Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

adichotomyofone

@jasonlee.adichotomy.com

2.8K followers 3.7K following 1.4K posts

Nonduality, philosophy, sciences… Contact page: https://linkr.adichotomy.com/munkiman/ Inspire, create, unite. Writing an attempted intuitive self-narrative. Liberally applied. Graphic production artist. 💕Cats and reptiles. ENJF-A in PNW

linkr.adichotomy.com

Posts Media Videos Starter Packs

Pinned

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 4d

It means effortless action, or in different words, action without an independent doer. #philsci

In the same vain as non-duality means duality as the only thing occurring, without some other “independent, untouched sort of thing” causing it to happen.

Peter Adamson @histphilosophy.bsky.social · 4d

Today's new installment in the Philosophy in China series: Non-Action in the Laozi (Daodejing)

The concept of wuwei or “non-action”: does it mean that the perfect sage or political ruler simply never does anything?

www.historyofphilosophy.net/laozi-non-ac...

#podcasts #daoism #daodejing #philsky

3 7

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 2h

Technically they are “chemtrails”, just not the kind they seem to think they are.

1 1

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 16h

Inequalities among people, is irrelevant to what was being expressed. Any equality requires an imbalance.

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 17h

Not just a consequence of communities, genes or any other thing, for certain.

1 1

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 20h

If the very nature of being, of reality is conflict as distinction, you wouldn’t single it out within anything specific, I suppose.

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 1d

Unfortunately it’s not “just biology”. Conflict and distinction is the very fiber of being, of perception, of reality. I will say, the sooner we stop trying to make it something else, the sooner we can be more collaborative.

Institute of Art and Ideas @iai.tv · 1d

Can biology offer a reason for our modern polarisation between nations, religions, races, ethnicities, and political camps? | https://bit.ly/48wMj5G

Join Robert Lawrence Kuhn (Closer to Truth), Massimo Pigliucci, John Dupré, and Maria Balaet to explore the biology of conflict.

#philsci 🧪

The biology of conflict

Conflicts between nations, religions, races, ethnicities, and political camps abound. Social media amplifies and inflames emotions. Can human biology offer a reason for, and a way out of, our modern p...

bit.ly

1 1

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 2d

If one assumes a duality, than the dichotomy from flux (thermo or otherwise) to eternal stable “empty space”, works out just fine.

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 2d

Reverberating Einstein’s “spooky action at a distance”.

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 2d

Even “linear” measure is impossible to break down, lest you divide it unequally. There are several philosophical, physical and mathematical expressions of this largely seen phenomena. Which indicates the requirement of asymmetry and symmetry be codependent properties. Thus, dual.

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 2d

If one takes words to have independence, this is extremely problematic for interpretation. Many multilingual people, it’s a given to allow the entire scope of the narrative to define meaning. But, some definitely struggle.

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 2d

Tool of the trade.

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 3d

True, since we can’t get away from descriptions anymore than what they describe. We can call a 4th, time, as long as we all can relate to the description.

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 3d

They wouldn’t be authoritarian if they could laugh at themselves. If they could recognize their behavior in any way, I assume.

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 3d

It's not human centric intuition, as there is no independent center of which can be lapsed by other stuff, thoughts, energies, objects, etc. All comings and goings, doings and doers are "it". There isn't another. #philsci

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 3d

In a typical retort to a _true origin of_ the answer is duality, a practiced mediation (or just "feeling in the zone") makes this clear. The examiner falls to the examined, the doer falls to the doing. It's not a moment of synchronization, it's an eternity of being, without breaks.

1 1

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 3d

When you question the doer of action, it becomes clear. I’ve read several interpretations of Wu Wei as well, it’s largely assumed the doer could balance such things.

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 3d

There’s bits about leadership, of course. It also depends on what English interpretation you’ve read some of. It largely questions the doer though, regardless of “standing”.

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 3d

Hasok Chang used active and propositional knowledge to describe the “two types of knowledge”. Or more traditionally “book smarts” and “street smarts”. I guess congratulations on describing the duality of knowing using different words?

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 4d

Computers, or ai lacks a link to communication that “isn’t human”. Such as basic cues, like sight, sound, smell and taste, but also deeper cues, like intuition and ego. For those require a humans subtle subjectivity that are constantly evolving across eternity.

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 4d

The term was birthed out as a counter to deity beliefs of pure independence, in that there is no non entity that somehow exists outside of our inferred duality, creating or has created it.

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 4d

I won’t be getting deep into the weeds of human centric knowledge. But I will say, it’s profoundly problematic yet at a negligible difference than that of an animal or plant.

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 4d

Peter Adamson @histphilosophy.bsky.social · 4d

3 7

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 5d

Universal one-ness isn’t a capture of multiplicity, it’s a recognition of the inseparable dependencies that everything is. Most godly religions assume there is an outside that is or has created all the insides and outsides we experience. A supreme creator untouched by “his” creation.

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 5d

While I understand this PoV, do you honestly find the humans building computers is not natural? That humans building computers only happens “outside” natural processes?

1 1

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 5d

Sure, math is forefront, almost entirely from our infered dual reality and the convenience of ten digits. Which, maybe unfortunately for some, includes fallacies, like true negative values. Or how I don’t find value in being intentionally deceitful. Of course, I could also just be stupid. 🤷

1 1

adichotomyofone @jasonlee.adichotomy.com · 5d

Ahh yes, the proof is truth scenario, where fallacy lives somewhere else. Maybe some other dimension, perhaps? I always wonder where we left all that fallacy. 🥹

1 1