Snakes. Why’d it have to be snakes?
@cronencrown.bsky.social
420 followers 200 following 1.9K posts
Chemist, avid reader, into SciFi, foodie, love 80s movies and good coffee. Carl Sagan was a wise man. 🇺🇦🇪🇺
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
True, unfortunately... at least with streaming, they have a chance of a continuous (slow) burn
very cool film, liked it very much. Sadly, the cinema was mostly empty. It could have been advertised a little more, I reckon
Reposted by Snakes. Why’d it have to be snakes?
It turns out that making things more expensive makes them more expensive.
Ah, a true gem of a movie. I enjoyed this a lot more than I thought I would... and my expectations were high
TUCKER AND DALE VS. EVIL (2010) screens next week, Tuesday & Wednesday October 21st & 22nd on a 35mm double bill with SHAUN OF THE DEAD (2004). Tickets: buff.ly/bX3mksI
Kids logic: it has more blades, ergo it is more dangerous
I remember being mightily impressed, back when I saw that movie for the first time, as a kid 👋
Reposted by Snakes. Why’d it have to be snakes?
That movie really stuck with me. Very unpleasant, I remember. Creepy as hell
I had no idea that Cocktail actually came out AFTER Top Gun... Weird. Had it backwards in my mind
yep, instant crush, back in the days. What can I say? 🤷‍♂️
Reposted by Snakes. Why’d it have to be snakes?
The Silence of the Lambs (1991)

The poster was based on Salvador Dali’s ‘In Voluptas Mors’, which means ‘Voluptuous death’.

Apt as Buffalo Bill only targets and skins young women who are ‘Roomy’

#Horror #FilmSky #Movies #Cinema
Didn't know that - cool fact. Thanks! 👍😉
Reposted by Snakes. Why’d it have to be snakes?