DevilBoy216
@devilboy216.bsky.social
130 followers 450 following 710 posts
I'm here to give Nickelodeon their balls back. ♾️⚛️♠️ https://fanfiction.net/u/10513191/DevilBoy216 https://archiveofourown.org/users/DevilBoy216 https://www.change.org/p/my-pitch-for-a-nicktoons-revival-standwithanimation
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
devilboy216.bsky.social
Nickelodeon owner Paramount has bribed Donald Trump, Epstein's best friend, for 16 million dollars to approve their merger with Skydance.

I'm offering a public option against them, with a way of sending a message against this corrupt deal.

chng.it/8DKkHqXdY5
Sign the Petition
My pitch for a Nicktoons revival/public option against Nickelodeon. #CancelParamount
chng.it
devilboy216.bsky.social
...in the days of tech-broligarchs and AI.

And of course, Legacy is just BEAUTIFUL to look at. Tron was impressive for its time, but Legacy showed the full potential done right to me.

Also, Daft Punk. 'Nuff said.

From what the trailers showed, and what you say, I think Ares gets the look right.
devilboy216.bsky.social
...I thought was an interesting concept, and the first movie was supposed to feel like a Biblical epic like Ben-Hur.

Legacy took those themes and drove them further, which I thought was fascinating, especially how Kevin Flynn tried to create a perfect system using the Grid; a poignant concept...
devilboy216.bsky.social
Sounds like I'll have fun either way, then.

How come you didn't like Legacy? A friend from work turned me to it (and the original, in turn), and he loved it, and I was amazed myself at it.

The original showed a kind of religious undertone to it, in that Users are considered like deities, which...
devilboy216.bsky.social
Ares was a big improvement over Legacy? I don't know, man, that's a pretty high bar to set, but I'll see it soon and judge for myself.

Does it pick up where the lore left off from the first two?
devilboy216.bsky.social
He also literally said, with a straight face, "Circumcision is not a violation of human rights".
devilboy216.bsky.social
LOL. This pro-genital mutilation creep blocked me because he couldn't win the argument.

As I said in the original post: MGM should be banned, but not for RFK's BS rationale.

#Intactivism
devilboy216.bsky.social
LOL. This pro-genital mutilation creep blocked me because he couldn't win the argument.
devilboy216.bsky.social
Once again, then, you are wrong. Eventually, everyone will look past MGM as the barbaric practice it was, and be viewed with scorn.
devilboy216.bsky.social
MGM was only exclusive to Judaism in Europe, before and after WWII. Any bans on MGM are almost always stopped, such as in Germany and Denmark, because of the BS excuse of antisemitism.

I WISH they went through with the bans.
devilboy216.bsky.social
Korea is the exception due to U.S. influence since the Korean war. It basically didn't exist there until then.
devilboy216.bsky.social
Your aforementioned infections. I'm assuming they were Urinary Tract Infections.

Please correct me if I'm wrong.
devilboy216.bsky.social
That's some grade-A bullshit. Human rights are human rights. It doesn't matter how young you are, they apply to EVERYONE.

Unless everyone has human rights, no one does.
devilboy216.bsky.social
MGM is about as medical as lobotomies were. Eventually, people realized how much harm it did, and whatever "benefits" did espouse, the cure turned out to be worse than the disease. MGM is not medicine. It is fraud.

Also, it only became "medical" to "cure" maturbation.
devilboy216.bsky.social
So is RFK himself and several Americans, but they are.

And Asia is almost not Catholic at all, and most of Europe is irreligious. They also happen to have universal healthcare that doesn't profit off more surgeries and procedures to squeeze more money out of people.
devilboy216.bsky.social
Well, then, your opinion is wrong, as the actual facts prove.

And I find your "individual family" stance about as valid as "state's rights". Children are human beings who deserve bodily autonomy. Not like property you can modify however you please.
devilboy216.bsky.social
99% of European, South American, Asian, and Central American men would disagree with both of those statements.
devilboy216.bsky.social
...is it even considered up for debate that amputating skin from genitals is an option to fix it.

And according to your own testimony, it was fixed, so you just disproved your own argument for it, in that you showed other options can fix it.
devilboy216.bsky.social
Then obviously you weren't looking, because there have been several reports of children losing their entire penises or dying because of MGM, which would not have happened if their parents just did nothing.

I'm assuming you're referring to UTIs. That can happen between both sexes, but only in one...
devilboy216.bsky.social
It's not "extra" when it serves a purpose, and literally everyone is born with it. And it's still removal without their consent, and PART OF their genitals.

At least 6 people hearted my comment (including you) and no one hearted your counterarguements.
devilboy216.bsky.social
Because you're amputating part of their genitals without their consent, stealing and destroying thousands of nerve endings and important functions.

Next question.
devilboy216.bsky.social
Hey, genius: I am Autistic, and not once did I confirm or spread RFK's BS claims. I just said it should be banned anyway, regardless of what RFK said.

If anything, his misinformation undermines actual intactivism.
devilboy216.bsky.social
They are decisions that impact childrens' lives in a negative way. A parent has no right to consent to the removal of their child's genitals than they do any other body part.

You should note that your own followers are not agreeing with you on this topic. Stop digging a hole for yourself.
devilboy216.bsky.social
I do, because they were. But it's not their fault; I blame their ignorant parents.

The examples you listed are basic societal expectations. MGM does not exist in most of the civilized world.

And don't take my word for it. There are plenty of men who were cut as adults and regretted it after.
devilboy216.bsky.social
I didn't say raping an adult is "better". That's still an egregious crime.

I said raping a child is even worse, because it's a child.