Brian Hubbell
@hubbell.bsky.social
270 followers 540 following 74 posts
Ex-legislature, current Maine state policy advisor: appropriations, energy, climate, science, R&D, and the built environment. Born at 314 ppm.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
About 200 filling both sides of the Narraguagus bridge in tiny Cherryfield, Maine #NoKings #MEpolitics
"...what more is possible? After us the Savage God.”

www.theparisreview.org/blog/2015/09...
MIT retains integrity.

Regarding the Compact | MIT Office of the President | MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology share.google/rfDct2VtkYyI...
Regarding the Compact | MIT Office of the President | MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology
share.google
It's not complicated. There's a straight line between these two events with a common purpose of converting increased American consumers' energy costs into profits for politically-connected fossil fuel companies.
A drive across the cable-stayed bridge across the mouth of the Penobscot River. View is slightly upward roughly in plane with the car windshield. Here's a daylight still.
Penobscot Narrows, Maine
Switching off the headlights now because the highway curves are biased.
Totally attest to this. As a habitual introvert, I dreaded doing my first campaign doors. But it turns out to work just as you describe. It's about them, not your persona. And that's surprisingly empowering, as remembering those dogs and kids gives you confidence and courage in office.
I think I've seen this referred to in conjugation as a verb's "inflectional suffix"
This administration has had some real success responding to Maine's urgent need for much more affordable housing - and there's important continuing work to be done in this area. Glad to see Hannah highlighting this in her gubernatorial campaign. #MEpolitics
Maysles Brothers' Little Women
Nora Ephron's Un Chien Andalou
Disney/Pixar's The Exorcist
Offshore wind projects, now blocked by the current federal government, could have reduced New England's wholesale electric costs by 11%, saving consumers $400M per year.

Who benefits from the status quo?

renew-ne.org/wp-content/u...
renew-ne.org
It's not complicated. There's a straight line between these two events with a common purpose of converting increased American consumers' energy costs into profits for politically-connected fossil fuel companies.
Nice to see this. I played a very minor supporting part in Maine's unsuccessful application. Besides being an incredibly cool project, it still seems it would have been a good economic complement to blueberry operations.
Cannonball Quadratically
Quicksilver Voicemail
"...If we were to rewind to a particular point in time, would it be the reproducibility, or the irreproducibility that was more important?"

That's a surprisingly profound question.
I've been in the clean energy field since the 1973 oil embargo and committed to fighting climate change since Hanson testified in 1988. All I can offer today is that I'll keep at it until I die. We don't get to pick our times but we each will be judged for how we respond to them.
Reposted by Brian Hubbell
This action will directly raise the cost of electricity, & increase pollution. As I said on Open Circuit, US public lands belong to all of us. They’re ours. This Administration is not even just picking winners for what goes on public lands—they’re picking losers www.latitudemedia.com/news/open-ci...
HUGE: The Trump administration will no longer permit any solar or wind projects on federal lands unless they produce more energy-per-acre than coal, gas or nuclear power plants.

Solar and wind literally produce less energy per acre, so simply this may just kill off any project on federal lands.
Interior Order Chokes Off Permits for Solar and Wind on Federal Lands
The department creates a seemingly impossible new permitting criteria for renewable energy.
heatmap.news