Lils 🏳️⚧️
@lillabit.com
she/her • north east trans woman (unless you’re my boss, then I’m cis) • reading & writing queer stuff
Pinned
Lils 🏳️⚧️
@lillabit.com
· Aug 25
Interstitial Entity
A trans shapeshifter is forced to blur the lines between her perfectly compartmentalised identities when an evil force begins targeting her community. Urban fantasy meets dark queer comedy.
www.scribblehub.com
During the day, she helps catch monsters. At night, she works in a gay bar. But when trans girls around the city start disappearing, Cassie struggles to keep her two lives - and identities - distinct.
Interstitial Entity is urban fantasy meets dark queer comedy.
www.scribblehub.com/series/14824...
Interstitial Entity is urban fantasy meets dark queer comedy.
www.scribblehub.com/series/14824...
The real focus has to be on getting new legislation. The ECHR is one route for that, and the GLP are an effective means of pushing for that. The other necessary route is to do what we can to get Starmer and his minions out of office.
February 14, 2026 at 1:05 PM
The real focus has to be on getting new legislation. The ECHR is one route for that, and the GLP are an effective means of pushing for that. The other necessary route is to do what we can to get Starmer and his minions out of office.
I like the Good Law Project and I try to chuck money their way every month, but the way they’ve handled this judgement - trying to act like it’s a mixed bag, rather than an utter disaster, has given people false confidence that is going to get them hurt.
February 14, 2026 at 1:02 PM
I like the Good Law Project and I try to chuck money their way every month, but the way they’ve handled this judgement - trying to act like it’s a mixed bag, rather than an utter disaster, has given people false confidence that is going to get them hurt.
“If your employer tells you not to use the toilet, you shouldn’t comply in advance!”
That’s your decision & I respect it. But you can be terminated for disobeying that instruction, and you should be aware of that. The law is not on our side. I’m sorry.
That’s your decision & I respect it. But you can be terminated for disobeying that instruction, and you should be aware of that. The law is not on our side. I’m sorry.
February 14, 2026 at 1:01 PM
“If your employer tells you not to use the toilet, you shouldn’t comply in advance!”
That’s your decision & I respect it. But you can be terminated for disobeying that instruction, and you should be aware of that. The law is not on our side. I’m sorry.
That’s your decision & I respect it. But you can be terminated for disobeying that instruction, and you should be aware of that. The law is not on our side. I’m sorry.
So many people are trying gotchas like “well what if a workplace only has one set of toilets for employees and customers?”
Then the toilets have to be “single-sex” (trans exclusive), so that the employer satisfies their duties under the 1992 regs.
Then the toilets have to be “single-sex” (trans exclusive), so that the employer satisfies their duties under the 1992 regs.
February 14, 2026 at 12:59 PM
So many people are trying gotchas like “well what if a workplace only has one set of toilets for employees and customers?”
Then the toilets have to be “single-sex” (trans exclusive), so that the employer satisfies their duties under the 1992 regs.
Then the toilets have to be “single-sex” (trans exclusive), so that the employer satisfies their duties under the 1992 regs.
Yesterday was a vindication for Girlguiding and the Women’s Institute - because it proved that their lawyers were right. They wouldn’t be able to win this battle, because being trans-inclusive is - as bizzare as it is - now illegal. And that’s the government’s doing, not theirs.
February 14, 2026 at 12:58 PM
Yesterday was a vindication for Girlguiding and the Women’s Institute - because it proved that their lawyers were right. They wouldn’t be able to win this battle, because being trans-inclusive is - as bizzare as it is - now illegal. And that’s the government’s doing, not theirs.
I hate how much of the trans community still have their fingers in their ears and believe that the law is still on our side in a post-FWS world. We cannot fix this mess without new legislation, there is no other way out of this.
February 14, 2026 at 12:57 PM
I hate how much of the trans community still have their fingers in their ears and believe that the law is still on our side in a post-FWS world. We cannot fix this mess without new legislation, there is no other way out of this.
i saw the hot chocolate glow
February 14, 2026 at 12:45 PM
i saw the hot chocolate glow
Trans women culture is sending each other TikToks that say things like “send this to the gayest dude u know”
February 13, 2026 at 8:43 PM
Trans women culture is sending each other TikToks that say things like “send this to the gayest dude u know”
My understanding is that they are two different organisations so wouldn’t be directly comparable in that sense. I could be wrong!
February 13, 2026 at 4:12 PM
My understanding is that they are two different organisations so wouldn’t be directly comparable in that sense. I could be wrong!
It seems that we’re copying the TERF strategy of “pretend everything’s a win”, but the difference is that our losses cause harm to actual people.
February 13, 2026 at 12:17 PM
It seems that we’re copying the TERF strategy of “pretend everything’s a win”, but the difference is that our losses cause harm to actual people.
Usually I’m the one screaming “it’s not as bad as you think!” after something like this, but everybody seems to be celebrating as if this is positive. We’re in a worse position than we were yesterday & I’m pretty disappointed with the GLP for not acknowledging that.
February 13, 2026 at 12:13 PM
Usually I’m the one screaming “it’s not as bad as you think!” after something like this, but everybody seems to be celebrating as if this is positive. We’re in a worse position than we were yesterday & I’m pretty disappointed with the GLP for not acknowledging that.
It’s lawful to be trans-inclusive, if you have an equivalent service for both sexes.
It’s unlawful to be trans-inclusive, if you are an employer or you are a single-sex service with no direct equivalent (e.g. Girlguiding).
It’s unlawful to be trans-inclusive, if you are an employer or you are a single-sex service with no direct equivalent (e.g. Girlguiding).
