Josh Glancy
joshglancy.bsky.social
Josh Glancy
@joshglancy.bsky.social
950 followers 140 following 53 posts
Associate editor and columnist, The Sunday Times
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Not for a bit, I'd imagine
It's a 1300 word news interview in which I did my best to describe her biography and world view.

Within the article, there is a significant focus on immigration and its attendant issues such as the ECHR, because yes I do think that is important.
It's a 1300 word, one hour interview in which I did my best to describe her biography and world view. Yes we discussed Brexit, but there simply wasn't room to go into a lot of detail on every angle. I think people learned something from it.
And the immigration stuff was just one smallish chunk of a wide ranging discussion, though it has obviously blown up massively since.
I'd have liked to go into more detail, both with her and in the piece. There was more material on culture, but I didn't have space for it.

Easy to call people negligent, but as you note the article shared her position with the world, plenty have pushed her for further detail since.
Go on I'll bite. Why was I negligent?
Mass deportation of people with indefinite leave to remain was official Tory party policy - until Katie Lam spelled it out to me in a newspaper interview.

And now it ... isn't
More detail would no doubt have been helpful. But honestly I thought running her quotes at length, in which she sets out her reasoning for the policy, was the priority in the space I had. And I think the debate that followed has vindicated this.
You were replying to my post. In the third person. It's unusual.
Hi Jonathan, I had read about the Tory policy in preparation for the interview, which is why I asked her about it. I didn't have space or time to explore it in great detail, because I had much ground to cover. Others have run with it, which is good

Your patronising and snarky tone seems unnecessary
Hi Jonathan, you can talk at me rather than in the third person! I haven't misrepresented her policies. Nor have I "sanewashed" them, whatever that means. Just presented them to the world concisely, as it was a shortish profile interview that covered lots of ground, not a detailed policy debate.
The standfirst is a bit frothy. But other than that I'm not sure what you mean by "the blithe way it has been promoted". We described Katie as a hardliner in the headline, which she is.
There has been a torrent of discussion about the interview, which again feels like a good thing.

I framed her view as a sombre and radical position, because it is, but I'm not sure it's my place as an interviewer to insert masses of my own opinion. People can - and have - made their own minds up.
Hi Ben, I certainly take responsibility ahead of my editors.

I asked Katie about something that is official Tory party policy. She expressed a view in support of that. Lots of people found that view abhorrent. I think the interview served its purpose, because now people know what Tory policy is.
Well, I'm biased because she's my friend. But this week I went back to reread her piece after the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting, it's excellent.

www.nytimes.com/2018/11/02/o...
Opinion | When a Terrorist Comes to Your Hometown (Published 2018)
www.nytimes.com
I've been commissioned and edited by her a few times. I would say that she's actually a pretty good commissioning editor.
Reposted by Josh Glancy
Keir Starmer's lack of "vision" and "narrative" has become a cliche at this point. But this isn't just a PR problem. It has a real cost - in muddled hiring decisions and Whitehall not knowing what is it the PM actually wants to do.

My @thetimes.com column

www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/...
Starmer and his grown-ups can’t just invent a bold identity
The prime minister once described his pragmatism with pride. Now the absence of clear vision is becoming existential
www.thetimes.com
Reposted by Josh Glancy
Went on The Times podcast to talk about the Green Party leadership race and the new energy mustering on the left of British politics
Here's why Britain's Left is radicalising ⬇️

🎙️Listen now on The Story podcast: pod.fo/e/3222bb

🗣️ @joshglancy.bsky.social
For today's @thetimes.com read, I spoke to Labour MPs ahead of a seismic autumn for Starmer. The mood is ... existential

'It’s been a bizarrely quiet summer'

'I’m staggered by the lack of direction'

'It can’t carry on at this pace. It’s not sustainable'

www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/...
Is Keir Starmer blowing it? The PM is in for a stormy autumn
Labour MPs had hoped he’d take the fight to Nigel Farage by now. But here comes the budget … and, hanging over everything, the small boats crisis
www.thetimes.com
Think it was me who said this? Take your point on distinguishing between Farage and the online right, but I wasn't just referring to immigration. He's picked up a lot of momentum and attracted a lot of coversage on many different fronts