Joel David Hamkins
@joeldavidhamkins.bsky.social
1.2K followers 180 following 620 posts
Mathematics and Philosophy of the Infinite Professor of Logic, University of Notre Dame University of Oxford #InfinitelyMore #BookOfInfinity #PanoramaOfLogic #PhilMaths https://buymeacoffee.com/joeldavidhamkins
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
joeldavidhamkins.bsky.social
I am scheduled to be offering my course on Infinity next semester, and I have been a little worried that previously the class may have been a bit too hard, too demanding of the students. To correct this, my wife Barbara has suggested that I lecture instead on the half infinite.
joeldavidhamkins.bsky.social
See the full reading list here. bsky.app/profile/joel...
joeldavidhamkins.bsky.social
For your enjoyment, here is the reading list for my undergraduate core seminar this semester in Philosophy, Science, and Mathematics. We shall focus on topics in the philosophy of mathematics, philosophy of science, and philosophy of computability and AI.
joeldavidhamkins.bsky.social
This week's reading for my undergrad PhilSciMath core seminar. Looking forward to the discussion.
joeldavidhamkins.bsky.social
In the essay, I explain rather that the surreal omega x omega chessboard is equinumerous with the surreals themselves. This can be strictly larger than Ord in ZFC.
joeldavidhamkins.bsky.social
If V is equinumerous with On, then there is a global well order of V, which is the global choice axiom. This implies all proper classes are equinumerous. So when global choice fails, V is not equinumerous with On. (In ZFC, one speaks about definable classes and definable bijections between them.)
joeldavidhamkins.bsky.social
Well, you are definitely on the right track, since the naive answer, which I have heard from many people, is that there should be only countably many squares. But amongst the proper classes, how big is it? In ZFC, for example, not all proper classes have the same size.
Reposted by Joel David Hamkins
christianp.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy
Asked my pal from Somerset if he knew anyone capable of taking the square root of -𝑟².
"I are!" he said.
That's a proof by country diction.
Reposted by Joel David Hamkins
joeldavidhamkins.bsky.social
New post-doctoral position at Notre Dame
Core analytic/logic/phil math. philjobs.org/job/show/29622
2 year position, $75K annual salary plus $15K expense account. Please apply! (I am chairing this search.)
joeldavidhamkins.bsky.social
I think the best topics will be mathematically interesting and surprising. Should be accessible at first (since undergraduates) but grow in sophistication (since Caltech). I have several ideas, but would be interested to hear people's requests and suggestions.
joeldavidhamkins.bsky.social
I am deeply honored to be invited to give the De Prima lecture at Caltech this fall, a distinguished annual math lecture aimed primarily at undergraduates. Help me decide on a topic! What would you request, drawing from topics on which you've seen me write or speak?
joeldavidhamkins.bsky.social
I deleted an earlier version of this post, since I had screwed up the quotation marks! I hope it is right now.
joeldavidhamkins.bsky.social
And the author reply to critics:

"On 'On "On"' and 'On "On 'on'"'".

(Note: CMS nested quote rule.)
joeldavidhamkins.bsky.social
What is the view you are pointing out? We are to think of Lotks-Volterra in a Kuhnian light?
joeldavidhamkins.bsky.social
Full reading list here. bsky.app/profile/joel...
joeldavidhamkins.bsky.social
For your enjoyment, here is the reading list for my undergraduate core seminar this semester in Philosophy, Science, and Mathematics. We shall focus on topics in the philosophy of mathematics, philosophy of science, and philosophy of computability and AI.
joeldavidhamkins.bsky.social
This week's reading for my undergrad PhilSciMath core seminar. Looking forward to the discussion.
joeldavidhamkins.bsky.social
Attending team summit STOP Boss and colleagues have now boarded the hot-air balloon STOP Ready to cut them loose STOP
joeldavidhamkins.bsky.social
Detail from student quiz on Lakatos, Proofs and Refutations.
joeldavidhamkins.bsky.social
Overheard: the wife says "You're always wrong" and the husband replies "You're right".