Lauren Vanderdeen
@lauvande.bsky.social
2.3K followers 700 following 530 posts
Reporter 📰 Can talk cities, suburbs and CP style till the cows come home. [email protected]
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
lauvande.bsky.social
HEY BURNABY, NEW WEST AND TRICITIES!!!!!

My former colleagues have launched a non-profit, co-op community news outlet!

These four are real pros and have been wonderful mentors to me. Can’t wait to see where this goes.

Read and share 🗞️🗞️🗞️ www.freshetnews.ca
Freshet News
Top Stories Burnaby New Westminster Tri-Cities All
www.freshetnews.ca
lauvande.bsky.social
Thank you Chris!! :) keep in touch for all things Burnaby and cycling
lauvande.bsky.social
Thank you so much Reilly :) I really appreciate it.
lauvande.bsky.social
This story has completely burrowed into my brain because it reaches deeply into so many aspects of how cities and communities are built. Grateful I could work on it.
jmcelroy.bsky.social
7 years ago, Burnaby had more than a billion dollars in reserve for capital projects, and a big question was what they would do with it.

Now, their infrastructure projects underway are $300 million over initial budgets, and the way they built up that reserve is no longer viable.
Burnaby's $1.2B capital reserve 'basically exhausted.' What happened and what's next? | CBC News
The city's $1.2-billion in capital reserves won't stretch as far as planned due to soaring construction costs, and city officials say new provincial legislation could make it harder to replenish its c...
www.cbc.ca
lauvande.bsky.social
Really appreciated the discussion here, thanks Stewart! Also I hear your critiques @oweninvan.bsky.social :) got me thinking on the very embedded growth-pays-for-growth principle.
lauvande.bsky.social
The goal for the corp. is for it to be eventually self-sustaining, but ofc who knows how long that could take.

Interesting Victoria report, thanks for sharing!
lauvande.bsky.social
The money Burnaby collected through density bonus went 80% towards community amenity projects and 20% to affordable housing initiatives. There's $100 million allocated to the Burnaby Housing Authority in that housing reserve, which is now also exhausted. (It was never $1B to BHA.) ...
lauvande.bsky.social
this is my roman empire
jmcelroy.bsky.social
seeing the world is amazing but you know what's even more amazing?

talking about municipal financial reserves and the tradeoffs between different forms of developer benefits

i'll have that story about burnaby with @cbcstephenquinn.bsky.social on the early edition next

wait where are you going
lauvande.bsky.social
The rest of the reports flew by - adjourned!
lauvande.bsky.social
Next up, the city has registered its frustration with province's new development financing mechanisms.

It's lobbying other municipalities to make the same complaints and suggestions to the Ministry of Housing and Municipal Affairs.

Report passes.

pub-burnaby.escribemeetings.com/filestream.a...
pub-burnaby.escribemeetings.com
lauvande.bsky.social
Dhaliwal and Calendino are in favour of the amendment, the rest of the councillors oppose. Back to the main motion.
Dhaliwal opposes, the rest in favour - it passes.
lauvande.bsky.social
GM reiterates the recommendations in relation to height-based framework and inclusionary zoning are financially viable.
director: lower # of storeys (i missed the #) are not viable, those arent included in the recommendations.
lauvande.bsky.social
there's some fairly technical q's and clarification on height-based framework and base density here. you don't want my abbreviated attempts to report on it here hahaha
lauvande.bsky.social
sorry for typos, i blame my computer slowing down.

GM: development under current system and reason for rush to complete rezoning before June 30 is to avoid payments of ACC/DCC. ... FAR and height-based framework aren't the problem, it's introduction of ACC and DCC.
lauvande.bsky.social
GM planning: would have to take back to get fuller understanding of how those two systems coincide but my gut reaction is taht it would be very challenging.

(lauren's intuition VALIDATED)
lauvande.bsky.social
(parenthetical quote was a mini-editorializing on my behalf... sorry lol)

Dhaliwal: makes amendment that inclusionary zoning rental requirement is mandatory if developer chooses height based approach to development.

Hurley: completely changes the intent of the OCP
lauvande.bsky.social
Dhaliwal would recommend not making height-based mandatory, allowing developers to choose between height-based and FAR.

(my guess is that this would drive staff wild... not consistent)
lauvande.bsky.social
any rental inclusionary or market rental needs to be done with provincial help. they've got to provide a lot more support for the development community. ... i'm afraid this is going to delay development applications.
lauvande.bsky.social
a vast amount of free density is needed to make any inclusionary numbers work, that's why we're going up to 40 storeys where the province had said 20 stories would be adequate.
lauvande.bsky.social
Dhaliwal: like everyone else ... we have tried very hard to secure housing for our community, and we were very successful prior to the province meddling in the process. a different world now.
lauvande.bsky.social
... When conditions improve, expect the percentages to improve.

Inclusionary policy is consistent way to provide rent-controlled units throughout the city. CMHC median is a form of rent control
lauvande.bsky.social
Notes staff have ability to ensure timelines for projects to when project starts from application received to shovels in the ground. Assurance is important to make sure the inclusionary percentages are living policy and reflective of market conditions. ...
lauvande.bsky.social
Gu calls it a "challenging topic" and notes there's progress since the first recommendations since last fall.
Hopes the CBB (mentioned before) will help to get inclusionary rental units in a developer's pro forma ... Zero affordable housing is worse than some, even at reduced percentages.