Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 5h

And so its starts - TODAY is a key day - after the MASSIVE irrational exuberance this morning - should it turn - this will hurt LIKE HELL

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 5h

I do, of course, when executing myself - but as a general rule - across US and especially EU (with record low volume) - 0DTEs being like +80% of volume around open - retail is showing up as never before - started during Covid when retail “beat” instis for the first ever time. Now, payback time

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 6h

Which metric ? We can see that 0DTE dominates trading and that retail “generally” goes long (and normally gets stopped out - as last three days - but before not really). Hence the constant pre market buying as MMs take the market higher and fill retail and with premium they make very little

1

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 6h

Good comment. The market has "changed" - for the first time since the latest April rally started - 0DTEs and retail have had severe losses three days in a row - destroying a lot of premium paid - hence today they are all going all-in - "should" the market have an intraday reversal "today" -it's over

2 2

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 7h

EXACTLY. Thank you - or even, "more buyers than sellers at a price lower than the current trade or indicated price"

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 7h

Today is the BIG BIG test for the markets. Max pre market Longs of 0DTE / retail - no EU buyers whatsoever - if it turns today - it should be the end of any rally

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 11h

Today will be the day - "if" there is an intraday reversal of the current irrational exuberance in the Nadaq - then we have 4 days of wipeout for retail in 0DTE - each day erases a lot of their firepower

1

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 11h

The underlying premise of your question - when it should be the other way around ? Are there any proponents who have any arguments that have been proven "yet" that would advocate for such an enormous accounting fraud and money theft ?

1 9

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 11h

So they caused no damage ? I am not getting into some kind of propaganda fight here. Just a couple of days ago there was a break in into a military base. But those don't bother you. Your criteria is not "the law", and hence irrelevant.

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 12h

Trident Ploughshares etc etc

1

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 12h

As in every bubble, it all turns “religious” at some point, even faced with an obvious Ponzi scheme to extract money from idiots

5

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 12h

It is clear that “the airplanes” triggered the government because the RAF was scanning Gaza throughout the genocide and children murder - and the backlash when it becomes evident that outright children murder support was and is given - would destroy even this worst Labour government

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 12h

The airplanes cost 350m GBP a year "at least", and supposedly two engines (but who knows with a lying government) needed changing at a cost of 2.5m GBP each - so about 1% of yearly cost (but probably much less). The individuals need to be held accountable and not used as pawns to protect genocide

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 13h

What does your second point even mean ? Even if the ECHR were to be used "for political reasons" (as it should never be used by the way) - why would those reasons by "UK" political reasons ? The UK is a rogue state that has supported genocide and children murder outright and explicitly

1

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 13h

Even if you argue "this" - then the "law" needs to be applied equally - and there are MANY organisations that "then" would have to be seen as "terrorists" - but that is not the goal, or is the goal - is it ?

1 1

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 13h

So, the individuals should be held accountable. "Using" the actions of a few individuals with terror laws that have NOTHING to do with it, in order to quell dissent against its children murder and genocide support, is an absolute disgrace

2

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 13h

So they weren't destroyed ? There was minimal damage (compared to the price of the "products") ? And such should be used in order to quell dissent against a government that EXPLICITLY supports genocide and children murder ? No. Everyone knows this was used in order to perpetuate murder

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 13h

Then those individuals who “harmed” (destroyed is ridiculous propaganda) military equipment should be held accountable. Undermining free speech in order to quell dissent for murder of children is an absolute disgrace and should be enough to send the politicians to Den Haag

1 5

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 13h

An “inopportune” time should be irrelevant. Right or wrong should “rule”. Always, and, of course, especially when the government supports children murder and genocide explicitly. Calling something “proportionate” when it stops peaceful protests against a government that supports children murder ?!!?

1 3

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 15h

An absolute disgrace. Humankind is embarrassing, repeating the same fraudulent mistakes over and over again

2

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 1d

These things are SO bearish. Sell off tomorrow and the short term retail muppets have had theee big losses in three days. That should break their back

1

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 2d

Perplexity Pro mostly

1

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 2d

No chance. Either they “succeed” and it can be done virtually without any of that, or it is a complete waste. Either way, all is wasted, and it is just a normal money grabbing fraud tricking idiots - hence the pathetic circular Ponzi scheme financing

1

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 2d

So you are saying all investment in data centres is unnecessary and the ongoing energy cost - to them and society - will disappear ?

1

davidgarciaspai.bsky.social @davidgarciaspai.bsky.social · 2d

Ok 7-8 years. And there is no chance any company will survive financially

1