DRaB Commish (they/them)
banner
drabcommish.bsky.social
DRaB Commish (they/them)
@drabcommish.bsky.social
180 followers 130 following 600 posts
Naughty gremlin. Don't touch me. 🔞
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Well, what is she supposed to do? Cancel the tattoo appointment?
"My experience was a little different from yours..."
The threshold for vandalism lies somewhere between. Like, spray paint can be cleaned off of a window, but it would take a lot of effort, not something you can just scrub off with a paper towel, so that would be vandalism, even though it's not permanent.

A Scotch-taped paper note? Not even close.
Meanwhile, here I am waiting for a Tiny Titty TED Talk.
Petition to give Roland McDoland some big Double Arches!
The tentacles came so hard, it's leaking out her nose and eye. 😳
Thank YOU for making posts that I'm glad to follow!
Hey, man. We Pokémon fans have it rough, okay?
Whether or not something is pornographic is all about framing. Is the media framed in an erotic way? The Decameron is full of bawdy tales, but it's clear they are not meant to titillate. The works of Pietro Aretino are intended to arouse. Both are pure art, but only Aretino's works are porn.
This post has 420 ♥s. You should celebrate.
Hey, this isn't the Dwarf! Where am I, Hol?

Holly? Kryten?

...Cat?

Where've ya gone, ya smeggers?
He's not on Bsky but I had good experiences commissioning DeepSpace wrt bust size, pose, basically everything. He does a sketch, waits for approval or change request, then lineart, waits for approval or change (with limits), then color. He's fast too, but his style is very different from yours.
I'm not into watersports, but I am into CNC, and many artists build a fanbase out of each. I know it draws negative reactions because some people would rather force others to stop than just not follow you, but if you draw it, you will eventually cultivate an audience that likes it.
By extension, I never see anyone calling the generative AI music outputs "art". I only see them being called "music".

I think it's less about implying that generative AI images bear the same creative weight as human-made illustrations, and more about people failing to be precise when speaking.
I think it speaks to a deeper vocabulary issue prior to gen AI. The word "art" is often conflated with "static visual media", ie paintings, woodcuts, illustrations, and sculpture, despite music also being art, it's rarely called that without qualifiers.

Painter = artist
Singer = "musical" artist