Daragh Grant
banner
daraghjgrant.bsky.social
Daragh Grant
@daraghjgrant.bsky.social
4.4K followers 1.1K following 93 posts
UChicago. Early American history; colonialism and empire; legal history; history of political thought. https://www.daraghjgrant.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Constantin Fasolt’s “Hegel’s Ghost: Europe, the Reformation, and the Middle Ages” (2008) is a magisterial example of a scholar at the height of his powers who knows how to say exactly what he means and understands the immense difficulty of doing so. Ungated PDF👇 www.brepolsonline.net/doi/abs/10.1...
Hegel’s Ghost: Europe, the Reformation, and the Middle Ages | Viator
According to an old historical tradition, the Reformation marked a fundamental break from the Middle Ages. The tradition has a point, because the Reformation really did bring major change. But it is a...
www.brepolsonline.net
This is a beautiful little film. Its use of silence works brilliantly to highlight the deep well of revolutionary disappointment that McGahern depicts so carefully in his work, without ever quite succumbing to it. youtu.be/WiZn7figKHc
THAT THEY MAY FACE THE RISING SUN Official Trailer
YouTube video by Juno Films
youtu.be
You can find other testimony in support, including the position of the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation, here: www.cga.ct.gov/aspx/CGADisp...
www.cga.ct.gov
My reconstruction of the treaty is attached. 2/3
There is a senate joint resolution (SJ 16) before the Government Administration and Elections Committee of the Connecticut General Assembly pertaining to the Treaty of Hartford (1638), and its provisions enjoining the extermination of the Pequot people. Below is my testimony. 1/3
Reposted by Daragh Grant
What is one to conclude from the contrast between the AHA’s position on Ukraine and its position on Gaza other than it believes some people’s histories are worth more than others?
“I met a traveller from an antique land.” I’m not sure I would insist on better, but I liked the points of contact.
This is, it seems to me, a more fruitful way to make use of Wittgenstein in social & political theory than to see him as a mere methodological alibi for contending idealist accounts focused on pinning down what historical theorists meant by what they said. /end
Both—abstruse theorist and dogmatic activist—are, to borrow Wittgenstein's felicitous metaphors, idling, failing to meet the rough ground, gone on holiday. Like Weber and Marx before him, Hall is attuned to the emptiness of both one-sided idealism and a one-sided materialism. 4/5
What is crucial for Hall is that the error is mutual; the theorist who imagines getting a grip on the world apart from any concern with practice is mirrored by the activist who thinks that they already have all of the answers that they need in the orthodox authorities. 3/5
If for Wittgenstein philosophers went astray when they imagined that they could prise meaning apart from use, Hall makes a similar case for the error—political and intellectual—of trying to prise theory from practice. 2/5
There is, I think, a way to conceive of Stuart Hall’s diagnosis of the Left’s ills through an idiom by which Wittgenstein took issue with much of what passed for philosophy. 1/5
Reposted by Daragh Grant
January afternoon sunlight, Merrion Square, Dublin
The model student: Russell on Moore on Wittgenstein—“[Moore] says he always feels W. /must/ be right when they disagree. He says during his lectures W. always looks frightfully puzzled, but nobody else does.”
Reposted by Daragh Grant
So sad to see an established historian punch down and personally attack a contingent faculty member like Claire Potter does here. Highly unprofessional behavior. 🗃️
I’m not saying it means anything or whatever, but when the baby fusses, she’s most quickly soothed by the idea that “the city comes into being for the sake of living, but exists for the sake of living well.” She is totally uninterested in whether you like that translation though.
Have heard great things about it. Hope to make it before it closes.
It’s all just so staggeringly monstrous.
David Scott’s skeptical formulation, that “X is not so much wrong, as irrelevant,” is a doubt that we could all productively tarry with before spilling our ink.
Reposted by Daragh Grant