa P. Ramsey
@lpramsey.bsky.social
1.7K followers 390 following 230 posts
University of San Diego Law Professor. I teach IP law and write about potential conflicts between trademark laws and free speech rights. Pop culture and live music fan. www.lisapramsey.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
lpramsey.bsky.social
"Almost instantly, Sora’s early-access users were spinning up videos made with copyrighted material plucked from pop culture. (We saw more “Rick and Morty” and Pikachu videos than we would have liked.)"
www.nytimes.com/2025/10/02/t...
OpenAI’s New Video App Is Jaw-Dropping (for Better and Worse)
www.nytimes.com
lpramsey.bsky.social
The answer to your question is complicated, and that’s why I am curious what other trademark experts think about this issue assuming the subject matter is no longer protected by copyright law. Such TM applications might be refused on various grounds I discussed in my post (eg, false association).
lpramsey.bsky.social
Companies can claim trademark rights in words and symbols in the public domain that they use as a source-identifying mark for goods and services. If such marks are registered, the trademark registrant takes it out of the public domain with regard to the products listed in the registration.
lpramsey.bsky.social
. . . and may be using this image or the name in other ways it claims are a trademark use; and possibly on failure to function grounds depending on how the proposed mark is used by the trademark applicant in a certain context with the goods or services.
lpramsey.bsky.social
The USPTO could refuse such a mark on false association grounds in Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act; on likelihood of confusion grounds under Section 2(d) since Disney is using a short clip of Steamboat Willie in connection with its entertainment services . . .
lpramsey.bsky.social
Martin Senftleben has also written about this issue in his excellent book The Copyright/Trademark Interface and argues that governments should not register cultural heritage works.
lpramsey.bsky.social
I refer to it as "inherently valuable expression" in my upcoming book and argue that proposed marks consisting of creative works (or their titles or character names associated with them) should not be registered or, if they are registered, that the registrants should have a narrow scope of rights.
lpramsey.bsky.social
At INTA, I took the position that regardless of whether you think the artist who created an artistic work or the former copyright owner should be allowed to register such an image or phrase, random people should not be able to obtain exclusive trademark rights in this type of subject matter.
lpramsey.bsky.social
If they advertise it enough, or get publicity through filing a lawsuit like this, people might start to associate this subject matter with the trademark applicant (and not just Disney). We talked about this issue on my professors panel at the 2024 INTA annual meeting.
lpramsey.bsky.social
Trademark folks on BlueSky: Do you think the government should allow this law firm (or anyone else unrelated to Disney) to claim trademark rights in an image from, or short clip of, the public domain Steamboat Willie or the phrase "Steamboat Willie" for goods or services?
ttablog.bsky.social
Morgan & Morgan Claims Fair Use of Steamboat Willie Cartoon Adaptation in its Advertisement
thettablog.blogspot.com/2025/09/morg...
Reposted by Lisa P. Ramsey
ttablog.bsky.social
CAFC Vacates and Remands TTAB's Affirmance of F**K Failure-to-Function Refusal Due to Lack of Clarity
thettablog.blogspot.com/2025/08/cafc...
Reposted by Lisa P. Ramsey
design-law.bsky.social
Federal Circuit vacates and remands in Brunetti: www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-ord... (h/t @ttablog.bsky.social) #trademarks
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Erik Brunetti appeals a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”). The Board affirmed the examining attorney’s refusal to register the word FUCK as a trademark for certain goods and services because it failed to function as a trademark. In re Brunetti, No. 88308426, 2022 WL 3644733 (T.T.A.B. Aug. 22, 2022). We reject many of Mr. Brunetti’s arguments but nonetheless con-clude that the decision of the Board lacks sufficient clarity, and, accordingly, we vacate and remand for further pro-ceedings.
Reposted by Lisa P. Ramsey
poniewozik.bsky.social
"It is still a free country. You can still say what you want. So why are so many powerful institutions behaving like it isn’t and they can’t? If a few bratty cartoon kids can peel off the emperor’s clothes, what are the grown-ups so afraid of?" [giftie] www.nytimes.com/2025/08/16/a...
Eric Cartman, Welcome (for Now) to the Resistance
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by Lisa P. Ramsey
daphnek.bsky.social
Do you ever start reading something, and it's so disturbing that you just KEEP reading it and jotting down some notes and complaining to everyone you talk to and then... the next thing you know you have a whole article about it??

Here is my new article about the NO FAKES bill. 1/
The NO FAKES Bill: A Terrible Speech Law for Our Times
<span> <p><span>The 2025 NO FAKES bill would create a sweeping new regime of intellectual property ownership, licensing, and restrictions for a critical catego
papers.ssrn.com
Reposted by Lisa P. Ramsey
edleeprof.bsky.social
Updated Map of All US Copyright suits v AI companies. 45 cases still live. 3 voluntarily dismissed. Don’t expect any other cases to have decisions on fair use until spring 2026 at the earliest. Bartz trial on pirated books is Dec 1st in SF, 8 AM sharp.

chatgptiseatingtheworld.com/2025/08/13/u...
Updated Map of US copyright lawsuits v. AI companies (Aug. 12, 2025)
We updated the map to add the Strike 3 Holdings suit v. Meta. By our count, this brings the total to 48 copyright lawsuits in the U.S. against AI companies, of which 45 are still pending (after 3 w…
chatgptiseatingtheworld.com