Limot
LightNews LightNews
Limot
@limot.bsky.social
1.1K followers 430 following 4K posts
Mukesh Prasad writing as Limot. Graduate of 55 NDA, India. Graduate degrees from Yale University USA. I have taken 30 courses in Computer Science which is not a science despite the name and 20 in Physics which is a science despite no "science" in the name.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 8m
Sociologists some day will study the manmade climate scam and how it affected academia. There were research papers claiming humongous amounts of secret dark money the researcher diligently found. In broad light, while everybody knew there was no funding available to question manmade climate change.
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 5h
over and into Earth.

So the relationship with Venus is - the idiocy was made on calculations involving Venus first. No fault of Venus of course - here we have somebody who it's unclear knew the spelling of Thermodynamics, making physics out of whole cloth and rumor, ignorance, and sheer tenacity.
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 5h
that there was an 'e' involved. That's where he brought in the Greenhous Gas ideas from SciFi or folklore. There does happen to be CO2 on Venus, and there were numerous assumptions he could make in the absence of knowledge of CO2 frequencies and Thermodynamics in general. He carried that mistake
1
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 5h
Ok, so Venus is not relevant, because this is about the Earth and its CO2-involved-biosphere. Conditions on Venus do not affect the impossibility of GHG warming on Earth.

However, there is a tangential relation. Hansen ran his stuff on Venus first, and made the exact same mistake - he had no clue
1
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 8h
I mention "Ivy Leage". That was Harvard. The rude authors were from this lady's department. Some weird names iirc Weart and Pierrehumbert. Those are fronts, I doubt just some rando Harvard professors without footprint would have the guts to disrespect Angstrom like that. It had to be NASA arrogance.
 Limot @limot.bsky.social · 8h
Your department may be familiar with "Saturation".

What do you think of this take? Is your department able to see how hilarious this is, in retrospect? What about allegation of rudeness and disrespect to a giant of physics? Is that how scientists should behave?

limotsnewsletter.com/2025/02/22/m...
Reposted by Limot
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 8h
So Professor Oreskes, there is an interesting History of Science topic here. How did the Democrats succeed in making you all debase yourself to this extent?

You were expected to have some self-respect for your achievements, your position, Harvard, academia, and here you were elbowing to join what I
1 1
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 8h
Your department may be familiar with "Saturation".

What do you think of this take? Is your department able to see how hilarious this is, in retrospect? What about allegation of rudeness and disrespect to a giant of physics? Is that how scientists should behave?

limotsnewsletter.com/2025/02/22/m...
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 8h
Oh, and since you specialize in history, how is my recapitulation of the history here?

bsky.app/profile/limo...
 Limot @limot.bsky.social · 8h
Sorry, I hadn't checked your bio.

Ok, so this is physics history on the subject

1. Foote discovered Global Warming
2. Everyone was very concerned for half a century, then
3. Angstrom (not Foote) discovered that the available energy was only capable of minor warming which was already over.
1
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 8h
the warming to Greenhouse Gases.

The basic warming is from 255 to 288K, and the 33 degree comes from 'e', NASA mis-attributed the 33 degrees to GHG. From ignorance of 'e'.

Everything else is funding-derived misdirection and often knowing fraud.
1
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 8h
4. NASA scientists re-animated the alarm, but they were utterly uninformed on 1-3 above and did not understand their own fundamental equation. There is an "e" in the relevant equation which they missed. The warming comes from "e", but not knowing about it yet having watched Sci-Fi, they attributed
1
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 8h
Sorry, I hadn't checked your bio.

Ok, so this is physics history on the subject

1. Foote discovered Global Warming
2. Everyone was very concerned for half a century, then
3. Angstrom (not Foote) discovered that the available energy was only capable of minor warming which was already over.
1
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 8h
pigs on the trough. How did you all allow yourselves to be debased to such an extent?

How, oh how, did you all let Democrats (led by a Harvard dropout) do this to you?

What do you say to this rather simple summation of the funding angle?

www.slideshare.net/MukeshPrasad...
Climate change presentation
This document summarizes Mukesh Prasad's presentation on climate change. It discusses how Prasad, as a Mensa member, researched the topic and found that the basic explanation for climate change being caused by increased CO2 levels is incomplete. His analysis of satellite data and ice core records showed that CO2 levels followed, rather than led, temperature changes in the past. He argues this calls into question the certainty of predictions from climate models, which do not account for the observed leveling off of increased warming from rising CO2 concentrations. - Download as a PPTX, PDF or view online for free
www.slideshare.net
1
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 8h
This whole "oil funded denier" angle was preposterous. Relatively bit-player oil execs have been taking on and fooling in broad daylight the titans of industry - Elon Musk, Warren Buffet, Bill Gates.. seriously?