February 13, 2026 at 11:49 AM
It’s lawful to be trans-inclusive, if you have an equivalent service for both sexes.
It’s unlawful to be trans-inclusive, if you are an employer or you are a single-sex service with no direct equivalent (e.g. Girlguiding).
It’s unlawful to be trans-inclusive, if you are an employer or you are a single-sex service with no direct equivalent (e.g. Girlguiding).
I have read the judgement and my conclusion as not a lawyer but have unfortunately spent too much time researching legal stuff:
This is (almost entirely) very bad.
This is (almost entirely) very bad.
I’m pretty confused about the GLP v EHRC judgement. The press release from GLP seems quite contradictory in places, so I’m very worried that it’s primarily copium
February 13, 2026 at 11:45 AM
I have read the judgement and my conclusion as not a lawyer but have unfortunately spent too much time researching legal stuff:
This is (almost entirely) very bad.
This is (almost entirely) very bad.
I’m pretty confused about the GLP v EHRC judgement. The press release from GLP seems quite contradictory in places, so I’m very worried that it’s primarily copium
February 13, 2026 at 11:15 AM
I’m pretty confused about the GLP v EHRC judgement. The press release from GLP seems quite contradictory in places, so I’m very worried that it’s primarily copium
can we go 2 for 2 on government humiliations in the court 🙏
February 13, 2026 at 10:33 AM
can we go 2 for 2 on government humiliations in the court 🙏
The two times that I’ve come the closest to death were:
i) when my parents discovered my clothes and severely mocked and interrogated me.
ii) when the shame from family led to me attempting to detransition for 6 months.
i) when my parents discovered my clothes and severely mocked and interrogated me.
ii) when the shame from family led to me attempting to detransition for 6 months.
February 13, 2026 at 9:48 AM
The two times that I’ve come the closest to death were:
i) when my parents discovered my clothes and severely mocked and interrogated me.
ii) when the shame from family led to me attempting to detransition for 6 months.
i) when my parents discovered my clothes and severely mocked and interrogated me.
ii) when the shame from family led to me attempting to detransition for 6 months.
The current guidance would’ve killed me as a teen. Being able to socially transition at school, without my parents’ knowledge, was a lifeline for my mental health.
February 13, 2026 at 9:44 AM
The current guidance would’ve killed me as a teen. Being able to socially transition at school, without my parents’ knowledge, was a lifeline for my mental health.
Mildly hopeful about GLP v EHRC tomorrow, because somebody has to be!
February 12, 2026 at 3:27 PM
Mildly hopeful about GLP v EHRC tomorrow, because somebody has to be!
I think that in the current circumstance, until we have new legislation or an opportunity to take things to the ECHR, this is the best that they can realistically argue post-FWS. It would be very difficult to argue that FWS does not give orgs the right to exclude by so-called “biological sex”
February 12, 2026 at 3:22 PM
I think that in the current circumstance, until we have new legislation or an opportunity to take things to the ECHR, this is the best that they can realistically argue post-FWS. It would be very difficult to argue that FWS does not give orgs the right to exclude by so-called “biological sex”
My understanding, and I might be wrong, is that the GLP’s hopeful interpretation is that it is not unlawful to be either trans-exclusive or trans-inclusive (as the EHRC guidance claims) - except for in the case of employers where inclusion is mandated, due to Workplace Health and Safety Regs 1992
February 12, 2026 at 3:08 PM
My understanding, and I might be wrong, is that the GLP’s hopeful interpretation is that it is not unlawful to be either trans-exclusive or trans-inclusive (as the EHRC guidance claims) - except for in the case of employers where inclusion is mandated, due to Workplace Health and Safety Regs 1992
Best case: They find that the EHRC guidance was unlawful and that employers cannot ban trans people from the correct toilets.
Worst case: They say that the EHRC guidance was fine, which gives gov the go-ahead to push forwards.
Likely case: “The guidance was withdrawn so it doesn’t matter anymore”
Worst case: They say that the EHRC guidance was fine, which gives gov the go-ahead to push forwards.
Likely case: “The guidance was withdrawn so it doesn’t matter anymore”
February 12, 2026 at 3:03 PM
Best case: They find that the EHRC guidance was unlawful and that employers cannot ban trans people from the correct toilets.
Worst case: They say that the EHRC guidance was fine, which gives gov the go-ahead to push forwards.
Likely case: “The guidance was withdrawn so it doesn’t matter anymore”
Worst case: They say that the EHRC guidance was fine, which gives gov the go-ahead to push forwards.
Likely case: “The guidance was withdrawn so it doesn’t matter anymore”
tbh if anybody should be worried about AI slop taking their job it's the writer of fucking Deadpool & Wolverine
‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ writer Rhett Reese reacts to viral AI video of Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt fighting:
“I hate to say it. It’s likely over for us.”
“I hate to say it. It’s likely over for us.”
February 11, 2026 at 11:54 PM
tbh if anybody should be worried about AI slop taking their job it's the writer of fucking Deadpool & Wolverine
BREAKING: The EHRC has published interim guidance telling supermarkets that it is now illegal to stock Oatly in semi-skimmed spaces
🚨 NEW: The Supreme Court has ruled that oat milk can no longer be called milk
February 11, 2026 at 9:30 PM
BREAKING: The EHRC has published interim guidance telling supermarkets that it is now illegal to stock Oatly in semi-skimmed spaces
should’ve known Starmer was safe the second terminal loser Sarwar turned against him
February 10, 2026 at 11:30 AM
should’ve known Starmer was safe the second terminal loser Sarwar turned against him
