jeffspence.github.io
In new work @nature.com with @hakha.bsky.social, @jkpritch.bsky.social, and our wonderful coauthors we find that the key factors are what we call Specificity, Length, and Luck!
🧬🧪🧵
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
(19/27)
(19/27)
academic.oup.com/genetics/art...
(16/27)
academic.oup.com/genetics/art...
(16/27)
(5/27)
(5/27)
We examine the accuracy of PGS predictions at the individual level. We make 3 observations that expose gaps in our understanding of PGS “portability.”
rdcu.be/e0LAr
(1/27)
We examine the accuracy of PGS predictions at the individual level. We make 3 observations that expose gaps in our understanding of PGS “portability.”
rdcu.be/e0LAr
(1/27)
Yes, doing things well might be boring. But doing them badly is... bad
Yes, doing things well might be boring. But doing them badly is... bad
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
“Characterising the detectable and invisible fractions of genomic loci under balancing selection”
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
First authors: @saracarioscia.bsky.social & @aabiddanda.github.io
First authors: @saracarioscia.bsky.social & @aabiddanda.github.io
humangenetics.ucsf.edu/ihg-seminar-...
humangenetics.ucsf.edu/ihg-seminar-...
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
Malaria population genetic studies have found some puzzling patterns: Ne estimates spanning orders of magnitude, genome-wide negative Tajima's D, and over a quarter of genes with πN/πS >1
1/n
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
Malaria population genetic studies have found some puzzling patterns: Ne estimates spanning orders of magnitude, genome-wide negative Tajima's D, and over a quarter of genes with πN/πS >1
1/n
How do recruitment into genetic studies and study characteristics impact what we infer about the genetic bases of traits, and what are the consequences? (1/21)
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
How do recruitment into genetic studies and study characteristics impact what we infer about the genetic bases of traits, and what are the consequences? (1/21)
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
arxiv.org/abs/2601.05367
arxiv.org/abs/2601.05367
Very nice @medrxivpreprint.bsky.social study by @zeyunlu.bsky.social @sashagusevposts.bsky.social & colleagues 🧪🧬
www.medrxiv.org/content/10.6...
Very nice @medrxivpreprint.bsky.social study by @zeyunlu.bsky.social @sashagusevposts.bsky.social & colleagues 🧪🧬
www.medrxiv.org/content/10.6...
In a new pre-print, we find that TWAS gets the sign wrong around 20-30% of the time!
doi.org/10.64898/202...
1/n
In a new pre-print, we find that TWAS gets the sign wrong around 20-30% of the time!
doi.org/10.64898/202...
1/n
Very worryingly we find that TWAS gets the sign wrong around 1/3 of the time (compared to 50% for pure guessing). You can read more about our analysis here, and what we think is going on 👇
In a new pre-print, we find that TWAS gets the sign wrong around 20-30% of the time!
doi.org/10.64898/202...
1/n
Very worryingly we find that TWAS gets the sign wrong around 1/3 of the time (compared to 50% for pure guessing). You can read more about our analysis here, and what we think is going on 👇
#Genetics #AI #Anthropic
secure.anthropiccopyrightsettlement.com/lookup
#Genetics #AI #Anthropic
secure.anthropiccopyrightsettlement.com/lookup