Justia’s Verdict
justiaverdict.bsky.social
Justia’s Verdict
@justiaverdict.bsky.social
250 followers 780 following 56 posts
Legal analysis and commentary from Justia’s resident and guest columnists. Opinions are those of individual columnists and do not necessarily represent views of Justia. Not legal advice. http://verdict.justia.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Justia’s Verdict
Promoting their respective new books, Justices Sotomayor & Barrett sat for interviews. As I explain on @justiaverdict.bsky.social, each offered pablum about SCOTUS. Barrett also sowed confusion about fundamental rights & displayed obliviousness to the Trump administration's threat to democracy.👇
Justices Sotomayor and Barrett Are Must-See TV—But Not in a Good Way
Cornell Law professor Michael C. Dorf examines recent interviews with Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Sonia Sotomayor, focusing primarily on Barrett’s CBS interview and both Justices’ comments on the S...
verdict.justia.com
Prof. Meredith Miller explores the complex state-by-state landscape of non-compete agreements, following the failed federal effort to ban them. She argues that outright bans offer the clearest, fairest solution for both employers and employees.
The Current Status of Non-Compete Agreements: It’s Complicated
Albany Law School professor Meredith R. Miller examines the complex and evolving legal landscape of non-compete agreements in the United States, highlighting how their enforceability varies widely acr...
verdict.justia.com
@kathrynrobb.bsky.social argues that media fixation on the Epstein list obscures America's child sexual abuse epidemic. Instead, focus should be on concrete reforms: ending statutes of limitations, banning NDAs in abuse cases, and mandating institutional accountability to protect children.
Epstein, the Headlines, and the Children We Ignore
Kathryn Robb, National Director of the Children’s Justice Campaign at Enough Abuse, examines how the media and political frenzy over Jeffrey Epstein’s client list has overshadowed the broader epidemic...
verdict.justia.com
Joseph Margulies explains why he eschews daily political outrage to seek more profound understanding. He argues for crafting a comprehensive narrative that explains our moment—accounting for economic transformation, demographic shifts, and the decline of white hegemony.
The Thing Itself
Cornell professor Joseph Margulies explains why he chooses not to follow the daily outrages of the Trump administration, instead focusing on understanding the broader narrative and underlying forces t...
verdict.justia.com
Four law professors debate whether secession could happen in modern America. While most agree geographic realities make state secession unlikely, author @rodgerdcitron.bsky.social explores how "soft secession" through sanctuary cities and nullification may already be occurring.
No Exit: There’s Been Talk of Secession; Could It Occur Nowadays?
Touro University, Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center professor Rodger Citron examines whether Americans should be concerned about the prospect of secession in today’s politically polarized climate, compili...
verdict.justia.com
Reposted by Justia’s Verdict
In my new column on @justiaverdict.bsky.social I say the SCOTUS ruling upholding Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors avoided the harshest anti-trans rhetoric, but in treating the ban as a good-faith effort to protect health and ensure informed consent, the Court sanitized bigotry. 👇
The Roberts Court Puts a Velvet Glove on the Iron Fist of Anti-Trans Backlash
Cornell Law professor Michael C. Dorf examines the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Skrmetti upholding Tennessee’s SB1 law banning gender-affirming care for transgender minors. Professor D...
verdict.justia.com
Reposted by Justia’s Verdict
Ronald Reagan proposed a missile defense system that came to be called Star Wars. It was expensive, impractical, and a violation of a treaty then in force. Trump has proposed Golden Dome--a Star Wars sequel so bad it should feature Jar Jar Binks. Details in my column for @justiaverdict.bsky.social 👇
Golden Dome is the Worst Star Wars Sequel Ever
Cornell Law professor Michael C. Dorf critiques President Donald Trump’s proposed “Golden Dome” missile defense system, positioning it as a modern sequel to Reagan’s failed “Star Wars” initiative, and...
verdict.justia.com
Cornell professor Joseph Margulies challenges Stephen Miller's call to reopen Alcatraz, arguing that true justice requires recognizing the potential for redemption among incarcerated individuals—something Miller overlooks in favor of fear and exclusion.
Stephen, Go to Prison
Cornell professor Joseph Margulies critiques Stephen Miller’s advocacy for reopening Alcatraz as a symbolic place to isolate and permanently segregate violent offenders, using it as a lens to explore....
verdict.justia.com
Guest columnist Gary J. Simson argues that President Trump’s executive orders penalizing certain law firms mirror unconstitutional bills of attainder, warning they undermine core principles of justice and the rule of law. A Supreme Court reckoning may be necessary.
The President’s Orders Targeting Law Firms as Unconstitutional Bills of Attainder—Damning Lessons from the Past
Guest columnist Gary J. Simson—Macon Chair in Law at Mercer Law School and Professor Emeritus at Cornell Law School—critiques executive orders issued by President Donald Trump that punish specific law...
verdict.justia.com
Professor @rodgerdcitron.bsky.social reflects on Justice David Souter’s legacy and suggests that Souter‘s intellectual rigor and nuanced opinions in cases like Twombly and Mead, though admirable, may have unintentionally limited their long-term impact on the law.
The Justice Who May Have Been Too Smart for the Job
Touro University, Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center professor Rodger D. Citron examines the judicial legacy of Justice David Souter, focusing on how his intellectually rigorous and nuanced approach in key...
verdict.justia.com
Cornell Law professor @dorfonlaw.bsky.social reflects on Justice David Souter’s legacy, arguing that Souter embodied a principled, traditional conservatism rooted in judicial restraint—offering a stark contrast to today’s ideologically driven Supreme Court appointments.
Yes, More Souters, Please
Cornell Law professor Michael C. Dorf examines the judicial philosophy and legacy of Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter, contrasting him with ideologically driven judges and situating his approach....
verdict.justia.com
Reposted by Justia’s Verdict
@lcgriffin.bsky.social dissects this week's #SCOTUS oral argument in OK Charter School Board and argues that approving publicly funded religious charter schools—like Oklahoma's St. Isidore—violates the Establishment Clause and threatens religious neutrality in public education.
Just Say No to “Catholic Public” School
UNLV Boyd School of Law professor Leslie C. Griffin analyzes a pending U.S. Supreme Court case in which the State of Oklahoma is challenging the approval of a publicly funded Catholic charter school,....
verdict.justia.com
Reposted by Justia’s Verdict
My latest column for @justiaverdict.bsky.social argues that even if Trump's tariffs boost U.S. manufacturing (a very big "if"), they won't create many jobs. His effort to restore a 19th century economy leaves us woefully unprepared for the disruptive force of AI in the 21st century. 👇
Fighting the Last (Trade) War: Trump Ignores the Coming AI Revolution
Cornell Law professor Michael C. Dorf critiques the Trump administration’s tariff policies and broader economic strategy, arguing that they are misguided in the face of rapidly advancing technology, p...
verdict.justia.com