@dclawyer317.bsky.social
Is this amicus brief in Trump v Illinois really arguing 12406(3) repealed the Posse Comitatus Act? That seems unlikely, to say the least.
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25...
@martylederman.bsky.social
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25...
@martylederman.bsky.social
November 10, 2025 at 6:06 PM
Is this amicus brief in Trump v Illinois really arguing 12406(3) repealed the Posse Comitatus Act? That seems unlikely, to say the least.
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25...
@martylederman.bsky.social
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25...
@martylederman.bsky.social
Good advice for Congress with respect to this Administration's actions.
April 13, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Good advice for Congress with respect to this Administration's actions.
Now pitching for the Giants: reliever Spencer Bivens. I hope the Giants consider trying him as a starter this year so we can debate whether to extend Bivens to a new context.
March 29, 2025 at 9:45 PM
Now pitching for the Giants: reliever Spencer Bivens. I hope the Giants consider trying him as a starter this year so we can debate whether to extend Bivens to a new context.
ESPN giving whole new meaning to the term "double team"
March 5, 2025 at 4:26 AM
ESPN giving whole new meaning to the term "double team"
No 4A grants at SCOTUS this morning, but two Justices indicate willingness to consider "whether and to what extent the Fourth Amendment incorporates the in-the-presence rule" for misdemeanor arrests. @orinkerr.bsky.social
February 24, 2025 at 5:37 PM
No 4A grants at SCOTUS this morning, but two Justices indicate willingness to consider "whether and to what extent the Fourth Amendment incorporates the in-the-presence rule" for misdemeanor arrests. @orinkerr.bsky.social
ESPN pulling no punches on its view of the CFP's selection decisions:
December 8, 2024 at 5:47 PM
ESPN pulling no punches on its view of the CFP's selection decisions:
Optimist: The cup is half full.
Pessimist: The cup is half empty.
GC: Our preliminary view in the time provided is that the text, context, and history of the cup establish that viewing the cup as half full is a legally available option. But we cannot foreclose the possibility the cup is half empty.
Pessimist: The cup is half empty.
GC: Our preliminary view in the time provided is that the text, context, and history of the cup establish that viewing the cup as half full is a legally available option. But we cannot foreclose the possibility the cup is half empty.
Optimist: The cup is half full.
Pessimist: The cup is half empty.
Appellate specialist: Can you point to where in the record you mentioned the cup? I'm just worried about preservation.
Pessimist: The cup is half empty.
Appellate specialist: Can you point to where in the record you mentioned the cup? I'm just worried about preservation.
Optimist: The cup is half full.
Pessimist: The cup is half empty.
Originalist: At the time of the founding, the term "cup" might have referred to a bumper, a brimmer, or a tankard.
Pessimist: The cup is half empty.
Originalist: At the time of the founding, the term "cup" might have referred to a bumper, a brimmer, or a tankard.
November 25, 2024 at 1:41 AM
Optimist: The cup is half full.
Pessimist: The cup is half empty.
GC: Our preliminary view in the time provided is that the text, context, and history of the cup establish that viewing the cup as half full is a legally available option. But we cannot foreclose the possibility the cup is half empty.
Pessimist: The cup is half empty.
GC: Our preliminary view in the time provided is that the text, context, and history of the cup establish that viewing the cup as half full is a legally available option. But we cannot foreclose the possibility the cup is half empty.