Denys Beecher
@dbeecher.bsky.social
2.4K followers 630 following 14K posts
16 years in US Social Security law, primarily disability claim representation
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
dbeecher.bsky.social
Freedom of choice is bourgeois? I fear I may not have read enough theory.
dbeecher.bsky.social
See prior skeet:
dbeecher.bsky.social
What does that have to do with political strategies?
dbeecher.bsky.social
What does that have to do with political strategies?
dbeecher.bsky.social
If you're arguing for a continental plate definition you're going to encounter some immediate problems with your "Central America is part of North America" premise.
dbeecher.bsky.social
I have reconsidered my formatting for this thought:

R(!)ACK
dbeecher.bsky.social
I am also puzzled by "get back to what worked in the past." Not sure I see substantive differences between now and then.
dbeecher.bsky.social
Hasn't Jones come out with some anti-Trump stuff recently? Particularly around the Epstein files I think. Maybe he's just too out of favor at the moment.
dbeecher.bsky.social
It remains bizarre though. They can't manage to find an unenumerated right to protect our privacy or autonomy from the government, but they think they can find an unenumerated right for parents to violate the privacy an autonomy of their children.
dbeecher.bsky.social
What is the constitutional question? They don't read a penumbral right to privacy and autonomy, but they can find an anti-right somewhere?
dbeecher.bsky.social
So, a video game, premised on contemporary reality, replicated the contemporary reality that there are actually women in the military, therefore woke?
cerberusxt.bsky.social
Imagine living your life in constant fear of anything not being white men. Sounds exhausting and pathetic.
dbeecher.bsky.social
Yeah. It’s technically but in no way meaningfully correct
dbeecher.bsky.social
Definitely not going to share this with my Grinch obsessed friend. She'd be buying one immediately.
dbeecher.bsky.social
I think a couple, yes. One with at least some excuse. I was mildly a jerk to them when they keep coming back with “but the law might change”
dbeecher.bsky.social
What Laura really has here is PTSD and imposter syndrome, because she is absolutely one of the smartest people I know, even if it was "self-educated."
dbeecher.bsky.social
I have long ago given up trying to sort out the details of what I remember actually learning in school and what I remember reading about outside of school, particularly for history topics
dbeecher.bsky.social
You’d have to show that the actions were outside the scope of their federal duties, otherwise they get supremacy clause immunity.
dbeecher.bsky.social
No, there aren’t. The court tossed Bivens claims for First Amendment retaliation three years ago.
dbeecher.bsky.social
And, the feds have sovereign immunity from such a claim. Westfall would allow the gov to stand in for them and false arrest is explicitly listed as an exception to the FTCA.
dbeecher.bsky.social
Yes, law changed. Bivens actions only exist as a result of case law. The court acted and narrowed the applicability of that law. And the injunction won't help others in the future, it would apply to the person filing the suit. They'd be enjoined from taking specific action against that person.
dbeecher.bsky.social
"Unfortunately, the details are held in secret files until 2017..."

Someone needs to get to the bottom of those secret files immediately.