http://www.pulpanddagger.com/dk_latta.html
https://www.amazon.ca/s?k=dk+latta&crid=3MO9V7TS40KDB&spr
strangehorizons.com/wordpress/fi...
"What I particularly love about it is how Latta fits such carefully drawn characters and so much subtle emotion into a very action-packed short story." ~M. Haskins
Willow.
Willow.
Alas
Alas
Arguably the Craig films are also influenced by Mission: Impossible films (which, of course, are influenced by...Bond). The Craig films tilt toward a "team" with Q, Moneypenny, M having bigger roles 4/3
3/3
Arguably the Craig films are also influenced by Mission: Impossible films (which, of course, are influenced by...Bond). The Craig films tilt toward a "team" with Q, Moneypenny, M having bigger roles 4/3
Which is sad and problematic
Which is sad and problematic
I've never been sure if, in popular music, "bridge", "turnaround", (and even "Middle 8"), are interchangeable terms/ideas (either literally or at least colloquially) or whether they have subtly distinct meanings and you'd look foolish confusing them in a conversation. 🤷
I've never been sure if, in popular music, "bridge", "turnaround", (and even "Middle 8"), are interchangeable terms/ideas (either literally or at least colloquially) or whether they have subtly distinct meanings and you'd look foolish confusing them in a conversation. 🤷
It proved interesting by making me think about swearing, its use, & relevance to writing.
1/2
It proved interesting by making me think about swearing, its use, & relevance to writing.
1/2
That line still haunts in its insight-into-the-human-animal way
That line still haunts in its insight-into-the-human-animal way
Book(s) that are both SFF short stories & a history/narrative:
www.amazon.ca/Masques-Chro...
Book(s) that are both SFF short stories & a history/narrative:
www.amazon.ca/Masques-Chro...
Few "bad" (while arguably few "great" lol)
Very formulaic; its strength (it's a solid structure) & weakness (repetitive yet when it tries to diverge from formula films can be uneven)
Yet it maps/reflects the cultural zeitgeist of the eras 1/2
Few "bad" (while arguably few "great" lol)
Very formulaic; its strength (it's a solid structure) & weakness (repetitive yet when it tries to diverge from formula films can be uneven)
Yet it maps/reflects the cultural zeitgeist of the eras 1/2
(NTTD was OK, not tryin' to diss it per se)
(NTTD was OK, not tryin' to diss it per se)
Editing
Stephen King once wrote a 2nd draft should be 10% shorter than the first.
But we all hate to cut. And dilemma is: if the reader is bored because it's too long...doesn't that mean they're bored period? (Esp with a poem; what is rind and what the fruit?"
Editing
Stephen King once wrote a 2nd draft should be 10% shorter than the first.
But we all hate to cut. And dilemma is: if the reader is bored because it's too long...doesn't that mean they're bored period? (Esp with a poem; what is rind and what the fruit?"
Here's the thing: a lot of #SFF mags *say* they accept all genres "including superheroes"...but I rarely see 'em publish that genre.
So: bad story or just an editorial brick wall? Dunno.
Here's the thing: a lot of #SFF mags *say* they accept all genres "including superheroes"...but I rarely see 'em publish that genre.
So: bad story or just an editorial brick wall? Dunno.
Finally found a mag that accepted it.
Came across TWO subsequent reviews that cited that story as a fav (of that issue; another of stories they read recently)
1) it's not good but fixable/worth working on
2) not good. forget it.
3) perfectly publishable just not that fresh/exceptional
4) good/great but too outre/not what the eds looking for
Keep subbing it or bench it? how to know?
Finally found a mag that accepted it.
Came across TWO subsequent reviews that cited that story as a fav (of that issue; another of stories they read recently)
1) it's not good but fixable/worth working on
2) not good. forget it.
3) perfectly publishable just not that fresh/exceptional
4) good/great but too outre/not what the eds looking for
Keep subbing it or bench it? how to know?
1) it's not good but fixable/worth working on
2) not good. forget it.
3) perfectly publishable just not that fresh/exceptional
4) good/great but too outre/not what the eds looking for
Keep subbing it or bench it? how to know?
Cara Gee, Shawn Doyle, Kristin Kreuk, Terry Chen (why those 4? Who knows) Investigating some sort of empty haunted house. History and tension between them. While waiting in an empty room (for ghosts and/or hiding from ghosts) they decide to play Can-Do. 1/4
Point is: 90% time I cast Canadian actors.
Sooo many CDN actors have no idea of movies they've starred in...in my brain
lol
Cara Gee, Shawn Doyle, Kristin Kreuk, Terry Chen (why those 4? Who knows) Investigating some sort of empty haunted house. History and tension between them. While waiting in an empty room (for ghosts and/or hiding from ghosts) they decide to play Can-Do. 1/4
Point is: 90% time I cast Canadian actors.
Sooo many CDN actors have no idea of movies they've starred in...in my brain
lol
Point is: 90% time I cast Canadian actors.
Sooo many CDN actors have no idea of movies they've starred in...in my brain
lol
1/2
Thinking about my suspicion the scene in Rise of Skywalker with the horses on the star destroyer was originally written for Rose & the beasts from TLJ
1/2
More seriously: one ed saying a rewrite "blew him away" and another saying my style had a "dry wryness" which I should tattoo on my body ('cause I think it sums up a lot of my style, or attempts at anyway)
More seriously: one ed saying a rewrite "blew him away" and another saying my style had a "dry wryness" which I should tattoo on my body ('cause I think it sums up a lot of my style, or attempts at anyway)
Le plus ca change....eh?
1/2
Le plus ca change....eh?
1/2