lake county democrat
lakecountydem.bsky.social
lake county democrat
@lakecountydem.bsky.social
2.2K followers 310 following 1.5K posts
Chicagoland. You had me at politics/baseball/road trips/tv/fast food/dad jokes.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Oh, please please please ignore Chicago - pay no attention to what happened to Zohran's ideological counterpart in the 1.5 years since his election and the boon it's been to the local and state center-left. I'll never bother you again!
Our mayor did it in his first month in office and here (Chicago) it's only consulates, not embassies. (PS - our mayor is also Zorhan's ideological counterpart and is polling at 8% after 1.5 years in office, he's ironically been a boon to the center-left, but I suspect ZH is more competent.
For the lost-count time, the antisemitism isn't having anti-Israli sentiments. I've been harshly critical of Israel on the West Bank settlements (and treatment of settler violence). The antisemitism comes in the double standards. A racist cop will claim they're merely anti-crime.
If you don't also oppose [list countries here] existing as a [their respective race/religion] state, absolutely.
treats all these consistently, I'll totally give him credit (and publicly). As for his mom, it's only that he's going to be familiar with the example, not that he necessarily shares views with her or vice-vera.
Had not seen this - had seen a "we asked campaign, got no response." Actually that says he'd apply the same standard but doesn't specifically agree as to those nations, and then gives a distinction to justify focus on Israel Let's see if he visits the Pakstian/Japan/Saudi/etc. embassies. If he
It's the other way around: by his alleged standard for not recognizing Israel's right to exist, he would similarly reject Pakistan's right to exist, an example he is clearly aware of and that he was later asked about.
Denounce away - but you still recognize their right to exist.
Fun talking to the dozens of you but family dinner comes first - anyone honestly wanting to debate this further is welcome to DM.
We're talking about his standard, not yours, dawg.
The point is that he is aware Pakistan violates his alleged standard for a right to exist - but you knew that, hence the contortion to "advocating for Pakistan's right to oppress all non-Muslims" (which itself is contorted - she's a critic of Hindu nationalism).
Because it violates his alleged standard for when to recognize a nation's right to exist. Try to keep up.
"You just said that the Pride Parade has no right to exist, because no theme based parades should exist. But you're good with all the other parades - your family even participates in them. Do you condemn those too, or only the LGBTQ one?" Fixed it for you.
I've been so anti-Israel policy on things like the settlements that it's illegal to advocate a couple of them from within Israel. But I don't think you can be antizionist (i.e., against an Israel of some boundaries per the 1948 partition) unless you have some extreme views on other partitions.
mention Pan Arabism itself). If anything, the experience of the Jews and the Kurds shows that MANY minorities in the region deserve a homeland or at least autonomous area (Yazidis, B'haihs, etc.).
be sympathetic. Native Americans were driven from their lands as recently as 200 years ago - an eyeblink in history. And this is before even getting into the centuries of Jim Crow-like laws against Jews (and Christians) in pre-British Palestine and elsewhere in the Middle East/Persia (not to
I don't think your "new country" exception withstands analysis. Pakistan, created by violent partition with far more people driven from their ancestral lands, happened one year earlier (and for a very similar reason). If Sindhi Hindus started launching murder/rape raids into Karachi, nobody would
I said she's accused of it - the point is he's not ignorant to these nations, particularly Pakistan. But I suspect you knew that.
But let's get real - do we really need to ask if he rejects the right of Pakistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Japan, etc. to exist? Not their constitutions and laws per se, but their nationhood? Come on.
Not just Pakistan (or even Middle Eastern states and Iran - Japan is another example that violates his purported standard) but it's the example I and others have used. And my recollection is that someone in the media (probably a biased outlet) asked his campaign and didn't receive an answer. (Ctd)
Simply not true. His response was "I would not recognize any state's right to exist with a system of hierarchy on the basis of race or religion." And to suggest that he was just asked about the reality of Israel's existence is simply gaslighting.
Not true - in Pakistan Christians are not allowed to publicly practice their faith, it is illegal to seek converts (a commandment in the New Testament) and a felony for Muslims to convert. That's not a blessing of the BJP by any means - we once banned Modi for inciting Islamophobic riots.
Huh - not sure why it's not there. It's illegal to practice their faith openly, they cannot seek converts (which is a big part of their faith), and it is a felony to convert a Muslim (and for a Muslim to convert).
(and many other similarly governed nations), he gave a response on Israel that was patently *not* his position. I also believe he was asked about Pakistan and his campaign didn't respond to the inquiry.
illegal to do so within Israel. That's not what Gaza was (if you want to talk certain war crimes, that would be a different matter). I don't favor a rule of war that would have left Hitler in power if in 1943 he had thought to embed stormtroopers with the population. As for ZM and Pakistan, he