Felicia Davin
@feliciadavin.com
3.1K followers 610 following 6.1K posts
I write romance & scifi/fantasy about bisexuals of various genders + a newsletter about words & books called Word Suitcase. PhD in French literature, non-practicing intellectual. Bi, she/they, www.feliciadavin.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
feliciadavin.com
Here's an updated guide to my books, including the one that comes out in November 2024. Fantasy and sci-fi romance with bisexual main characters 💖 www.feliciadavin.com/ for more info

📚🌈💙📚
White text on a blue-purple gradient background: a guide to Felicia Davin’s books. There are three book covers: a red one labelled Thornfruit, a blue one labelled Nightvine, and a purple one labelled Shadebloom, each with illustrated floral imagery on them, all by Felicia Davin.

The Gardener’s Hand (2018). Queer fantasy. Quasi-feral mindreader discovers her mom is evil, enlists the help of a sensible farmgirl and a slutty linguist. They fall in love.

Smart Bitches, Trashy Books said the characters were “phenomenal.” White text on a blue-purple gradient background: a guide to Felicia Davin’s books. There are three book covers.

The first book cover shows a figure in silhouette with his back to the viewer. His silhouette is transparent and the bluish starry void of space is visible through it. The text on the cover says "Edge of Nowhere," and below that, "Felicia Davin." The other two covers are similar but the background colors are orange (for Out of Nowhere) and green (for Nowhere Else).

The Nowhere (2018-21). A trio of m/m romances set in a world where some people can teleport. Space, evil trillionaires, sex pollen, falling in love, etc.

Edge of Nowhere was a 2018 finalist at the Bisexual Book Awards. A judge called it “a gripping, highly readable mystery” with “a compelling romantic plot.” White text on a blue-purple gradient background: a guide to Felicia Davin’s books. There are three book covers in a line, each with an illustration of two women (one tall and white and butch, the other short and brown and femme) posed together. An arrow with “all 3 of these in one book” pointing to a fourth book cover that shows the two women embracing. There is an autumnal landscape behind them.

Errant (2022). Five sapphic fantasy novellas co-authored with KR Collins and Valentine Wheeler as LK Fleet. A stoic swordswoman and a cheerful pickpocket actress wander the world causing trouble. White text on a blue-purple gradient background: a guide to Felicia Davin’s books. There are three book covers.

The first book cover is THE SCANDALOUS LETTERS OF V AND J, with an oil painting of a white hand holding a quill and writing a letter, and the title text on ripped pieces of paper scattered over the painting.

The second book cover is THE MISCHIEVOUS LETTERS OF THE MARQUISE DE Q, with an oil painting of a white hand holding a book and the title text on ripped pieces of paper scattered over the painting. 

The third book cover is THE ANONYMOUS LETTERS OF C FORESTIER, with an oil painting of a white hand holding a quill and writing a letter, and the title text on ripped pieces of paper scattered over the painting.

French Letters (2023-). Set in a magic version of 1820s Paris, told in letters, unclassifiably queer. People write a lot of horny diary entries and do some revenge murders.

The New York Times called V and J “exquisite” and said it had “the thirstiest sex imaginable
Reposted by Felicia Davin
courtneymilan.com
Anyway! I will die on the hill that romanizing a name is inherently changing it.
Reposted by Felicia Davin
mimicofmodes.com
I think a lot of people don't quite grasp how little documentation of a legal identity anyone had before, like, the 1930s. No social security number, no green card, no driver's license. This made you reliant on your social network; OTOH nobody could force you to write your name a certain way.
Reposted by Felicia Davin
alixeharrow.bsky.social
anyway it's always nice to remember there's only one law in writing, which is to get away with it. anything is legal if you look good doing it!!
feliciadavin.com
such a disappointment to experience that even far away from the fishbowl of social media!
feliciadavin.com
idk, I think my real complaint here is that I *want* real, serious discussions of craft, especially as it pertains to sex writing, and microblogging/the internet more generally is just not conducive to that. for social reasons and also... interest, I think? this is nerd shit that I want, I'm aware
feliciadavin.com
also: sometimes sex is gross! imo a lot of the best sex writing includes the weird, the messy, the animal, the unseemly. desire is mixed up with all of that. so sometimes a strange, offputting word is the right word

this isn't prescriptive. you can write a great sex scene without any of the above
feliciadavin.com
am I saying you're obligated to like everything? fuck no. be a hater all you want! but have some pride in your haterly ways. what else is wrong with that scene, other than just a single word? were you not feeling the chemistry? is the scene fundamentally boring? these are real problems!
feliciadavin.com
what I want for us, as writers, is to write sex in wild, weird, individual, horny ways that transcend "ew, that single word is yucky to me" reactions from readers

and what I want for us, as readers, is to read generously. stop entering the bedroom in search of the pea under the mattresses
feliciadavin.com
I love that I was like "any opinion of mine must necessarily be Hinged," which is honestly arrogant of me, and you're the total opposite of "if *I* think it, it's unhinged," lol
feliciadavin.com
I haven't read Hardy (am woefully underinformed about English-language literature in general) so I can't form an opinion in response, but I respect your commitment!
feliciadavin.com
if you can feel that single pea under your stack of mattresses, then the sex isn't good anyway
feliciadavin.com
Romancelandia loves to make lists of which words ruin sex scenes and I see why people get into it as a Fun Microblogging Time, but I don't think it produces better readers or better writers, I think it makes us all worse
feliciadavin.com
but I think my most "oh Romancelandia won't like this one" opinion is

sex scenes are more than the sum of their parts (lol)

if a single word—moist, cunt, whatever one you hate—ruins it for you, then it wasn't a good sex scene in the first place
feliciadavin.com
like, I can enumerate my responses to our endlessly argued bookish discourses (Sex Scenes Are Good Actually; Writers Should Read; I Like Both LitFic And Genre) or respond to wrongness I've seen in the notes (THE WHALE FACTS PARTS OF MOBY-DICK ARE FUCKING GREAT AND SO ARE THE DIGRESSIONS IN LES MIS)
feliciadavin.com
yours was one of the more fun ones I've seen on my timeline!
feliciadavin.com
oops kitchen timer going off. maybe I'll come back to this
feliciadavin.com
I think it's hard for me to consider one of my own sincerely held beliefs "unhinged"?
feliciadavin.com
all day I've been lookin at that "tell me your most unhinged literary opinion" post
feliciadavin.com
hmm yeah this is a good point—I can handle a documentary! though I would probably prefer a book
feliciadavin.com
tax deductible!

or. uh. that trip would be tax deductible in a future where we still have something resembling the current tax code and agency that collects taxes? which... who knows 😬 shit, this got bleak. sorry

anyway I haven't been to Carnac but Bretagne is beautiful
feliciadavin.com
fascinating! I didn't know "goémon" and wouldn't have known what that notation meant even if I had, lol

(honestly even if I'd read "kelp pit/oven/kiln" in English, until 10 minutes ago, I would've said "what?")
feliciadavin.com
this is all very interesting and I appreciate it, but I am dying to know why @pretensesoup.bsky.social is reading about kelp pits in French
feliciadavin.com
my brain is from the twentieth century. it can only handle certain formats