Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 7h

Ok—my legal analysis is that if there was an inexorable clash between Leahy et al. and a recent appropriation that couldn’t be fixed by the waivers or discretionary enforcement already on the books, Leahy et al. should be struck down insofar as they conflict with the more recent statute. There isn’t

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 8h

FTR, I am not saying that the bill repealed Leahy impliedly. I’m just providing game theory of how a court might address the issue

1 2

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 8h

I think it would probably be adjudicated on a case-by-case basis. If a recent bill appeared to inexorably make the CRA impossible to follow, it might be impliedly repealed. I think that is extremely unlikely to happen

1 1

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 8h

lol same typo

2

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 8h

Yeah I think that they should have issues waivers where legally required (assuming they were going to do what they wanted to do anyway)

1 2

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 8h

I’ll DM

1

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 8h

Issues or issued?

1 1

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 8h

Yeah I don’t think he was concerned with the constitutional issues. I do think that a particular contemporary appropriation passed without the laws we were talking about as a rider would suggest they don’t apply to that bill if there seems to be an intractable clash. But I recognize that’s pedantic

1 1

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 8h

Yeah I agree

1 2

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 8h

Oh 100%. But at the end of the day within the executive branch only one guy’s view matters (to simplify things dramatically)

1 1

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 8h

Yeah, but the president as commander in chief determines national security policy. It might be foolish national security policy, but it easily fits into the waiver

1 1

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 8h

I think that Biden was probably constitutionally bound to spend some amount of money on whatever congress particularized. I also think if he was interested in pressuring Israel he probably could have used the laws we’re talking about to slow down spending that money and use that money as leverage

1 1

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 8h

Yeah but there’s a completely at the discretion of the president waiver

2 1

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 8h

In this case following the letter of the law and Biden’s own goals were the same—give large amounts of money and guns to Israel

1 1

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 8h

Yes I think it’s likely that if they wanted to follow the spirit of the law they would have had an exceedingly difficult time finding proper units to do so

1 2

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 8h

I also don’t remember whether the funds were appropriated through state or DoD. DoD has a waiver function if you want to follow the letter of the law while funding human rights abuses

2 2

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 8h

Leahy law doesn’t apply to militaries writ large, it applies to particular units. Just on this point; I’m still catching up with the discussion

2 2

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 8h

I believe that the interplay between these two statutes would (for a president intent on following the constitution) be that military aid be given to Israel (more recent statute supersedes older one if clash) but that if avoidance is possible it should be taken—I.e., not to particular units

1 1

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 1d

I assume that classes where kids aren’t afraid of ostracization are far more correlated to the kindness and openness of professors than those professors’ political views

3 13

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 1d

I think a large amount of this is fear of failure in expressing oneself as a young person. Many people look for excuses as to why they won’t speak up, and a popular one today is fear “cancellation” as a proxy for fear of embarrassment in public speaking. I was lucky to have taken speech in HS

1 2 10

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 1d

Yes, of course. If I remember correctly they chose to express their position by reviewing assigned conservative readings (like I, pencil) favorably in their reaction papers—a perfectly appropriate way to express one’s views in a course premised on digesting and responding to a variety of texts

1 1 7

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 1d

From experience in your class, I sat next to a few conservative friends of mine—and they never felt that they had to align with your views! I’m sure they did well, though I don’t remember any of our grades.

1 6

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 9d

Also a virulent antisemite

1 3

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 24d

If you don’t like it here (country buttressed by and sustained by immigrants who should be treated fairly and well) maybe you should leave!

2

Elijah @elijahemery.bsky.social · 25d

"Real communism only existed on the og Kibbutzim"

1