It is not that serious scholarship wasn't available, but it was suppressed by the
1
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 8h
Not that academia didn't join in the self-debasement. Surely, they were not so intellectually retarded that they couldn't see through "every donation, every contribution, to Right-wing causes was about denying climate change." Yet such angles went unchallenged through "peer review" and publication.
1
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 8h
have described as "pigs eating at the trough of Democrat largesse."

Surely you are not so feeble minded as to fail to understand what everybody in academia knew - there was no funding available to question climate change. I mean, this would have been called "self-evident" in normal academic dialog.
1
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 8h
So Professor Oreskes, there is an interesting History of Science topic here. How did the Democrats succeed in making you all debase yourself to this extent?

You were expected to have some self-respect for your achievements, your position, Harvard, academia, and here you were elbowing to join what I
1 1
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 9h
It is physics.

You might want to contact a local physics expert to assist - I am sorry but it's obvious you have no clue of physics never mind Thermodynamics, and haven't been able to understand what is the article all about.

It is not physically possible for Greenhouse Gases to cause warming.
1
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 14h
In the spirit of fairness you should be given a chance to defend yourself, so I searched for you and viola, here you were.

bsky.app/profile/limo...
 Limot @limot.bsky.social · 15h
I doubt professor Oreskes or you Prof Rahmstorf or any climate "scientists" are honest enough to engage on actual scientific challenges. Can you engage professor?

Professor Oreskes is an astute politician obviously, but can she unmask Mukesh Prasad?

Here:

limotsnewsletter.com/2025/02/22/m...
Exposé of Manmade Climate Change Theory
The theory of manmade climate change happens to be scientifically incorrect. The warming itself was discovered by Eunice Foote in 1856. But the theory is not wrong because she is a woman. She was a…
limotsnewsletter.com
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 15h
Dude, in this movie you are just a dupe of Evil Empire, and here is the very hard shot that blows up the Evil Empire. Only, this is all for real. I didn't need any makeup or special effects to take this shot.

limotsnewsletter.com/2025/02/22/m...
Exposé of Manmade Climate Change Theory
The theory of manmade climate change happens to be scientifically incorrect. The warming itself was discovered by Eunice Foote in 1856. But the theory is not wrong because she is a woman. She was a…
limotsnewsletter.com
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 15h
I doubt professor Oreskes or you Prof Rahmstorf or any climate "scientists" are honest enough to engage on actual scientific challenges. Can you engage professor?

Professor Oreskes is an astute politician obviously, but can she unmask Mukesh Prasad?

Here:

limotsnewsletter.com/2025/02/22/m...
Exposé of Manmade Climate Change Theory
The theory of manmade climate change happens to be scientifically incorrect. The warming itself was discovered by Eunice Foote in 1856. But the theory is not wrong because she is a woman. She was a…
limotsnewsletter.com
1 1
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 1d
they have to make do with the General they have. But they are rebels against the massive lies and massive censorship and massive corruption of the Empire. It's not their fault the leadership that was available is incompetent / noxious. No other Republican dared take on the Evil Empire of Democrats.
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 1d
hospital staff is now refusing the boosters for themselves. I saw the number 85%.

If not taking the boosters, you can't honestly claim that the vaccine propaganda wasn't all baloney. Then you can't honestly claim the Democrats have not been the evil Empire. The rebels don't have a good leader, and
1 2
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 1d
have figured it out. Some unfortunates, likely not long for this world, keep trusting in more vaccines and more masking. Their doctors have no idea how to help them, so they just go for more vaccines and more masks. In fact, the vaccines and boosters generate much revenue for hospitals. Yet, most
1 2
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 1d
are many people suffering from "Long Covid." Yet there is no such thing as Long Covid among the unvaccinated. The research papers claiming Long Covid exists among unvaccinated, are fraudulent, they get their results by redefining "unvaccinated."

Long Covid is just vaccine side effects. Many people
1 2
Limot @limot.bsky.social · 1d
I mean, look, believe it or not, manmade climate change is not just flat wrong, it is IDIOTIC from a physics perspective, and I that's something I have proved for world and history. Idiotic.

Covid was not an emergency of any kind. The vaccine was unnecessary. It was very unsafe.

Right now, there
1 2