Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

Reposted by Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they)

Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 8h

It's a little understated that Bari Weiss is really a flat-out 'just-asking-questions' style climate change denier.

Eg, here she is saying the science is up for public debate rather than settled, publishing the work of a big-name denier influencer (Koonin), and boosting a fake controversy

Bari Weiss
@bariweiss
"Is Donald Trump a “dictator”? Did the events of January 6, 2021, in Washington, D.C., constitute an “insurgency”?

Is Joe Biden “sharp as a tack”?

Is the science of climate change “settled”?

Are Javier Milei of Argentina, Marine Le Pen of France, and the AfD party in Germany “far right”?

Is the Wuhan lab leak hypothesis a “conspiracy theory”? Was the persistence of the virus a “pandemic of the unvaccinated”? Does Anthony Fauci “represent science”?

Does Elon Musk’s social media platform, X, “promote hatred”? Do “fact-checkers” check facts?

Let’s ask a question about these questions: Why on Earth were we placed in a position of having to answer them?

In an open society, perspectives on reality confront one another in forceful competition. Each may contain some particle of truth—or at least some useful information.

So even the flat-earthers are allowed their say. Even the Bigfoot-seekers appear on the Discovery Channel. Somewhere among the nonsense, there may be something worth hearing.

Because we don’t precisely know where or when, the conversation is never over.

A vast diversity of perspectives should be promoted within an open society. It’s the intellectual equivalent of hybrid vigor.

If we all think alike, a single fatal error, being shared by all, could destroy the world.

These precepts are not original. They have long been part of the American DNA. The default, for us, has always been debate.

When certain subjects, like slavery, were made taboo and removed from the possibility of discussion, towering figures arose and terrible conflicts were fought to restore the balance.

However, the past four years have seen a sustained effort to overturn the principles of the open society. The just-departed administration, of which Biden was the decrepit figurehead, tried to impose, by threat or mandate, a version of reality that brooked no discussion.

Supported by its allies in the media, the academy, and the bureaucracy, the administrati…

Bari Weiss
@bariweiss
Climate change did not cause the LA fires says Steve Koonin in an essential conversation with our
@EmilyYoffe
:

https://thefp.com/p/climate-change-did-not-cause-the-la-fires-steve-koonin

Bari Weiss
@bariweiss
·
Sep 6, 2023
Gratified at the outpouring of responses to this important and courageous piece by
@PatrickTBrown31
.

https://thefp.com/p/i-overhyped-climate-change-to-get-published
From thefp.com
Bari Weiss
@bariweiss
·
Sep 5, 2023
"Savvy researchers tailor their studies to maximize the likelihood that their work is accepted. I know this because I am one of them.

Here’s how it works."

@PatrickTBrown31
with a must-read piece:

https://thefp.com/p/i-overhyped-climate-change-to-get-published

7 51 150

Reposted by Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they)

David Wallace-Wells @dwallacewells.bsky.social · 12h

“The earth has reached its first catastrophic tipping point linked to greenhouse gas emissions, with warm water coral reefs now facing a long-term decline and risking the livelihoods of hundreds of millions of people, according to a new report.” www.theguardian.com/environment/...

Planet’s first catastrophic climate tipping point reached, report says, with coral reefs facing ‘widespread dieback’

Unless global heating is reduced to 1.2C ‘as fast as possible’, warm water coral reefs will not remain ‘at any meaningful scale’, a report by 160 scientists from 23 countries warns

www.theguardian.com

4 74 110

Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 6h

Those folks are just the flatterers of the status quo. Easiest climate job in the world!

1 2

Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 15h

I would bet $500 that one reason for the narrative that the climate movement is dead is that so many climate people have left X. Journalists work very hard but they are also lazy and STILL look to X to figure out what to pay attention to.

2/2

6

Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 15h

I would support a campaign to get them off X, but no such campaign exists. So they are staying and not hearing 1) many important voices and 2) a chorus singing harmonies about climate change.

1.75/2

1 5

Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 15h

The critical presence is policymakers, lobbyists, and journalists. THEY are the people who have power to drive policy and whose exodus will kill X, but they are not leaving.

1.5/2

1

Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 15h

It's not zero return. I know that what I'm saying over there about Abundance is being heard by at least some policymakers because they've told me. Using tweets that have gotten "no engagement."

Furthermore, WE are not the critical presence. We have next to zero power. 1/2

2

Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 18h

Okay. Still hoping you can reply to this! Maybe it got buried?

bsky.app/profile/doct...

Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 1d

Actually, one thing I wanted to ask you is: are there any studies into carcinogenic effects that *don't* give test animals large does of the substance they're testing? I thought that was how all those studies worked — but I honestly don't know!

1

Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 18h

fair

Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 18h

fair

1

Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 18h

Disagree. The good people leaving did not make the national and international policymakers or the journalists leave. Our leaving influences nobody. And information about Gaza is better on X.

1 2

Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 1d

Tesla in Denmark 🤣

A photo of a Danish Tesla parker on the street in Copenhagen.

A photo of the same Tesla, close up, w the Danish license plate and a sticker that says, in English, "I bought this before we knew Elton was crazy."

2 3 26

Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 1d

Anyway, I'm going to have to read your reply tomorrow. I'm in Denmark at the moment, and it's actually past midnight here...

1

Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 1d

Actually, one thing I wanted to ask you is: are there any studies into carcinogenic effects that *don't* give test animals large does of the substance they're testing? I thought that was how all those studies worked — but I honestly don't know!

1

Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 1d

She then made a recommendation for the field in general.

But I guess you think the research is largely trustworthy and not tainted?

In any event, I don't think just dismissing issues like this helps one make one's case.

1

Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 1d

But she didn't say that you cited that study. She said that the general understanding (or the "scientific record") of the health effects of glyphosate is untrustworthy (or "has been tainted") and then she cited one particularly egregious reason for that.

Re "MAHA Is Focused on the Wrong Pesticide," by Michael
Grunwald (Opinion guest essay, Oct. 3): "There is no Roundup crisis," Mr. Grunwald writes. But there is, and the crisis is epistemological: The scientific record has been skewed to the point that a credible risk-benefit analysis of
glyphosate cannot be conducted with confidence. One telling case is a glyphosate safety review published in the
journal Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology in 2000. Litigation documents released in 2017 revealed that it was conceived and drafted by Monsanto staff members, yet it circulated as an independent review. Twenty-five years on, it still anchors the conversation: heavily cited, invoked in policy debates and embedded in Wikipedia and, by extension, A.I. models -
shaping how the public encounters "the science."

2 2

Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 1d

Oh no! Too young!

1 1 29

Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 1d

Especially because one of the writers is Naomi Oreskes, for god's sake.

1 2

Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 1d

bsky.app/profile/doct...

Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 1d

huh, I am a philistine, I guess

Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 1d

huh, I am a philistine, I guess

1 1

Reposted by Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they)

Naomi Oreskes @naomioreskes.bsky.social · 1d

If you saw the recent piece in @nytimes.com claiming that "Spraying round-up on crops is fine. Really." Please read our reply.
@davechapman.bsky.social @ninaelkadi.com @michaelpollan.bsky.social

www.nytimes.com/2025/10/11/o...

Opinion | Debating the Dangers of a Pesticide

www.nytimes.com

4 20 35

Reposted by Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they)

David Roberts @volts.wtf · 1d

Turns out protest alone was never what changed things, it was protest *plus media coverage of protests*, which prompted officials to respond to protests, which increased public awareness of protests, etc.

If the protest happens & corporate media simply ignores it ... it's inert.

ineptitudinous.bsky.social @ineptitudinous.bsky.social · 1d

Six out of eight of the largest mass-movement protests in US history have happened since 2017. You wouldn't know this from most media reporting, and you sure af wouldn't know this from the way either major party has reacted.

26 190 700

Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 1d

Milankovitch cycles—infinitesimal shifts in the planet's rotational axis that allowed marginally more sunlight to hit the planet over millennia—repeatedly brought the Earth out of its ice ages.

It was mad to think that 1.3C of heating in, like, a century wouldn't totally destabilize our climate.

David Wallace-Wells @dwallacewells.bsky.social · 1d

“Planet-heating methane is escaping from cracks in the Antarctic seabed as the region warms, with new seeps being discovered at an ‘astonishing rate,’ scientists have found.” www.cnn.com/2025/10/10/c...

Scientists discovered something alarming seeping out from beneath the ocean around Antarctica | CNN

Planet-heating methane is escaping from cracks in the Antarctic seabed, with new seeps being discovered at an “astonishing rate,” raising fears that future global warming predictions may have been und...

www.cnn.com

1 32 59

Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 1d

This is unworthy of you. Can you please actually explain why the objections readers raised are wrong?

3 2

Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 1d

and mostly by women...

4